Suppr超能文献

Chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer with performance status 2.

作者信息

Shitara Kohei, Muro Kei, Matsuo Keitaro, Ura Takashi, Takahari Daisuke, Yokota Tomoya, Sawaki Akira, Kawai Hiroki, Ito Seiji, Munakata Masaki, Sakata Yuh

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology.

出版信息

Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009 Nov;3(6):220-4.

Abstract

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 657 patients with advanced gastric cancer who received first-line chemotherapy. Baseline patient characteristics and treatment results were compared between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-1 and PS 2 patients.

RESULTS

Prior to beginning first-line chemotherapy, 513, 112, and 32 patients were PS 0-1, PS 2, and PS 3-4, respectively. Patients with massive ascites (42% vs. 3%; P < .001) or inability to eat (39% vs. 4%; P < .001) were more likely to be PS 2 than PS 0-1. Significantly fewer PS 2 patients received first-line chemotherapy regimens containing oral agents (40% vs. 77%; P < .001) or combination chemotherapy (19% vs. 40%; P < .001) compared to PS 0-1 patients. Median survival time was significantly shorter in PS 2 patients (5.8 vs. 13.9 months; P < .001). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that use of oral agents was associated with a better prognosis in PS 0-1 patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.97, P = .03), while it was associated with poorer survival in PS 2 patients (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.0-2.3, P = .046).

CONCLUSION

Advanced gastric cancer patients with PS 2 not only had a poorer prognosis but also differed in several baseline characteristics compared to PS 0-1 patients. These results indicate that additional clinical trials that specifically target gastric cancer patients with PS 2 may be required to evaluate optimal treatment regimens for this patient population.

摘要

相似文献

2
5
Cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with poor performance status: A retrospective analysis from routine clinical practice.
Curr Probl Cancer. 2020 Jun;44(3):100550. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2020.100550. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
Cisplatin- Versus Non-Cisplatin-based First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Previously Treated With Perioperative Cisplatin.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Aug;14(4):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
7
Improvement of oral intake following chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with an inability to eat.
Oncology. 2010;79(3-4):211-8. doi: 10.1159/000320759. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Eligibility criteria in phase 3 randomized controlled trials in gastric cancer.
Gastric Cancer. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s10120-025-01653-3.
6
Real‑world challenge for clinicians treating advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (Review).
Int J Oncol. 2021 May;58(5). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5202. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer: experience from an Indian tertiary cancer center.
Med Oncol. 2014 Oct;31(10):138. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0138-x. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

4
S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial.
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):215-21. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70035-4. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
5
Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):36-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073149.
8
Weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.
Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(1):14-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-005-0351-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验