Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9LJ, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Sep;26(5):357-65. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq078. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
Despite the high prevalence of mental illness, mental health remains a low priority in Africa. There has been no investigation of the views of stakeholders in Africa on why this is and what can be done. This paper reports a comparison of the views of stakeholders in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia, focusing on the priority given to mental health by the government at the national and regional/province levels. We conducted semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and used a two-stage approach to analysis: firstly framework analysis in each study country, followed by comparative analysis of the country data. Mental health was largely considered a low priority at national and regional/provincial levels in all four countries. We identified nine factors affecting the priority of mental health, which were grouped into three categories: legitimacy of the problem, feasibility of response and support for response. Respondents put forward a range of experiences and suggestions for increasing the priority given to mental health. We conclude with broad suggestions to raise the priority of mental health. These suggestions are particularly relevant as mental health increases in priority on the international agenda, in order to inform advocacy for increased priority for mental health in Africa.
尽管精神疾病的患病率很高,但精神健康在非洲仍然是一个低优先级事项。目前还没有对非洲利益相关者对这一现象的看法以及可以采取的措施进行调查。本文报告了对加纳、南非、乌干达和赞比亚利益相关者观点的比较,重点关注政府在国家和地区/省级层面上对精神健康的重视程度。我们对主要利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,并采用了两阶段分析方法:首先在每个研究国家进行框架分析,然后对国家数据进行比较分析。在所有四个国家,精神健康在国家和地区/省级层面上都被认为是一个低优先级事项。我们确定了影响精神健康优先级的九个因素,并将其分为三类:问题的合法性、应对的可行性和对应对的支持。受访者提出了一系列增加精神健康关注度的经验和建议。最后,我们提出了提高精神健康优先级的广泛建议。随着精神健康在国际议程上的优先级不断提高,这些建议特别相关,以便为在非洲增加精神健康的优先级提供宣传。