• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国急诊科快速序贯诱导麻醉:全国普查。

Rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in UK emergency departments: a national census.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Mar;28(3):217-20. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.085423. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2009.085423
PMID:21149865
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation (RSI) is an integral part of modern emergency care. Previously, emergency department (ED) RSI has been provided by anaesthetists, but UK emergency physicians are increasingly developing this skill. We undertook a 2-week census of ED RSI to establish a baseline of current practice.

METHODS

All 115 UK College of Emergency Medicine airway leads were contacted and asked to return anonymised data on every drug-assisted intubation occurring in their ED during a 2-week period in September 2008. The number of RSIs and also the total number of ED attendances during the same period were requested.

RESULTS

Complete data were returned from 64 EDs (56%). The total number of patients undergoing RSI was 218, with an incidence of 0.12%, or approximately one in every 800 ED attendances. Anaesthetic staff undertook 80% of ED RSIs, predominantly senior anaesthetic trainees of specialist trainee year 3 (ST3) or above. During normal office hours 74% of these anaesthetic trainees were supervised during the procedure, with a significant fall in supervision rates to 15% outside normal office hours (p<0.00001 on χ(2) testing).

DISCUSSION

The 0.12% incidence of ED RSI is consistent with previous studies, as is the finding that only 20% are performed by emergency physicians. The relative infrequency of ED RSI and increasing pool of staff has important implications for training and skills maintenance. Despite the acknowledged difficulty of this technique, nearly half of all ED RSIs are done by unsupervised trainees.

摘要

介绍

快速序列诱导麻醉和气管插管(RSI)是现代急救护理的一个组成部分。以前,急诊部(ED)的 RSI 是由麻醉师提供的,但英国急诊医师越来越多地发展这一技能。我们进行了为期两周的 ED RSI 普查,以建立当前实践的基线。

方法

联系了所有 115 名英国急诊医学学院气道负责人,并要求他们在 2008 年 9 月的两周内,返回其 ED 中每次药物辅助插管的匿名数据。还要求提供同期进行的 RSI 次数和 ED 就诊总数。

结果

从 64 个 ED (56%)返回了完整的数据。接受 RSI 的患者总数为 218 例,发生率为 0.12%,即每 800 次 ED 就诊中约有一次。麻醉人员进行了 80%的 ED RSI,主要是专科培训 3 年级(ST3)及以上的高级麻醉培训生。在正常办公时间内,74%的麻醉培训生在手术过程中接受监督,而在正常办公时间外,监督率显著下降至 15%(χ(2)检验,p<0.00001)。

讨论

ED RSI 的发生率为 0.12%,与之前的研究一致,只有 20%是由急诊医师进行的。ED RSI 的相对罕见性和不断增加的工作人员数量对培训和技能维护具有重要意义。尽管这项技术具有公认的难度,但近一半的 ED RSI 是由未经监督的培训生完成的。

相似文献

1
Rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia in UK emergency departments: a national census.英国急诊科快速序贯诱导麻醉:全国普查。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Mar;28(3):217-20. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.085423. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
2
Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: the Scottish district hospital perspective.急诊科的气管插管:苏格兰地区医院的视角
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):394-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.041988.
3
Training and competency in rapid sequence intubation: the perspective from a Scottish teaching hospital emergency department.快速序贯插管的培训和能力:来自苏格兰教学医院急诊部的观点。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Sep;28(9):775-7. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.096396. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
4
An observational survey of emergency department rapid sequence intubation.急诊科快速顺序插管的观察性调查。
Emerg Med J. 2001 Sep;18(5):343-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.5.343.
5
Tracheal intubation in an urban emergency department in Scotland: a prospective, observational study of 3738 intubations.苏格兰城市急诊科的气管插管:3738 例插管的前瞻性观察研究。
Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
6
Rapid sequence intubation of trauma patients in Scotland.苏格兰创伤患者的快速顺序插管法
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1123-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000109066.62811.8a.
7
Rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: 5 year trends.急诊科快速顺序插管:5年趋势
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):54-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.019398.
8
Underdosing of midazolam in emergency endotracheal intubation.急诊气管插管时咪达唑仑剂量不足
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):329-38. doi: 10.1197/aemj.10.4.329.
9
Tracheal intubation in the critically ill: a multi-centre national study of practice and complications.危重症患者的气管插管:一项多中心全国性实践和并发症研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2012 May;108(5):792-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer504. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
10
Prehospital anaesthesia by a physician and paramedic critical care team in Southwest England.英格兰西南部的医生和护理人员急救医疗团队的院前麻醉。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;20(6):382-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835b08b7.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a consensus guideline from the Project for Universal Management of Airways and international airway societies.预防未识别的食管插管:气道普遍管理项目和国际气道学会的共识指南。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Dec;77(12):1395-1415. doi: 10.1111/anae.15817. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
The Success Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department of Tertiary Care Hospital in Ethiopia, One-Year Retrospective Study.埃塞俄比亚三级护理医院急诊科气管插管成功率的一年回顾性研究。
Emerg Med Int. 2021 Mar 19;2021:9590859. doi: 10.1155/2021/9590859. eCollection 2021.
3
Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations.
紧急气道管理:对94例气管插管的操作、成功率及不良事件的研究
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):58-61. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Optimising remote site airway management kit dump using the SCRAM bag-a randomised controlled trial.使用SCRAM包优化远程站点气道管理工具包倾倒——一项随机对照试验
Perioper Med (Lond). 2020 Apr 14;9:11. doi: 10.1186/s13741-020-00140-w. eCollection 2020.
5
A randomised controlled trial of cognitive aids for emergency airway equipment preparation in a Paediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科用于紧急气道设备准备的认知辅助工具的随机对照试验。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 27;24:8. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0201-z.
6
Debriefing to improve outcomes from critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.从重症疾病中恢复:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep;39(9):1513-23. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2951-7. Epub 2013 Jun 11.