Suppr超能文献

验证简化急性生理学评分 3 评分系统在韩国重症监护病房中的应用。

Validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 scoring system in a Korean intensive care unit.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jan;52(1):59-64. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.59.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 was recently proposed to reflect contemporary changes in intensive care practices. SAPS 3 features customized equations for the prediction of mortality in different geographic regions. However, the usefulness of SAPS 3 and its customized equation (Australasia SAPS 3) have never been externally validated in Korea. This study was designed to validate SAPS 3 and Australasia SAPS 3 for mortality prediction in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the prospective intensive care unit (ICU) registry was conducted in the medical ICU of Samsung Medical Center. Calibration and discrimination were determined by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and area under the receiver operating characteristic (aROC) curve from 633 patients.

RESULTS

The mortalities (%) predicted by SAPS 3, Australasia SAPS 3, and SAPS II were 42 ± 28, 39 ± 27 and 37 ± 31, respectively. The calibration of SAPS II was poor (p = 0.003). SAPS 3 and Australasia SAPS 3 were appropriate (p > 0.05). The discriminative power of all models yielded aROC values less than 0.8.

CONCLUSION

In Korea, mortality rates predicted using general SAPS 3 and Australasia SAPS 3 exhibited good calibration and modest discrimination. However, Australasia SAPS 3 did not improve the mortality prediction. To better predict mortality in Korean ICUs, a new equation may be needed specifically for Korea.

摘要

目的

简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)3 最近被提出,以反映重症监护实践的当代变化。SAPS 3 具有针对不同地理区域死亡率预测的定制方程。然而,SAPS 3 及其定制方程(澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3)在韩国从未经过外部验证。本研究旨在验证 SAPS 3 和澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 在韩国的死亡率预测。

材料和方法

对三星医疗中心内科重症监护病房的前瞻性重症监护病房(ICU)登记进行回顾性分析。通过 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(aROC)曲线从 633 例患者中确定校准和判别能力。

结果

SAPS 3、澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 和 SAPS II 预测的死亡率(%)分别为 42±28、39±27 和 37±31。SAPS II 的校准效果不佳(p=0.003)。SAPS 3 和澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 是合适的(p>0.05)。所有模型的判别能力产生的 aROC 值均小于 0.8。

结论

在韩国,使用一般 SAPS 3 和澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 预测的死亡率表现出良好的校准和适度的判别能力。然而,澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 并没有提高死亡率预测。为了更好地预测韩国 ICU 的死亡率,可能需要为韩国专门开发一个新的方程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7c/3017709/f02962c7b942/ymj-52-59-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验