Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011 Mar;30(3):673-81. doi: 10.1002/etc.433. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
Reports of the intense (artificial) sweetener sucralose (1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructo-furanosyl 4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside) in various environmental compartments have led to speculations about biological effects in nontarget species living in areas receiving discharges from anthropogenic activities. We have, as the first step in the risk assessment of this compound, conducted bioaccumulation studies in the freshwater alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, the crustacean Daphnia magna, and zebrafish (Danio rerio). The freshwater algae and the daphnid tests were performed using a 48-h static exposure system, whereas the zebrafish test was performed using a 48-h semi static exposure system followed by 48 h flow-through of clean water for the depuration phase. All three studies were conducted with two exposure concentrations (10 and 100 mg/L), and the concentrations of sucralose in water and biota were verified by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The studies showed that uptake of sucralose was assumed to achieve a steady state within the first 48 h, and the bioconcentration factor at the assumed steady state (BCF(SS) ) was calculated to be less than 1 for algae and between 1.6 to 2.2 for the daphnids. The fish BCF(SS), assumed to occur between 24 to 48 hours, were calculated to be less than 1 for both concentrations tested. A first-order one-compartment (uptake phase) and a first-order two-compartment (elimination phase) model characterized the uptake and depuration kinetics in zebrafish (k(1)=0.027-0.038/h and k(2)=0.206-0.222/h, t(95)=13.5 to 14.6 h, t(50)=3.1 to 3.3 h, and BCF(kinetic)=0.4 to 0.9). The current study shows that sucralose does not bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms from different tiers of the food web, and that the BCF's obtained were considerably lower than the criteria set to identify persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances (i.e., BCF ≥ 2,000).
报告称,在各种环境介质中存在强烈的(人工)甜味剂三氯蔗糖(1,6-二氯-1,6-二脱氧-β-D-呋喃果糖基 4-氯-4-脱氧-α-D-半乳糖吡喃糖苷),这引发了人们对生活在受人为活动排放影响地区的非目标物种的生物效应的猜测。作为对该化合物进行风险评估的第一步,我们在淡水藻类假鱼腥藻、甲壳类动物大型蚤和斑马鱼(Danio rerio)中进行了生物积累研究。淡水藻类和大型蚤测试使用 48 小时静态暴露系统进行,而斑马鱼测试使用 48 小时半静态暴露系统进行,随后在净化阶段用 48 小时清洁水进行水流通。这三项研究均使用了两个暴露浓度(10 和 100mg/L),并通过液相色谱/质谱法验证了水中和生物体内的三氯蔗糖浓度。研究表明,在最初的 48 小时内,三氯蔗糖的吸收被认为达到了稳定状态,并且在假定的稳定状态下的生物浓缩因子(BCF(SS))被计算为藻类小于 1,而大型蚤为 1.6 至 2.2。在假定的 24 至 48 小时内发生的鱼类 BCF(SS)被计算为两个测试浓度均小于 1。一个一阶单室(吸收阶段)和一个一阶双室(消除阶段)模型描述了斑马鱼的吸收和净化动力学(k(1)=0.027-0.038/h 和 k(2)=0.206-0.222/h,t(95)=13.5 至 14.6 小时,t(50)=3.1 至 3.3 小时,BCF(kinetic)=0.4 至 0.9)。本研究表明,三氯蔗糖不会在不同营养级的水生生物中生物积累,并且获得的 BCF 远低于确定持久性、生物累积性和毒性物质的标准(即 BCF≥2000)。