• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病和糖耐量受损(DETECT-2)筛查和早期检测策略的评估:芬兰糖尿病风险评分对 2 型糖尿病发病预测的更新。

The Evaluation of Screening and Early Detection Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (DETECT-2) update of the Finnish diabetes risk score for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2011 May;54(5):1004-12. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1990-7. Epub 2010 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00125-010-1990-7
PMID:21153531
Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Finnish diabetes risk questionnaire is a widely used, simple tool for identification of those at risk for drug-treated type 2 diabetes. We updated the risk questionnaire by using clinically diagnosed and screen-detected type 2 diabetes instead of drug-treated diabetes as an endpoint and by considering additional predictors.

METHODS

Data from 18,301 participants in studies of the Evaluation of Screening and Early Detection Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (DETECT-2) project with baseline and follow-up information on oral glucose tolerance status were included. Incidence of type 2 diabetes within 5 years was used as the outcome variable. Improvement in discrimination and classification of the logistic regression model was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and by the net reclassification improvement. Internal validation was by bootstrapping techniques.

RESULTS

Of the 18,301 participants, 844 developed type 2 diabetes in a period of 5 years (4.6%). The Finnish risk score had an area under the ROC curve of 0.742 (95% CI 0.726-0.758). Re-estimation of the regression coefficients improved the area under the ROC curve to 0.766 (95% CI 0.750-0.783). Additional items such as male sex, smoking and family history of diabetes (parent, sibling or both) improved the area under the ROC curve and net reclassification. Bootstrapping showed good internal validity.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The predictive value of the original Finnish risk questionnaire could be improved by adding information on sex, smoking and family history of diabetes. The DETECT-2 update of the Finnish diabetes risk questionnaire is an adequate and robust predictor for future screen-detected and clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes in Europid populations.

摘要

目的/假设:芬兰糖尿病风险问卷是一种广泛使用的、简单的工具,用于识别有药物治疗 2 型糖尿病风险的人群。我们通过使用临床诊断和筛查发现的 2 型糖尿病代替药物治疗的糖尿病作为终点,并考虑了其他预测因素,对风险问卷进行了更新。

方法

该研究纳入了评估 2 型糖尿病和糖耐量受损筛查和早期检测策略(DETECT-2)项目中 18301 名参与者的数据,这些参与者具有基线和随访时口服葡萄糖耐量状态的信息。5 年内发生 2 型糖尿病的发生率作为结局变量。通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积和净重新分类改善来评估逻辑回归模型的区分度和分类能力的改善。内部验证采用自举技术。

结果

在 18301 名参与者中,844 人在 5 年内发生了 2 型糖尿病(4.6%)。芬兰风险评分的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.742(95%CI 0.726-0.758)。重新估计回归系数可将 ROC 曲线下面积提高至 0.766(95%CI 0.750-0.783)。增加男性、吸烟和糖尿病家族史(父母、兄弟姐妹或两者都有)等额外项目可以提高 ROC 曲线下面积和净重新分类。自举法显示了良好的内部有效性。

结论/解释:通过添加性别、吸烟和糖尿病家族史信息,可以提高原始芬兰风险问卷的预测价值。DETECT-2 更新后的芬兰糖尿病风险问卷是欧洲人群未来筛查发现和临床诊断的 2 型糖尿病的一种充分且稳健的预测因子。

相似文献

1
The Evaluation of Screening and Early Detection Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance (DETECT-2) update of the Finnish diabetes risk score for prediction of incident type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病和糖耐量受损(DETECT-2)筛查和早期检测策略的评估:芬兰糖尿病风险评分对 2 型糖尿病发病预测的更新。
Diabetologia. 2011 May;54(5):1004-12. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1990-7. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
2
Cross-sectional evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score: a tool to identify undetected type 2 diabetes, abnormal glucose tolerance and metabolic syndrome.芬兰糖尿病风险评分的横断面评估:一种用于识别未被检测出的2型糖尿病、糖耐量异常和代谢综合征的工具。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2005 May;2(2):67-72. doi: 10.3132/dvdr.2005.011.
3
Development of a screening tool using electronic health records for undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose detection in the Slovenian population.利用电子健康记录开发一种用于筛查斯洛文尼亚人群中未诊断出的2型糖尿病和空腹血糖受损的工具。
Diabet Med. 2018 May;35(5):640-649. doi: 10.1111/dme.13605. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
Two risk score models for predicting incident Type 2 diabetes in Japan.两种用于预测日本 2 型糖尿病发病风险的评分模型。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jan;29(1):107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03376.x.
5
The product of fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides improves risk prediction of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Koreans.空腹血糖与甘油三酯的乘积可改善韩国中年人群2型糖尿病的风险预测。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 May 30;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0259-x.
6
Use of the diabetes risk score for opportunistic screening of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance: the IGLOO (Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Long-Term Outcomes Observational) study.使用糖尿病风险评分对未诊断的糖尿病和糖耐量受损进行机会性筛查:IGLOO(糖耐量受损与长期结局观察)研究
Diabetes Care. 2005 May;28(5):1187-94. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1187.
7
Update of the German Diabetes Risk Score and external validation in the German MONICA/KORA study.德国糖尿病风险评分的更新及在德国MONICA/KORA研究中的外部验证
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;104(3):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
The validity of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score for the prediction of the incidence of coronary heart disease and stroke, and total mortality.芬兰糖尿病风险评分对冠心病和中风发病率及总死亡率预测的有效性。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Oct;12(5):451-8. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000174793.31812.21.
9
Identification of persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: do we need the oral glucose tolerance test?2型糖尿病高危人群的识别:我们是否需要口服葡萄糖耐量试验?
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 16;136(8):575-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00006.
10
Development and validation of a risk-score model for subjects with impaired glucose tolerance for the assessment of the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus-The STOP-NIDDM risk-score.用于评估 2 型糖尿病风险的葡萄糖耐量受损患者风险评分模型的开发和验证——STOP-NIDDM 风险评分。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;87(2):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of finnish diabetes risk score for screening undiagnosed diabetes and hyperglycemia in Chinese adults.芬兰糖尿病风险评分在中国成年人中用于筛查未诊断糖尿病和高血糖的适用性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 7;20(7):e0326914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326914. eCollection 2025.
2
Camp-style lifestyle modification program (CAMP) for diabetes prevention among rural women with prior GDM: study protocol for a three-arm cluster hybrid type 2 randomized controlled trial.农村妊娠期糖尿病妇女参与的糖尿病预防 Camp 式生活方式改良方案(CAMP):一项三臂簇集型 2 型随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 20;24(1):2570. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20080-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A simple risk score using routine data for predicting cardiovascular disease in primary care.基于常规数据的简单风险评分模型用于预测初级保健中的心血管疾病。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Aug;60(577):e327-34. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X515098.
2
Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QDScore.预测英格兰和威尔士2型糖尿病风险:QDScore的前瞻性推导与验证
BMJ. 2009 Mar 17;338:b880. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b880.
3
A prediction model for type 2 diabetes risk among Chinese people.中国人2型糖尿病风险预测模型。
External validation of three diabetes prediction scores in a Spanish cohort: does adding high risk for depression improve the validation of the FINDRISC score (FINDRISC-MOOD)?
三种糖尿病预测评分在西班牙队列中的外部验证:在 FINDRISC 评分(FINDRISC-MOOD)中增加抑郁高风险是否能提高验证效果?
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 6;14(6):e083121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083121.
4
A non-invasive risk score including skin autofluorescence predicts diabetes risk in the general population.一项包含皮肤自发荧光的非侵入性风险评分可预测普通人群的糖尿病风险。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 16;12(1):21794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26313-9.
5
Accuracy of Machine Learning Classification Models for the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Survey and Meta-Analysis Approach.机器学习分类模型预测 2 型糖尿病的准确性:系统调查和荟萃分析方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 1;19(21):14280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114280.
6
The 6-Month Efficacy of an Intensive Lifestyle Modification Program on Type 2 Diabetes Risk Among Rural Women with Prior Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.强化生活方式干预方案对农村妊娠期糖尿病妇女 6 个月时 2 型糖尿病发病风险的影响:一项整群随机对照临床试验。
Prev Sci. 2022 Oct;23(7):1156-1168. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01392-2. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Development of Various Diabetes Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Techniques.使用机器学习技术开发各种糖尿病预测模型。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Jul;46(4):650-657. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0115. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Markers Associated with Fasting Serum Insulin and Urinary Albumin Excretion Independent of Fasting Plasma Glucose.与空腹血清胰岛素和尿白蛋白排泄相关的非酒精性脂肪性肝病标志物,独立于空腹血糖。
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):3161. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103161.
9
Agreement between Type 2 Diabetes Risk Scales in a Caucasian Population: A Systematic Review and Report.白种人群中2型糖尿病风险评估量表的一致性:系统评价与报告
J Clin Med. 2020 May 20;9(5):1546. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051546.
10
Validity of the FINDRISC as a prediction tool for diabetes in a contemporary Norwegian population: a 10-year follow-up of the HUNT study.FINDRISC 在当代挪威人群中预测糖尿病的有效性:HUNT 研究的 10 年随访。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Nov 28;7(1):e000769. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000769. eCollection 2019.
Diabetologia. 2009 Mar;52(3):443-50. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1232-4. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
4
[Finnish questionnaire reasonably good predictor of the incidence of diabetes in The Netherlands].[芬兰问卷是荷兰糖尿病发病率的合理良好预测指标]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Nov 1;152(44):2418-24.
5
Sibling and parental history in type 2 diabetes risk among ethnic Chinese: the Chin-Shan Community Cardiovascular Cohort Study.中国汉族人群2型糖尿病风险中的家族史与父母病史:金山社区心血管队列研究
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Dec;15(6):657-62. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32830fe451.
6
Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes.除常见风险因素外,基因型评分对2型糖尿病的预测作用
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 20;359(21):2208-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804742.
7
Stepwise screening for diabetes identifies people with high but modifiable coronary heart disease risk. The ADDITION study.逐步筛查糖尿病可识别出冠心病风险高但可改变的人群。ADDITION研究。
Diabetologia. 2008 Jul;51(7):1127-34. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1013-0. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
8
Determinants for the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.芬兰糖尿病预防研究中生活方式干预效果的决定因素。
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):857-62. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2162. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
9
Family history and prevalence of diabetes in the U.S. population: the 6-year results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2004).美国人群中糖尿病的家族史及患病率:国家健康与营养检查调查(1999 - 2004年)的6年结果
Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2517-22. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0720. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
10
Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.评估新标志物的附加预测能力:从ROC曲线下面积到重新分类及其他。
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.2929.