• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Attributing Patients to Pediatric Residents Using Electronic Health Record Features Augmented with Audit Logs.利用电子健康记录特征和审核日志为儿科住院医师分配患者。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):442-451. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713133. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Where Is the Digitally Silent Provider? Development and Validation of a Team-Centered Electronic Health Record Attribution Model for Supervising Residents.数字化静默提供者在哪里?用于监督住院医师的以团队为中心的电子健康记录归因模型的开发和验证。
Acad Med. 2023 Jan 1;98(1):62-66. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004978. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
3
Tracking resident pre-rounding electronic health record usage.追踪住院医师预查房时电子健康记录的使用情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Apr 15;32(3):611-620. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2018-0137.
4
Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in the Pediatric ICU Using Audit-Logs and Screen Recordings.使用审核日志和屏幕记录测量儿科 ICU 中的电子健康记录使用情况。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):737-744. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733851. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Modeling Care Team Structures in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit through Network Analysis of EHR Audit Logs.通过电子健康记录审计日志的网络分析对新生儿重症监护病房的护理团队结构进行建模。
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Nov;58(4-05):109-123. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702237. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
6
Vascular surgery residents spend one fifth of their time on electronic health records after duty hours.血管外科住院医师在工作时间后,将五分之一的时间用于电子病历。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 May;69(5):1574-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.173.
7
Characterizing electronic health record usage patterns of inpatient medicine residents using event log data.使用事件日志数据刻画内科住院医师的电子健康记录使用模式。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0205379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205379. eCollection 2019.
8
Learning Tasks of Pediatric Providers from Electronic Health Record Audit Logs.儿科医务人员从电子健康记录审核日志中学习的任务。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:612-618. eCollection 2020.
9
Automatic Detection of Front-Line Clinician Hospital Shifts: A Novel Use of Electronic Health Record Timestamp Data.基于电子病历时间戳数据的一线临床医师班次自动检测:一种新的应用
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):28-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676819. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
10
Impact of implementing an electronic health record on surgical resident work flow, duty hours, and operative experience.实施电子健康记录对外科住院医师工作流程、值班时长及手术经验的影响。
Am Surg. 2015 Feb;81(2):172-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging Domains for Measuring Health Care Delivery With Electronic Health Record Metadata.利用电子健康记录元数据衡量医疗服务提供的新兴领域。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e64721. doi: 10.2196/64721.
2
An unclear partnership: key questions about physician and advanced practice provider collaboration in primary care.不明晰的合作关系:关于初级保健中医师与高级执业提供者协作的关键问题
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jan 17;3(2):qxaf006. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf006. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Digital supervision in the clinical learning environment: Characterizing teamwork in the electronic health record.临床学习环境中的数字监督:电子健康记录中的团队合作特征
J Hosp Med. 2025 Apr;20(4):352-359. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13529. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
4
A Model for Work Intensity in a Pediatric Training Program.儿科培训计划中的工作强度模型。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Dec;14(6):714-718. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00323.1.
5
Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures.利用事件日志观察与电子健康记录的交互:更新的范围综述显示,越来越多地使用供应商提供的指标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac177.
6
Characterizing intensive care unit rounding teams using meta-data from the electronic health record.利用电子健康记录中的元数据描述重症监护病房查房团队。
J Crit Care. 2022 Dec;72:154143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154143. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Design, Usability, and Acceptability of a Needs-Based, Automated Dashboard to Provide Individualized Patient-Care Data to Pediatric Residents.基于需求的、自动化仪表板的设计、可用性和可接受性,为儿科住院医师提供个性化患者护理数据。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):380-390. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744388. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
8
Use of clinical data to augment healthcare worker contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic.利用临床数据在 COVID-19 大流行期间补充医疗工作者的接触者追踪。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):142-148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab231.
9
Predicting next-day discharge via electronic health record access logs.通过电子健康记录访问日志预测次日出院。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2670-2680. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab211.
10
Resident Physician Experience and Duration of Electronic Health Record Use.住院医师的电子病历使用经验和时长。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):721-728. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732403. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
A Feasibility Study to Attribute Patients to Primary Interns on Inpatient Ward Teams Using Electronic Health Record Data.使用电子健康记录数据为住院病房团队中的初级住院医师分配患者的可行性研究。
Acad Med. 2019 Sep;94(9):1376-1383. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002748.
2
Using claims data to attribute patients with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer to prescribing oncologists.利用索赔数据将乳腺癌、肺癌或结直肠癌患者分配给开处方的肿瘤学家。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2019 Mar 29;10:15-22. doi: 10.2147/POR.S197252. eCollection 2019.
3
Using Electronic Health Record Data to Assess Residents' Clinical Performance in the Workplace: The Good, the Bad, and the Unthinkable.利用电子健康记录数据评估住院医师在工作场所的临床表现:有利有弊,还有不可想象的。
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):853-860. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002672.
4
Automatic Detection of Front-Line Clinician Hospital Shifts: A Novel Use of Electronic Health Record Timestamp Data.基于电子病历时间戳数据的一线临床医师班次自动检测:一种新的应用
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):28-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676819. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
5
Patient attribution: why the method matters.患者归因:方法为何重要。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Dec;24(12):596-603.
6
Developing Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures: Engaging Stakeholders to Inform Next Steps.制定以住院医师为敏感指标的质量测量工具:让利益相关者参与,以确定下一步工作。
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Mar;19(2):177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
7
An evaluation of clinical order patterns machine-learned from clinician cohorts stratified by patient mortality outcomes.基于患者死亡率分层的临床医师队列中机器学习得出的临床医嘱模式评估。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Oct;86:109-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Considering the interdependence of clinical performance: implications for assessment and entrustment.考虑临床能力的相互依存性:对评估和委托的影响。
Med Educ. 2018 Apr 19;52(9):970-80. doi: 10.1111/medu.13588.
9
Harnessing the Power of Big Data to Improve Graduate Medical Education: Big Idea or Bust?利用大数据提高医学研究生教育质量:大创意还是泡影?
Acad Med. 2018 Jun;93(6):833-834. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002209.
10
A Method for Attributing Patient-Level Metrics to Rotating Providers in an Inpatient Setting.在住院环境中为轮转医务人员分配患者水平指标的方法。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Jul 1;13(7):470-475. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2897. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

利用电子健康记录特征和审核日志为儿科住院医师分配患者。

Attributing Patients to Pediatric Residents Using Electronic Health Record Features Augmented with Audit Logs.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2020 May;11(3):442-451. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713133. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1713133
PMID:32583389
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7314655/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient attribution, or the process of attributing patient-level metrics to specific providers, attempts to capture real-life provider-patient interactions (PPI). Attribution holds wide-ranging importance, particularly for outcomes in graduate medical education, but remains a challenge. We developed and validated an algorithm using EHR data to identify pediatric resident PPIs (rPPIs).

METHODS

We prospectively surveyed residents in three care settings to collect self-reported rPPIs. Participants were surveyed at the end of primary care clinic, emergency department (ED), and inpatient shifts, shown a patient census list, asked to mark the patients with whom they interacted, and encouraged to provide a short rationale behind the marked interaction. We extracted routine EHR data elements, including audit logs, note contribution, order placement, care team assignment, and chart closure, and applied a logistic regression classifier to the data to predict rPPIs in each care setting. We also performed a comment analysis of the resident-reported rationales in the inpatient care setting to explore perceived patient interactions in a complicated workflow.

RESULTS

We surveyed 81 residents over 111 shifts and identified 579 patient interactions. Among EHR extracted data, time-in-chart was the best predictor in all three care settings (primary care clinic: odds ratio [OR] = 19.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.19-278.56; ED: OR = 19.06, 95% CI: 9.53-41.65' inpatient OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 2.23-3.97). Primary care clinic and ED specific models had statistic values > 0.98, while the inpatient-specific model had greater variability (statistic = 0.89). Of 366 inpatient rPPIs, residents provided rationales for 90.1%, which were focused on direct involvement in a patient's admission or transfer, or care as the front-line ordering clinician (55.6%).

CONCLUSION

Classification models based on routinely collected EHR data predict resident-defined rPPIs across care settings. While specific to pediatric residents in this study, the approach may be generalizable to other provider populations and scenarios in which accurate patient attribution is desirable.

摘要

目的

患者归因,即根据特定提供者分配患者水平指标的过程,旨在捕捉实际的医患互动(PPI)。归因具有广泛的重要性,特别是在住院医师医学教育的结果方面,但仍然具有挑战性。我们使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据开发并验证了一种算法,以识别儿科住院医师的 PPI(rPPI)。

方法

我们前瞻性地调查了三个护理环境中的住院医师,以收集自我报告的 rPPI。参与者在初级保健诊所、急诊部(ED)和住院病房结束时接受调查,展示患者普查名单,要求他们标记与他们互动的患者,并鼓励他们提供标记互动背后的简短理由。我们从常规 EHR 数据元素中提取数据,包括审核日志、笔记贡献、订单放置、护理团队分配和图表关闭,并将逻辑回归分类器应用于数据,以预测每个护理环境中的 rPPI。我们还对住院病房中住院医师报告的理由进行了评论分析,以探索在复杂工作流程中感知到的患者互动。

结果

我们调查了 111 个班次中的 81 名住院医师,并确定了 579 次患者互动。在提取的 EHR 数据中,在所有三个护理环境中,时间在图表中是最好的预测因素(初级保健诊所:优势比 [OR] = 19.36,95%置信区间 [CI]:4.19-278.56;ED:OR = 19.06,95% CI:9.53-41.65'住院 OR = 2.95,95% CI:2.23-3.97)。初级保健诊所和 ED 的特定模型具有大于 0.98 的统计值,而住院病房特定模型具有更大的可变性(统计值= 0.89)。在 366 例住院 rPPI 中,住院医师为 90.1%提供了理由,这些理由集中在直接参与患者的入院或转院,或作为一线下医嘱的临床医生进行护理(55.6%)。

结论

基于常规收集的 EHR 数据的分类模型可预测护理环境中的住院医师定义的 rPPI。虽然本研究针对儿科住院医师,但该方法可能适用于其他提供者群体和需要准确患者归因的情况。