Mäntylä Timo, Rönnlund Michael, Kliegel Matthias
Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Sweden.
Appl Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct;17(4):289-98. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2010.525090.
This study examined metamemory in relation to three basic executive functions (set shifting, working memory updating, and response inhibition) measured as latent variables. Young adults (Experiment 1) and middle-aged adults (Experiment 2) completed a set of executive functioning tasks and the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ). In Experiment 1, source recall and face recognition tasks were included as indicators of objective memory performance. In both experiments, analyses of the executive functioning data yielded a two-factor solution, with the updating and inhibition tasks constituting a common factor and the shifting tasks a separate factor. Self-reported memory problems showed low predictive validity, but subjective and objective memory performance were related to different components of executive functioning. In both experiments, set shifting, but not updating and inhibition, was related to PRMQ, whereas source recall showed the opposite pattern of correlations in Experiment 1. These findings suggest that metamemorial judgments reflect selective effects of executive functioning and that individual differences in mental flexibility contribute to self-beliefs of efficacy.
本研究考察了与作为潜在变量测量的三种基本执行功能(定势转换、工作记忆更新和反应抑制)相关的元记忆。年轻成年人(实验1)和中年成年人(实验2)完成了一组执行功能任务以及前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷(PRMQ)。在实验1中,源记忆回忆和面部识别任务被作为客观记忆表现的指标。在两个实验中,对执行功能数据的分析产生了一个双因素解决方案,其中更新和抑制任务构成一个共同因素,而定势转换任务构成一个单独因素。自我报告的记忆问题显示出较低的预测效度,但主观和客观记忆表现与执行功能的不同组成部分相关。在两个实验中,定势转换与PRMQ相关,而更新和抑制则不然,而在实验1中,源记忆回忆显示出相反的相关模式。这些发现表明,元记忆判断反映了执行功能的选择性影响,并且心理灵活性的个体差异有助于自我效能信念。