• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

436 例耐药性癫痫患者行迷走神经刺激治疗:长期疗效及疗效预测因素。

Vagus nerve stimulation in 436 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: long-term outcomes and predictors of response.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.017
PMID:21144802
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation in a consecutive series of adults and children with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE).

METHODS

In this retrospective review of a prospectively created database of 436 consecutive patients who underwent vagus nerve stimulator implantation for TRE between November 1997 and April 2008, there were 220 (50.5%) females and 216 (49.5%) males ranging in age from 1 to 76 years at the time of implantation (mean: 29.0 ± 16.5). Thirty-three patients (7.6%) in the primary implantation group had inadequate follow-up (<3 months from implantation) and three patients had early device removal because of infection and were excluded from seizure control outcome analyses.

RESULTS

Duration of vagus nerve stimulation treatment varied from 10 days to 11 years (mean: 4.94 years). Mean seizure frequency significantly improved following implantation (mean reduction: 55.8%, P<0.0001). Seizure control ≥ 90% was achieved in 90 patients (22.5%), ≥ 75% seizure control in 162 patients (40.5%), ≥ 50% improvement in 255 patients (63.75%), and <50% improvement in 145 patients (36.25%). Permanent injury to the vagus nerve occurred in 2.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Vagus nerve stimulation is a safe and effective palliative treatment option for focal and generalized TRE in adults and children. When used in conjunction with a multidisciplinary and multimodality treatment regimen including aggressive antiepileptic drug regimens and epilepsy surgery when appropriate, more than 60% of patients with TRE experienced at least a 50% reduction in seizure burden. Good results were seen in patients with non-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indications. Prospective, randomized trials are needed for patients with generalized epilepsies and for younger children to potentially expand the number of patients who may benefit from this palliative treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估迷走神经刺激在一系列成人和儿童耐药性癫痫(TRE)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项对 1997 年 11 月至 2008 年 4 月期间因 TRE 接受迷走神经刺激器植入的 436 例连续患者的前瞻性创建数据库的回顾性研究中,有 220 例(50.5%)为女性,216 例(49.5%)为男性,植入时年龄为 1 至 76 岁(平均:29.0 ± 16.5)。在原发性植入组中,有 33 例患者(7.6%)随访不足(植入后<3 个月),有 3 例患者因感染早期移除设备,故排除在癫痫发作控制结果分析之外。

结果

迷走神经刺激治疗的时间从 10 天到 11 年不等(平均:4.94 年)。植入后癫痫发作频率显著改善(平均减少:55.8%,P<0.0001)。90 例患者(22.5%)达到≥90%的癫痫发作控制,162 例患者(40.5%)达到≥75%的癫痫发作控制,255 例患者(63.75%)癫痫发作改善≥50%,145 例患者(36.25%)癫痫发作改善<50%。迷走神经永久性损伤发生率为 2.8%。

结论

迷走神经刺激是成人和儿童局灶性和全身性 TRE 的一种安全有效的姑息治疗选择。当与多学科、多模式治疗方案联合使用时,包括积极的抗癫痫药物治疗方案和适当的癫痫手术,超过 60%的 TRE 患者的癫痫发作负担至少减少 50%。非美国食品和药物管理局批准的适应证患者也取得了良好的效果。需要进行前瞻性、随机试验,以确定全身性癫痫和年龄较小的儿童患者是否可能从这种姑息治疗中获益。

相似文献

1
Vagus nerve stimulation in 436 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: long-term outcomes and predictors of response.436 例耐药性癫痫患者行迷走神经刺激治疗:长期疗效及疗效预测因素。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
2
Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation over time: review of 65 consecutive patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS > 10 years.迷走神经刺激的长期疗效:65 例难治性癫痫患者 VNS 治疗>10 年的回顾。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Mar;20(3):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.042. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
3
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
4
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis.迷走神经刺激术治疗结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫。
Pediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;43(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.03.003.
5
The efficacy of vagal nerve stimulation in children with pharmacoresistant epilepsy: practical experience at a Turkish tertiary referral center.迷走神经刺激术治疗药物难治性癫痫儿童的疗效:土耳其三级转诊中心的实践经验。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Jul;14(4):334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.09.010. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
6
Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine induction in patients with refractory epilepsy.迷走神经刺激对难治性癫痫患者促炎和抗炎细胞因子诱导的影响。
J Neuroimmunol. 2009 Sep 29;214(1-2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
7
Vagus nerve stimulation therapy in patients with autism spectrum disorder and intractable epilepsy: results from the vagus nerve stimulation therapy patient outcome registry.自闭症谱系障碍和难治性癫痫患者的迷走神经刺激疗法:来自迷走神经刺激疗法患者结局登记处的结果
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Jun;5(6):595-602. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.PEDS09153.
8
Vagus nerve stimulation for the management of seizures in children: an 8-year experience.迷走神经刺激术治疗儿童癫痫发作:8 年经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jul;45(7):1479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.066.
9
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction.儿童难治性癫痫的迷走神经刺激:迷走神经刺激的作用不止于降低癫痫发作频率。
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):1220-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
10
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: a Belgian multicenter study.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫:一项比利时多中心研究。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2007 Sep;11(5):261-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical gaps in closed-loop neurotechnology: a scoping review.闭环神经技术中的伦理差距:一项范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 8;8(1):510. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01908-4.
2
Vagal nerve signals are modulated by spontaneous seizures in Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg.来自斯特拉斯堡的遗传性失神癫痫大鼠的迷走神经信号受自发性癫痫发作的调节。
Front Neurosci. 2025 Jul 7;19:1568261. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1568261. eCollection 2025.
3
The Effectiveness of Cenobamate in Patients Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug Resistant Epilepsy.
氯巴占在接受迷走神经刺激治疗的耐药性癫痫患者中的有效性。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70229. doi: 10.1111/ene.70229.
4
Reduction of generalized tonic-clonic seizures following vagus nerve stimulation therapy: CORE-VNS Study 24-month follow-up.迷走神经刺激疗法后全身强直阵挛性发作的减少:CORE-VNS研究24个月随访
Epilepsia. 2025 Jul;66(7):2307-2314. doi: 10.1111/epi.18371. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
5
The Role of Neuroinflammation and Network Anomalies in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.神经炎症和网络异常在耐药性癫痫中的作用
Neurosci Bull. 2025 May;41(5):881-905. doi: 10.1007/s12264-025-01348-w. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
6
Vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Twenty-four-month data and experience from the CORE-VNS study.迷走神经刺激治疗伦诺克斯-加斯东综合征:来自CORE-VNS研究的24个月数据及经验
Epilepsia. 2025 May;66(5):1540-1549. doi: 10.1111/epi.18289. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
7
Introducing the Index of Response to Stimulation (IRES): A Novel Metric for Assessing Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.介绍刺激反应指数(IRES):一种评估耐药性癫痫患者迷走神经刺激效果的新指标。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 4;61(1):75. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010075.
8
Practical Considerations for the rapid titration of VNS.迷走神经刺激快速滴定的实际考量
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024 Dec 13;29:100734. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100734. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
A Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends in Surgical Approaches for Epilepsy Management.癫痫治疗手术方法近期趋势的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71715. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71715. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: A narrative review of factors predictive of response.迷走神经刺激治疗癫痫:预测反应的因素的叙述性综述
Epilepsia. 2024 Dec;65(12):3441-3456. doi: 10.1111/epi.18153. Epub 2024 Oct 16.