• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

索韦托社区精神病学诊所中的复杂精神药物联合治疗

Complex Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Soweto-based community psychiatry clinics.

作者信息

Mabulwana Lee-Ann, Maaroganye Kagisho

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr J Psychiatr. 2025 Jul 18;31:2424. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v31i0.2424. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v31i0.2424
PMID:40799259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12339778/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic polypharmacy is increasing globally. In South Africa (SA), Complex Psychotropic Polypharmacy (CPP) prevalence is 36.3%. Being on CPP is associated with adverse drug reactions and worsened patient outcomes, but there exists limited knowledge on CPP risk factors in SA.

AIM

To determine CPP prevalence and its associated clinical and sociodemographic factors in a community setting in SA.

SETTING

The study was conducted in five randomly selected community mental health clinics in Soweto township from 01 January 2021 to 31 December 2022.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 348 adult patient records was conducted from January 2021 to December 2022. Data on prescriptions, clinical and sociodemographic variables were extracted. Being on CPP was defined as having 3 or more psychotropics. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with CPP.

RESULTS

The CPP prevalence was 25.3%. The most common CPP combination (26.1%) was oral antipsychotic, long-acting injectable antipsychotic and mood stabiliser prescriptions. Psychiatric diagnosis was significantly associated with CPP, -value = 0.012. The most common adverse drug effect was associated with use of anticholinergic drugs (13.2%) of which 28.3% were on CPP. Those who were widowed or divorced were 4.3 times more likely to be on CPP compared to those never married (single) Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 4.3 (95% CI:1.2-16.1).

CONCLUSION

There is notably high prevalence of CPP. The risk of adverse effects rises with an increase in the number of medications. Evidence-based prescribing and periodic review of medication should be emphasised.

CONTRIBUTION

Increased monitoring of prescribing practices is needed to determine if the practice of Complex psychotropic polypharmacy (CPP) prescription is in line with treatment guidelines for psychiatric diagnosis.

摘要

背景

全球范围内精神药物联合使用的情况在增加。在南非,复杂精神药物联合使用(CPP)的患病率为36.3%。使用CPP与药物不良反应及患者预后恶化相关,但在南非,关于CPP危险因素的了解有限。

目的

确定南非社区环境中CPP的患病率及其相关的临床和社会人口学因素。

地点

该研究于2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日在索韦托镇随机选取的五家社区精神卫生诊所进行。

方法

对2021年1月至2022年12月期间348例成年患者的记录进行回顾性研究。提取了处方、临床和社会人口学变量的数据。使用三种或更多种精神药物被定义为使用CPP。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归来确定与CPP相关的因素。

结果

CPP患病率为25.3%。最常见的CPP组合(26.1%)是口服抗精神病药物、长效注射用抗精神病药物和情绪稳定剂处方。精神科诊断与CPP显著相关,P值 = 0.012。最常见的药物不良反应与使用抗胆碱能药物有关(13.2%),其中28.3%的患者使用CPP。丧偶或离异者使用CPP的可能性是未婚者(单身)的4.3倍,调整后的优势比(AOR) = 4.3(95%置信区间:1.2 - 十六点一)。

结论

CPP的患病率显著较高。药物不良反应的风险随着药物数量的增加而上升。应强调循证处方和定期药物审查。

贡献

需要加强对处方行为的监测,以确定复杂精神药物联合使用(CPP)处方的做法是否符合精神科诊断的治疗指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b8/12339778/df3d91b79aa6/SAJPsy-31-2424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b8/12339778/d2dea00e5836/SAJPsy-31-2424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b8/12339778/df3d91b79aa6/SAJPsy-31-2424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b8/12339778/d2dea00e5836/SAJPsy-31-2424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b8/12339778/df3d91b79aa6/SAJPsy-31-2424-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Complex Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Soweto-based community psychiatry clinics.索韦托社区精神病学诊所中的复杂精神药物联合治疗
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2025 Jul 18;31:2424. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v31i0.2424. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险者的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18;2015(2):CD007989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007989.pub2.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
10
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of psychotropic medications in adults with intellectual disability: a scoping review.成人智力残疾者精神药物管理:范围综述。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2486-2499. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2121853.
2
Prescribing patterns of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in a community setting in South Africa.南非社区环境中长效注射用抗精神病药物的处方模式。
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2022 Jun 30;28:1809. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v28i0.1809. eCollection 2022.
3
Clinical pharmacist interventions in ambulatory psychogeriatric patients with excessive polypharmacy.
临床药师干预门诊老年精神障碍患者过度用药。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 6;12(1):11387. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15657-x.
4
Strengthening of district mental health services in Gauteng Province, South Africa.加强南非豪登省的地区精神卫生服务。
S Afr Med J. 2021 May 31;111(6):538-543. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i6.15633.
5
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Among Patients With Schizophrenia in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗精神病药联合治疗在非洲精神分裂症患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Dec 8;24(12):956-964. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab046.
6
A Systematic Review of Complex Polypharmacy in Bipolar Disorder: Prevalence, Clinical Features, Adherence, and Preliminary Recommendations for Practitioners.一项关于双相情感障碍中复杂药物治疗的系统综述:患病率、临床特征、依从性以及对从业者的初步建议。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 1;82(3):20r13263. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20r13263.
7
Defining polypharmacy: in search of a more comprehensive determination method applied in a tertiary psychiatric hospital.多药联合使用的定义:探寻一种适用于三级精神病医院的更全面的判定方法。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2021 Mar 19;11:20451253211000610. doi: 10.1177/20451253211000610. eCollection 2021.
8
Polypharmacy and psychotropic polypharmacy in adults with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional total population study.成年智力残疾者的多重用药与精神药物多重用药:一项横断面全人群研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Nov;64(11):834-851. doi: 10.1111/jir.12775. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Non-pharmacological interventions for challenging behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analysis.非药物干预对智力残疾成人挑战性行为的效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020 Aug;64(8):561-578. doi: 10.1111/jir.12736. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Psychotropic Polypharmacy in Adults 55 Years or Older: A Risk for Impaired Global Cognition, Executive Function, and Mobility.55岁及以上成年人的精神药物联合使用:对整体认知、执行功能和活动能力受损的风险。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 30;10:1659. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01659. eCollection 2019.