Suppr超能文献

紧急气道管理:对94例气管插管的操作、成功率及不良事件的研究

Emergency Airway Management: A Look into the Practice, Rate of Success, and Adverse Events of 94 Endotracheal Intubations.

作者信息

Fadhlillah Fiqry, Bury Sarah, Grocholski Ewa, Dean Mike, Refson Ali

机构信息

Department of Emergency, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):58-61. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_100_19. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Endotracheal intubation in the critically unwell is a life-saving procedure, frequently performed in the emergency department (ED). The 4 National Audit Project (NAP4) of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and Difficult Airway Society, however, highlighted the deficiencies that could have led to serious harm. In direct response to NAP4, a 2018 guideline was published on the management of intubations in critically ill adults.

AIMS

This study describes the current practice of endotracheal intubation, in comparison to the published 2018 guideline.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A retrospective observational study in an ED of a district general hospital in Greater London.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adult attendances from September 1, 2017, to September 1, 2018 (>18 years old) fulfilling the search criteria were reviewed, producing 1553 case notes. These cases were individually reviewed by the authors.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

There were 94 intubations, male to female ratio 1.8:1. The most common indication was for airway protection ( = 35), followed by respiratory failure ( = 23). There were 31 first-pass intubation successes. Intensivists performed most of the intubations ( = 66), followed by anesthetists ( = 13), and ED physicians ( = 10), but with no significant difference between the response rates of ED and external physicians ( = 0.0477). Propofol was the induction drug of choice ( = 37), with rocuronium the paralyzing agent of choice ( = 42). Altogether, there were eight complications reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides an overview of the intubation practices in a single-center ED. Non-ED physicians perform the majority of intubations, with a variety of induction and paralyzing agents being used. It adds to the growing call for better standardization and provision of care to patients with a deteriorating airway and the continued auditing of practice.

摘要

背景

对危重症患者进行气管插管是一项挽救生命的操作,常在急诊科(ED)进行。然而,皇家麻醉师学院和困难气道协会的第4次全国审计项目(NAP4)强调了可能导致严重伤害的不足之处。作为对NAP4的直接回应,2018年发布了关于危重症成年患者插管管理的指南。

目的

本研究描述了气管插管的当前实践,并与2018年发布的指南进行比较。

设置与设计

在大伦敦一家地区综合医院的急诊科进行的回顾性观察研究。

研究对象与方法

对2017年9月1日至2018年9月1日期间符合搜索标准的成年就诊患者(年龄>18岁)进行回顾,共产生1553份病例记录。作者对这些病例进行了逐一审查。

所用统计分析方法

曼-惠特尼U检验。

结果

共进行了94次插管,男女比例为1.8:1。最常见的指征是气道保护(n = 35),其次是呼吸衰竭(n = 23)。首次插管成功31例。重症监护医生进行了大部分插管操作(n = 66),其次是麻醉医生(n = 13)和急诊科医生(n = 10),但急诊科医生和外部医生的成功率无显著差异(P = 0.0477)。丙泊酚是首选的诱导药物(n = 37),罗库溴铵是首选的肌松剂(n = 42)。总共报告了8例并发症。

结论

本研究概述了单中心急诊科的插管实践。非急诊科医生进行了大部分插管操作,使用了多种诱导和肌松药物。这进一步呼吁更好地规范气道恶化患者的护理,并持续对实践进行审计。

相似文献

8
Evaluation of endotracheal intubations in the emergency department of a tertiary care facility.三级医疗设施急诊科气管插管的评估
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 27;23(2):82-87. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_268_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults.《成人危重症患者气管插管管理指南》
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验