• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SAPS 3 入院评分在菲律宾私立三级医疗中心重症监护病房预测 ICU 死亡率的表现。

Performance of the SAPS 3 admission score as a predictor of ICU mortality in a Philippine private tertiary medical center intensive care unit.

机构信息

Section of Adult Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2014 Apr 24;2(1):29. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-29. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/2052-0492-2-29
PMID:25520841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4267583/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) as a predictor of ICU mortality in critically ill patients of different case mixes admitted to an intensive care unit.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed from January 2011 to August 2013 in the intensive care unit of a private tertiary referral center in the Philippines. Predicted ICU mortality was calculated using the SAPS 3 global model. Observed versus predicted mortality rates were compared, and the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated. The discrimination and calibration characteristics of the SAPS 3 system to predict ICU mortality were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 2,426 patients were included. The observed ICU mortality was 277 (11.42%). The SAPS 3 global model had fair to good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (CI 0.78-0.81). Good calibration was seen with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit at Ĉ = 11.51 (p = 0.175). Standardized mortality ratio was 0.36 (0.26-0.81).

CONCLUSION

The global SAPS 3 prediction model showed fair to good discrimination and good calibration in predicting mortality in our intensive care unit. Different levels of discrimination and calibration across the different subgroups analyzed suggest that overall ICU performance seemed to be affected by case mix variations.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估简化急性生理学评分 3 版(SAPS 3)作为预测不同病例组合的危重症患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率的指标的性能。

方法

本回顾性队列研究于 2011 年 1 月至 2013 年 8 月在菲律宾一家私立三级转诊中心的重症监护病房进行。使用 SAPS 3 全球模型计算 ICU 死亡率的预测值。比较观察死亡率与预测死亡率,并计算标准化死亡率比(SMR)。评估 SAPS 3 系统预测 ICU 死亡率的区分度和校准度特征。

结果

共纳入 2426 例患者。观察到的 ICU 死亡率为 277 例(11.42%)。SAPS 3 全球模型的区分度为中等至良好,接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.80(CI 0.78-0.81)。拟合优度的 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验良好, Ĉ 值为 11.51(p=0.175)。标准化死亡率比为 0.36(0.26-0.81)。

结论

SAPS 3 全球预测模型在预测我们重症监护病房的死亡率方面表现出中等至良好的区分度和良好的校准度。分析的不同亚组之间存在不同程度的区分度和校准度,这表明 ICU 的整体表现似乎受到病例组合变化的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/918b/4267583/b6f699b188c6/40560_2014_36_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/918b/4267583/b6f699b188c6/40560_2014_36_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/918b/4267583/b6f699b188c6/40560_2014_36_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of the SAPS 3 admission score as a predictor of ICU mortality in a Philippine private tertiary medical center intensive care unit.SAPS 3 入院评分在菲律宾私立三级医疗中心重症监护病房预测 ICU 死亡率的表现。
J Intensive Care. 2014 Apr 24;2(1):29. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-29. eCollection 2014.
2
The SAPS 3 score as a predictor of hospital mortality in a South African tertiary intensive care unit: A prospective cohort study.SAPS 3 评分对南非一家三级重症监护病房住院患者病死率的预测价值:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233317. eCollection 2020.
3
Performance in mortality prediction of SAPS 3 And MPM-III scores among adult patients admitted to the ICU of a private tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study.坦桑尼亚一家私立三级转诊医院重症监护病房成年患者中SAPS 3和MPM-III评分在死亡率预测中的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 16;9:e12332. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12332. eCollection 2021.
4
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
5
Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的六种死亡率预测模型的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):R116-22. doi: 10.1186/cc2373. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
6
Evaluation of intensive care unit performance in Lithuania using the SAPS II system.使用简化急性生理学评分系统(SAPS II)评估立陶宛重症监护病房的绩效。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Aug;21(8):619-24. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504008063.
7
The performance and customization of SAPS 3 admission score in a Thai medical intensive care unit.泰国重症监护病房 SAPS 3 入院评分的表现和定制。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):342-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1629-7. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
8
Performance of three prognostic models in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective study.三种预后模型在癌症重症患者中的表现:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1242-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01659-0. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
The predictive performance of the SAPS II and SAPS 3 scoring systems: A retrospective analysis.序贯器官衰竭评估Ⅱ(SAPS Ⅱ)和序贯器官衰竭评估3(SAPS 3)评分系统的预测性能:一项回顾性分析。
J Crit Care. 2016 Jun;33:180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.第三代严重程度评分系统(APACHE IV、SAPS 3 和 MPM-III)在急性肾损伤危重症患者中的表现。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Dec;26(12):3894-901. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr201. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of platelet-activating factors in severe sepsis by flow cytometry and its correlation with clinical sepsis scoring system: A pilot study.流式细胞术分析严重脓毒症患者血小板活化因子及其与临床脓毒症评分系统的相关性:一项初步研究
Med J Armed Forces India. 2019 Oct;75(4):429-436. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
2
Performance of critical care prognostic scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家重症监护预后评分系统的表现:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2018 Jan 26;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1930-8.
3
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.

本文引用的文献

1
Calibration belt for quality-of-care assessment based on dichotomous outcomes.基于二分类结局的医疗质量评估校准带。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016110.
2
Validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 scoring system in a Korean intensive care unit.验证简化急性生理学评分 3 评分系统在韩国重症监护病房中的应用。
Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jan;52(1):59-64. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.59.
3
Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.评估预测模型的性能:传统和新型指标的框架。
简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
4
Validation of a prognostic score for mortality in elderly patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房老年患者死亡率预后评分的验证
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;20(12):695-700. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.195702.
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2.
4
The performance and customization of SAPS 3 admission score in a Thai medical intensive care unit.泰国重症监护病房 SAPS 3 入院评分的表现和定制。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):342-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1629-7. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
Austrian validation and customization of the SAPS 3 Admission Score.奥地利对SAPS 3入院评分的验证与定制
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr;35(4):616-22. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1286-2. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
6
Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房中急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(SAPS II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统3(SAPS 3)、急性生理和慢性健康评价II(APACHE II)及其定制预后模型的性能比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Dec;101(6):798-803. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen291. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
7
SAPS 3 admission score: an external validation in a general intensive care population.简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)入院评分:普通重症监护人群中的外部验证
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1873-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1187-4. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
8
Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care.SAPS 3入院预后模型在需要重症监护的癌症患者中的验证。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1839-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0374-4. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
9
Performance of standard severity scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit in North India.印度北部一家呼吸重症监护病房收治患者的标准严重程度评分系统对预后预测的性能。
Respirology. 2006 Mar;11(2):196-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00828.x.
10
Evaluation of single intensive care unit performance by simplified acute physiology score II system.采用简化急性生理学评分II系统评估单个重症监护病房的绩效
Croat Med J. 2005 Dec;46(6):964-9.