University of Toronto, University Health Network, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):362-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.7305. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group phase III Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial comparing radical prostatectomy (RP) and brachytherapy (BT) closed after 2 years due to poor accrual. We report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at a mean of 5.3 years for 168 trial-eligible men who either chose or were randomly assigned to RP or BT following a multidisciplinary educational session.
After initial lack of accrual, a multidisciplinary educational session was introduced for eligible patients. In all, 263 men attended 47 sessions. Of those, 34 consented to random assignment, 62 chose RP, and 94 chose BT. Five years later, these 190 men underwent HRQOL evaluation by using the cancer-specific 50-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, the Short Form 12 Physical Component Score, and Short Form 12 Mental Component Score. Response rate was 88.4%. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare summary scores between the two interventions.
Of 168 survey responders, 60.7% had BT (9.5% randomly assigned) and 39.3% had RP (9.5% randomly assigned). Median age was 61.4 years for BT and 59.4 for RP (P = .05). Median follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 3.2 to 6.5 years). For BT versus RP, there was no difference in bowel or hormonal domains, but men treated with BT scored better in urinary (91.8 v 88.1; P = .02) and sexual (52.5 v 39.2; P = .001) domains, and in patient satisfaction (93.6 v 76.9; P < .001).
Although treatment allocation was random in only 19%, all patients received identical information in a multidisciplinary setting before selecting RP, BT, or random assignment. HRQOL evaluated 3.2 to 6.5 years after treatment showed an advantage for BT in urinary and sexual domains and in patient satisfaction.
美国外科医师学院肿瘤学组的 III 期前列腺切除术与间质内放射干预试验(Surgical Prostatectomy Versus Interstitial Radiation Intervention Trial)比较了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和近距离放射治疗(BT),由于入组人数不足,在 2 年后关闭。我们报告了在经过多学科教育课程后,选择 RP 或 BT 的 168 名符合条件的男性在 2 年的中位随访时间为 5.3 年的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。
在初始入组人数不足的情况下,为符合条件的患者引入了多学科教育课程。共有 263 名男性参加了 47 次课程。其中,34 名患者同意随机分组,62 名患者选择 RP,94 名患者选择 BT。5 年后,这 190 名男性接受了癌症特异性 50 项扩展前列腺癌指数综合评分、简短健康调查量表 12 项物理成分评分和简短健康调查量表 12 项精神成分评分的 HRQOL 评估。反应率为 88.4%。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较两种干预措施的综合评分。
在 168 名接受调查的患者中,60.7%接受了 BT(9.5%随机分配),39.3%接受了 RP(9.5%随机分配)。BT 的中位年龄为 61.4 岁,RP 为 59.4 岁(P =.05)。中位随访时间为 5.2 年(范围 3.2 至 6.5 年)。BT 与 RP 相比,在肠功能和激素功能方面没有差异,但接受 BT 治疗的男性在尿功能(91.8 对 88.1;P =.02)和性功能(52.5 对 39.2;P =.001)以及患者满意度(93.6 对 76.9;P <.001)方面得分更好。
尽管仅 19%的患者是随机分配的,但所有患者在选择 RP、BT 或随机分配之前,都在多学科环境中接受了相同的信息。治疗后 3.2 至 6.5 年评估的 HRQOL 显示 BT 在尿功能、性功能和患者满意度方面具有优势。