Rawdon T G, Tana T, Thornton R N, McKenzie J S, Stanislawek W L, Kittelberger R, Geale D, Stevenson M A, Gerber N, Cork S C
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Biosecurity New Zealand, Upper Hutt , New Zealand.
N Z Vet J. 2010 Dec;58(6):292-8. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2010.69756.
To determine the status of avian influenza (AI) virus sub-types H5 and H7 of New Zealand's commercial chicken and turkey farms.
A cross-sectional serological survey, stratified by production sector, used a sample frame defined by those farms registered with the Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand (PIANZ) or the Egg Producers Federation of New Zealand (EPF). Sectors included were chicken broiler, caged/barn layer, free-range layer, pullet rearer and turkey broiler. The survey used a between- and within-farm design prevalence of 5% (95% confidence for chickens, 99% confidence for turkeys) and 30% (95% confidence), respectively, of AI virus subtypes H5 and H7. The epidemiological unit was the farm for the free-range layer sector, and the individual shed/barn for the other sectors. Serum samples were screened using a commercial generic influenza A indirect ELISA; positive samples were subjected to haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) testing for AI virus subtypes H5 and H7. A comprehensive investigation, that included widespread serological and antigenic screening, was carried out on all farms identified with serum reactors to either the H5 or H7 virus subtype.
A total of 4,180 blood samples from 167 chicken and 10 turkey farms were collected and tested using ELISA. Positive ELISA results were returned from 26 farms, comprising 10 caged/barn layer, 14 free-range layer and two turkey (shed-raised) broiler farms. HI testing of ELISA-positive sera for the H7 subtype virus identified no positive sera in any sector. Reactors to the H5 subtype virus were limited to three free-range layer chicken farms; each farm returned a single serum reactor. Follow-up investigations on these free-range farms identified evidence of historic exposure to the H5 subtype virus on one farm, and concluded that the serum reactors identified in the initial sampling round on the other two farms were non-specific (false-positive) reactions.
The survey found no evidence of active infection with notifiable AI viruses, and provided evidence of absence of exposure to AI virus subtypes H5 and H7 in the chicken broiler, caged/barn layer, turkey broiler and pullet-rearer sectors at a between- and within-farm prevalence of 5% and 30%, respectively, with 95% confidence. The results established commercial free-range layer farms as a risk sector for exposure to notifiable AI virus.
确定新西兰商业性养鸡场和火鸡场禽流感(AI)病毒H5和H7亚型的感染状况。
采用横断面血清学调查,按生产部门分层,样本框架由在新西兰家禽业协会(PIANZ)或新西兰蛋鸡生产者联合会(EPF)注册的农场确定。调查的部门包括肉鸡场、笼养/舍饲蛋鸡场、散养蛋鸡场、育雏场和火鸡场。该调查在农场间和农场内的设计患病率分别为5%(鸡的95%置信度,火鸡的99%置信度)和30%(95%置信度)的AI病毒H5和H7亚型。散养蛋鸡场的流行病学单位是农场,其他部门的流行病学单位是单个鸡舍/禽舍。血清样本采用商用通用甲型流感间接ELISA进行筛查;阳性样本进行H5和H7亚型AI病毒的血凝抑制(HI)试验。对所有检测出H5或H7病毒亚型血清反应阳性的农场进行了全面调查,包括广泛的血清学和抗原性筛查。
共采集了来自167个养鸡场和10个火鸡场的4180份血样,并用ELISA进行检测。26个农场的ELISA检测结果呈阳性,其中包括10个笼养/舍饲蛋鸡场、14个散养蛋鸡场和2个火鸡(舍饲)场。对ELISA检测为H7亚型病毒阳性的血清进行HI试验,未在任何部门检测到阳性血清。H5亚型病毒的血清反应阳性仅局限于3个散养蛋鸡场;每个农场只有一份血清反应阳性。对这些散养农场的后续调查发现,其中一个农场有过去感染H5亚型病毒的证据,而另外两个农场在首轮采样中检测到的血清反应阳性被判定为非特异性(假阳性)反应。
该调查未发现有感染应通报AI病毒的证据,证明在农场间和农场内患病率分别为5%和30%(95%置信度)的情况下,肉鸡场、笼养/舍饲蛋鸡场、火鸡场和育雏场未接触过AI病毒H5和H7亚型。结果表明,商业性散养蛋鸡场是接触应通报AI病毒的风险部门。