• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证简化急性生理学评分 3 评分系统在韩国重症监护病房中的应用。

Validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 scoring system in a Korean intensive care unit.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jan;52(1):59-64. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.59.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.59
PMID:21155036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3017709/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 was recently proposed to reflect contemporary changes in intensive care practices. SAPS 3 features customized equations for the prediction of mortality in different geographic regions. However, the usefulness of SAPS 3 and its customized equation (Australasia SAPS 3) have never been externally validated in Korea. This study was designed to validate SAPS 3 and Australasia SAPS 3 for mortality prediction in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the prospective intensive care unit (ICU) registry was conducted in the medical ICU of Samsung Medical Center. Calibration and discrimination were determined by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and area under the receiver operating characteristic (aROC) curve from 633 patients.

RESULTS

The mortalities (%) predicted by SAPS 3, Australasia SAPS 3, and SAPS II were 42 ± 28, 39 ± 27 and 37 ± 31, respectively. The calibration of SAPS II was poor (p = 0.003). SAPS 3 and Australasia SAPS 3 were appropriate (p > 0.05). The discriminative power of all models yielded aROC values less than 0.8.

CONCLUSION

In Korea, mortality rates predicted using general SAPS 3 and Australasia SAPS 3 exhibited good calibration and modest discrimination. However, Australasia SAPS 3 did not improve the mortality prediction. To better predict mortality in Korean ICUs, a new equation may be needed specifically for Korea.

摘要

目的

简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)3 最近被提出,以反映重症监护实践的当代变化。SAPS 3 具有针对不同地理区域死亡率预测的定制方程。然而,SAPS 3 及其定制方程(澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3)在韩国从未经过外部验证。本研究旨在验证 SAPS 3 和澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 在韩国的死亡率预测。

材料和方法

对三星医疗中心内科重症监护病房的前瞻性重症监护病房(ICU)登记进行回顾性分析。通过 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(aROC)曲线从 633 例患者中确定校准和判别能力。

结果

SAPS 3、澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 和 SAPS II 预测的死亡率(%)分别为 42±28、39±27 和 37±31。SAPS II 的校准效果不佳(p=0.003)。SAPS 3 和澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 是合适的(p>0.05)。所有模型的判别能力产生的 aROC 值均小于 0.8。

结论

在韩国,使用一般 SAPS 3 和澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 预测的死亡率表现出良好的校准和适度的判别能力。然而,澳大拉西亚 SAPS 3 并没有提高死亡率预测。为了更好地预测韩国 ICU 的死亡率,可能需要为韩国专门开发一个新的方程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7c/3017709/f02962c7b942/ymj-52-59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7c/3017709/f02962c7b942/ymj-52-59-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c7c/3017709/f02962c7b942/ymj-52-59-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 scoring system in a Korean intensive care unit.验证简化急性生理学评分 3 评分系统在韩国重症监护病房中的应用。
Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jan;52(1):59-64. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.59.
2
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
3
Validation of SAPS3 admission score and its customization for use in Korean intensive care unit patients: a prospective multicentre study.SAPS3 入院评分的验证及其在韩国重症监护病房患者中的定制应用:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Respirology. 2013 Aug;18(6):989-95. doi: 10.1111/resp.12115.
4
The performance and customization of SAPS 3 admission score in a Thai medical intensive care unit.泰国重症监护病房 SAPS 3 入院评分的表现和定制。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):342-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1629-7. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的六种死亡率预测模型的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):R116-22. doi: 10.1186/cc2373. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
6
Evaluation of intensive care unit performance in Lithuania using the SAPS II system.使用简化急性生理学评分系统(SAPS II)评估立陶宛重症监护病房的绩效。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Aug;21(8):619-24. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504008063.
7
Validation of the APACHE IV model and its comparison with the APACHE II, SAPS 3, and Korean SAPS 3 models for the prediction of hospital mortality in a Korean surgical intensive care unit.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统IV(APACHE IV)模型的验证及其与急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)和韩国简化急性生理学评分系统3(Korean SAPS 3)模型在韩国外科重症监护病房预测医院死亡率方面的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Aug;67(2):115-22. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.2.115. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
8
Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study.四项预后评分在巴西重症监护病房癌症患者中的验证:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1188-95. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1807-7. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
9
Evaluation of single intensive care unit performance by simplified acute physiology score II system.采用简化急性生理学评分II系统评估单个重症监护病房的绩效
Croat Med J. 2005 Dec;46(6):964-9.
10
Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.中国某医疗中心中,三种预后模型在需要重症监护的癌症患者中的表现。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0131329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131329. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of novel simple prognostic model for predicting mortality in Korean intensive care units using national insurance claims data.利用国家保险理赔数据开发和验证用于预测韩国重症监护病房死亡率的新型简单预后模型。
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(4):625-639. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.311. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
2
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
3
Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Austrian validation and customization of the SAPS 3 Admission Score.奥地利对SAPS 3入院评分的验证与定制
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr;35(4):616-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1286-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
2
SAPS 3 admission score: an external validation in a general intensive care population.简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)入院评分:普通重症监护人群中的外部验证
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1873-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1187-4. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
3
Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care.
中国某医疗中心中,三种预后模型在需要重症监护的癌症患者中的表现。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0131329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131329. eCollection 2015.
4
Performance of the SAPS 3 admission score as a predictor of ICU mortality in a Philippine private tertiary medical center intensive care unit.SAPS 3 入院评分在菲律宾私立三级医疗中心重症监护病房预测 ICU 死亡率的表现。
J Intensive Care. 2014 Apr 24;2(1):29. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-29. eCollection 2014.
5
Evaluation of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 performance: a systematic review of external validation studies.简化急性生理学评分3(SAPS 3)性能评估:外部验证研究的系统评价
Crit Care. 2014 Jun 6;18(3):R117. doi: 10.1186/cc13911.
6
Usefulness of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective observational study.N末端B型利钠肽原在重症监护病房患者中的应用价值:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Mar 10;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-16.
7
External validation of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II in Korean intensive care units.韩国重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ的外部验证。
Yonsei Med J. 2013 Mar 1;54(2):425-31. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.2.425.
8
Calibration strategies to validate predictive models: is new always better?验证预测模型的校准策略:新的就一定更好吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Aug;38(8):1246-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2579-z. Epub 2012 May 15.
SAPS 3入院预后模型在需要重症监护的癌症患者中的验证。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1839-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0374-4. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
4
Performance of standard severity scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit in North India.印度北部一家呼吸重症监护病房收治患者的标准严重程度评分系统对预后预测的性能。
Respirology. 2006 Mar;11(2):196-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00828.x.
5
SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description.简化急性生理学评分系统3——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第1部分:目标、方法和队列描述。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1336-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
6
SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission.简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第2部分:重症监护病房入院时医院死亡率预后模型的开发。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1345-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
7
Prognostic performance and customization of the SAPS II: results of a multicenter Austrian study. Simplified Acute Physiology Score.SAPS II的预后性能及定制:奥地利一项多中心研究的结果。简化急性生理学评分
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Feb;25(2):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s001340050815.
8
As American as apple pie and APACHE. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation.就像苹果派和APACHE一样具有美国特色。急性生理学与慢性健康评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1297-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00001.
9
Multicenter outcome study of cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a probability of mortality model.入住重症监护病房的癌症患者多中心结局研究:死亡率概率模型
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):761-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.761.
10
A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.基于一项欧洲/北美多中心研究的新型简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)。
JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957.