• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项基于人群的纵向研究中,用于预测认知障碍但无痴呆(CIND)向痴呆转化的临床决策树。

Clinical decision trees for predicting conversion from cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) to dementia in a longitudinal population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Feb;26(1):16-25. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq089. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acq089
PMID:21147863
Abstract

The lack of gold standard diagnostic criteria for cognitive impairment in the absence of dementia has resulted in variable nomenclature, case definitions, outcomes, risk factors, and prognostic utilities. Our objective was to elucidate the clinical correlates of conversion to dementia in a longitudinal population-based sample. Using data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging, a machine learning algorithm was used to identify symptoms that best differentiated converting from nonconverting cognitively impaired not demented participants. Poor retrieval was the sole predictor of conversion to dementia over 5 years. This finding suggests that patients with impaired retrieval are at greater risk for progression to dementia at follow-up. Employing significant predictors as markers for ongoing monitoring and assessment, rather than as clinical markers of conversion, is recommended given the less than optimal specificity of the predictive algorithms.

摘要

由于缺乏痴呆症患者认知障碍的金标准诊断标准,导致了命名法、病例定义、结果、风险因素和预后实用性的多样性。我们的目的是在纵向的基于人群的样本中阐明向痴呆症转化的临床相关性。使用来自加拿大健康老龄化研究的数据,机器学习算法被用来识别能够最好地区分从非认知障碍但认知受损的不痴呆参与者中转化的症状。检索能力差是 5 年内转化为痴呆的唯一预测因素。这一发现表明,在随访中,检索能力受损的患者更有可能发展为痴呆。由于预测算法的特异性较差,建议将显著预测因素作为持续监测和评估的标志物,而不是作为转化的临床标志物。

相似文献

1
Clinical decision trees for predicting conversion from cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) to dementia in a longitudinal population-based study.在一项基于人群的纵向研究中,用于预测认知障碍但无痴呆(CIND)向痴呆转化的临床决策树。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Feb;26(1):16-25. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq089. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
2
Neuropsychological prediction of attrition due to death.因死亡导致损耗的神经心理学预测。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 May;29(4):385-94. doi: 10.1080/13803390600726811.
3
Predictive value of mild cognitive impairment for dementia. The influence of case definition and age.轻度认知障碍对痴呆症的预测价值。病例定义和年龄的影响。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;27(2):173-81. doi: 10.1159/000200465. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
4
Prediction of dementia by subjective memory impairment: effects of severity and temporal association with cognitive impairment.主观记忆障碍对痴呆症的预测:严重程度及与认知障碍的时间关联的影响
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;67(4):414-22. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.30.
5
Five-year follow-up of cognitive impairment with no dementia.无痴呆的认知障碍的五年随访
Arch Neurol. 2003 Apr;60(4):577-82. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.4.577.
6
Neuropsychological characteristics of mild vascular cognitive impairment and dementia after stroke.中风后轻度血管性认知障碍和痴呆的神经心理学特征
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;19(11):1053-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.1209.
7
Conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in elderly subjects: a preliminary study in a memory and cognitive disorder unit.老年受试者轻度认知障碍向痴呆的转化:在记忆与认知障碍科的一项初步研究
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2007;44 Suppl 1:233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.01.032.
8
Outcomes of cognitively impaired not demented at 2 years in the Canadian Cohort Study of Cognitive Impairment and Related Dementias.加拿大认知障碍及相关痴呆队列研究中2年时未患痴呆的认知障碍患者的转归情况
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;22(5-6):413-20. doi: 10.1159/000095751. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
9
Temporal relationship between depressive symptoms and cognitive impairment: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging.抑郁症状与认知障碍之间的时间关系:意大利老龄化纵向研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;17(4):899-911. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1111.
10
Differential impact of apathy and depression in the development of dementia in mild cognitive impairment patients.冷漠和抑郁对轻度认知障碍患者痴呆症发展的不同影响。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;27(4):390-8. doi: 10.1159/000210045. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mini-ACE: Validation Study Among Older People in Long-Term Care.迷你简易精神状态检查表:长期护理机构中老年人的验证研究。
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 9;7(1):5. doi: 10.5334/joc.330. eCollection 2024.
2
Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care.进行性神经认知障碍诊断中的当前挑战:文献综述与对初级和二级护理的建议
Brain Sci. 2023 Oct 10;13(10):1443. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13101443.
3
A robust framework to investigate the reliability and stability of explainable artificial intelligence markers of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.
一个用于研究轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病可解释人工智能标志物的可靠性和稳定性的强大框架。
Brain Inform. 2022 Jul 26;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40708-022-00165-5.
4
Multifactorial 10-Year Prior Diagnosis Prediction Model of Dementia.多因素 10 年前痴呆症预测诊断模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6674. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186674.
5
The efficacy of cognitive interventions on the performance of instrumental activities of daily living in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.认知干预对轻度认知障碍或轻度痴呆个体工具性日常生活活动表现的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1135-0.
6
Machine learning and microsimulation techniques on the prognosis of dementia: A systematic literature review.机器学习和微观模拟技术对痴呆症预后的影响:一项系统文献综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179804. eCollection 2017.
7
Spectrum of cognition short of dementia: Framingham Heart Study and Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.认知功能减退但未达痴呆的范围:弗雷明汉心脏研究和梅奥诊所衰老研究
Neurology. 2015 Nov 10;85(19):1712-21. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002100. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
How well do MCI criteria predict progression to severe cognitive impairment and dementia?MCI 标准预测向严重认知障碍和痴呆进展的效果如何?
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014 Apr-Jun;28(2):113-21. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000018.