• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术中股骨假体周围骨折——综述

Periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty - a review.

作者信息

Rayan Faizal, Haddad Fares

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2010 Oct-Dec;20(4):418-26. doi: 10.1177/112070001002000402.

DOI:10.1177/112070001002000402
PMID:21157744
Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are among the more difficult and expensive complications of total hip arthroplasty. A rise in the elderly population and increase use of primary hip replacement has led to an escalating incidence. They can occur intra operatively and post operatively. The treatment algorithm defined by the Vancouver classification has universal acceptance. The epidemiology, etiology, classification and the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty are reviewed.

摘要

人工关节周围股骨骨折(PFF)是全髋关节置换术中较难处理且费用较高的并发症之一。老年人口的增加以及初次髋关节置换手术使用的增多导致了其发病率不断上升。它们可发生在手术中及术后。由温哥华分类法定义的治疗方案已被广泛接受。本文对全髋关节置换术中人工关节周围股骨骨折的流行病学、病因、分类及治疗进行综述。

相似文献

1
Periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty - a review.全髋关节置换术中股骨假体周围骨折——综述
Hip Int. 2010 Oct-Dec;20(4):418-26. doi: 10.1177/112070001002000402.
2
Clinical characteristics and risk factors of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study.髋关节置换术后假体周围股骨骨折的临床特征及危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(35):e4751. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004751.
3
Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.髋关节置换术中单柄假体周围股骨骨折的发生率、分类及危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1400-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
Treatment and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures.温哥华 B 型假体周围股骨骨折的治疗和结果。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):293-300. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0935.R1.
5
[Traumatic periprosthetic fractures in patients with total hip replacement].[全髋关节置换患者的创伤性假体周围骨折]
Unfallchirurg. 2019 Nov;122(11):885-900. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-00727-z.
6
Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures.温哥华B2型人工关节周围股骨骨折的治疗。
Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):1989-93. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2959-4. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
7
Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.全髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的处理:综述
Int Orthop. 2015 Oct;39(10):2005-10. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2979-0. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
8
Periprosthetic femoral fractures--evaluation of risk factors.人工关节周围股骨骨折——危险因素评估
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012 Jul-Sep;116(3):846-52.
9
Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?人工关节周围股骨骨折及如何避免:股骨假体部件设计对人工关节周围股骨骨折风险增加有何影响?
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):50-59. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0220.R1.
10
Cumulative Long-Term Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using an Uncemented Tapered Titanium Hip Stem: 26- to 32-Year Results.使用非骨水泥锥形钛合金髋关节柄的累积长期术后股骨假体周围骨折发生率:26 至 32 年的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid Fixation Technique for Femoral Stem Revision in B3 Periprosthetic Fractures: A Report of Two Cases.B3型假体周围骨折中股骨柄翻修的混合固定技术:两例报告
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Feb 28;32:101645. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101645. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Multiplanar Semicircular New-Generation Implant System Developed for Proximal Femur Periprosthetic Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.为股骨近端假体周围骨折研发的多平面半圆形新一代植入系统:一项生物力学研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 14;61(1):110. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010110.
3
Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens.
人工关节周围股骨骨折的治疗算法
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022 May 10;13:21514593221097608. doi: 10.1177/21514593221097608. eCollection 2022.
4
Metallic versus Non-Metallic Cerclage Cables System in Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Treatment: Single-Institution Experience at a Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up.金属与非金属环扎线缆系统在髋关节置换周围骨折治疗中的应用:单机构至少1年随访经验
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 14;11(6):1608. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061608.
5
Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision.温哥华 B2 型假体周围骨折经内固定与翻修治疗的对比研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3589-3597. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03953-6. Epub 2021 May 16.
6
Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: a comparative in vitro study regarding primary stability and maximum fracture load.骨水泥型短柄的生物力学:一项关于初始稳定性和最大骨折负荷的体外对比研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Oct;141(10):1797-1806. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03843-x. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Factors affecting the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fractures following primary and revision hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.影响初次和翻修髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折发生率的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02152-0.
8
Conservative treatment using a sponge cast for transfer fractures in nursing home patients.使用海绵夹板对养老院患者的转移骨折进行保守治疗。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Jul 26;14:1361-1369. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S210310. eCollection 2019.
9
Osteosynthesis of bilateral Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture after a bilateral RM total hip arthroplasty at 24 and 21-years follow-up: A case report.双侧初次全髋关节置换术后24年和21年随访时双侧温哥华B2型假体周围股骨骨折的骨固定术:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;60:98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 11.
10
Early Definitive Fixation of an Open Periprosthetic Femur Fracture in the Polytraumatized Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.多发伤患者开放性人工关节周围股骨骨折的早期确定性固定:一例报告并文献复习
J Orthop Case Rep. 2016 Jan-Mar;6(1):33-6. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.371.