Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, 111 South 11th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):422-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182042e56. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
Residents in anesthesia training programs throughout the world are required to document their clinical cases to help ensure that they receive adequate training. Current systems involve self-reporting, are subject to delayed updates and misreported data, and do not provide a practicable method of validation. Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) are being used increasingly in training programs and are a logical source for verifiable documentation. We hypothesized that case logs generated automatically from an AIMS would be sufficiently accurate to replace the current manual process. We based our analysis on the data reporting requirements of the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).
We conducted a systematic review of ACGME requirements and our AIMS record, and made modifications after identifying data element and attribution issues. We studied 2 methods (parsing of free text procedure descriptions and CPT4 procedure code mapping) to automatically determine ACGME case categories and generated AIMS-based case logs and compared these to assignments made by manual inspection of the anesthesia records. We also assessed under- and overreporting of cases entered manually by our residents into the ACGME website.
The parsing and mapping methods assigned cases to a majority of the ACGME categories with accuracies of 95% and 97%, respectively, as compared with determinations made by 2 residents and 1 attending who manually reviewed all procedure descriptions. Comparison of AIMS-based case logs with reports from the ACGME Resident Case Log System website showed that >50% of residents either underreported or overreported their total case counts by at least 5%.
The AIMS database is a source of contemporaneous documentation of resident experience that can be queried to generate valid, verifiable case logs. The extent of AIMS adoption by academic anesthesia departments should encourage accreditation organizations to support uploading of AIMS-based case log files to improve accuracy and to decrease the clerical burden on anesthesia residents.
世界各地的麻醉培训项目要求住院医师记录他们的临床病例,以确保他们接受了足够的培训。目前的系统涉及自我报告,存在更新延迟和数据报告错误的问题,并且无法提供可行的验证方法。麻醉信息管理系统(AIMS)在培训计划中越来越多地被使用,并且是可验证文档的合理来源。我们假设从 AIMS 自动生成的病例日志将足够准确,可以替代当前的手动流程。我们的分析基于美国研究生医学教育学院(ACGME)的报告要求。
我们对 ACGME 的要求和我们的 AIMS 记录进行了系统审查,并在确定数据元素和归属问题后进行了修改。我们研究了 2 种方法(解析自由文本手术描述和 CPT4 手术代码映射)来自动确定 ACGME 病例类别,并生成基于 AIMS 的病例日志,并将其与手动检查麻醉记录的分配进行比较。我们还评估了住院医师手动输入到 ACGME 网站的病例的少报和多报情况。
解析和映射方法将病例分配到大多数 ACGME 类别中,准确率分别为 95%和 97%,而 2 名住院医师和 1 名主治医生手动审查所有手术描述的准确率为 97%。与 ACGME 住院医师病例日志系统网站上的报告相比,>50%的住院医师少报或多报了他们的总病例数至少 5%。
AIMS 数据库是住院医师经验的同期文档来源,可以查询以生成有效、可验证的病例日志。学术麻醉部门对 AIMS 的采用程度应鼓励认证组织支持上传基于 AIMS 的病例日志文件,以提高准确性并减轻麻醉住院医师的文书负担。