Suppr超能文献

天然辐射源:现有还是计划中的照射情况?

Naturally occurring radiation sources: existing or planned exposure situation?

作者信息

Hedemann-Jensen Per

机构信息

Danish Decommissioning, Roskilde, Denmark.

出版信息

J Radiol Prot. 2010 Dec;30(4):781-7. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/30/4/N01. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

Abstract

After more than fifteen years of application, ICRP Publication 60 has been revised. The revision was based upon the concept of 'controllable dose' as the dose or sum of doses to an individual from a particular source that can reasonably be controlled by whatever means. The new recommendations have been published as ICRP Publication 103. The European Basic Safety Standards as well as the International Basic Safety Standards are currently under revision as a result of the new recommendations from ICRP. According to the ICRP, there have been indications that some changes to the structure and terminology of the system of protection were desirable in order to improve clarity and utility. In particular the distinction between practices and interventions may not have been clearly understood and the ICRP now recognises three types of exposure situations, which replace the previous categorisation into practices and interventions. These exposure situations are intended to cover the entire range of exposure situations: (1) planned exposure, (2) existing exposure and (3) emergency exposure. There are situations of exposure to naturally occurring radiation sources in different occupations, e.g. exposure to radon and radon progeny in workplaces other than where the exposure is required by or is directly related to the work and aircrew exposed to cosmic radiation. In the European (Euratom) and the International Basic Safety Standards, these exposure situations are treated conceptually different-either as a planned exposure situation or as an existing exposure situation. This note reviews the change of exposure situations from Publication 60 to Publication 103 and the implications for the revision of both the International and the European Basic Safety Standards. The paper draws some conclusions on the classification of the exposure situations in the two basic safety standards based on a logical interpretation of the ICRP recommendations. It is recommended that the European and the International Basic Safety Standards should be harmonised to avoid confusion among users of the standards.

摘要

经过十五年多的应用,国际放射防护委员会第60号出版物已进行修订。此次修订基于“可控制剂量”的概念,即来自特定源的、可通过任何合理手段进行控制的个人剂量或剂量总和。新的建议已作为国际放射防护委员会第103号出版物发布。由于国际放射防护委员会的新建议,欧洲基本安全标准以及国际基本安全标准目前正在修订中。根据国际放射防护委员会的说法,有迹象表明,为了提高清晰度和实用性,防护体系的结构和术语需要进行一些更改。特别是,实践与干预之间的区别可能没有得到清晰理解,国际放射防护委员会现在认识到三种照射情况,取代了之前分为实践和干预的分类。这些照射情况旨在涵盖所有照射情况:(1)计划照射,(2)现存照射和(3)应急照射。在不同职业中存在接触天然辐射源的情况,例如在并非工作要求或与工作直接相关的场所接触氡及其子体,以及机组人员接触宇宙辐射。在欧洲(欧洲原子能共同体)和国际基本安全标准中,这些照射情况在概念上的处理方式不同——要么作为计划照射情况,要么作为现存照射情况。本说明回顾了从第60号出版物到第103号出版物照射情况的变化以及对国际和欧洲基本安全标准修订的影响。本文基于对国际放射防护委员会建议的逻辑解释,就两项基本安全标准中照射情况的分类得出了一些结论。建议协调欧洲和国际基本安全标准,以避免标准使用者之间的混淆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验