University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, 48106-1248, USA.
Addict Behav. 2011 Mar;36(3):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
The association between drinking motives and protective behavioral strategies was explored, including whether individuals with different drinking motives were more or less likely to utilize protective behavioral strategies and whether the combination of drinking motives and use of protective strategies may help identify individuals at elevated risk for alcohol-related problems. The final sample included 358 college students (59.2% female; M=18.47 years old, SD=.58). Individuals who had greater enhancement and social motives for drinking used protective strategies less frequently, controlling for number of drinks per week; those who had greater conformity motives used protective strategies more frequently. Coping motives were not significantly correlated with the mean of protective factors, but were associated with less frequently using individual strategies. Using protective strategies more frequently was associated with consuming fewer drinks and having lower RAPI scores. Interactions of drinking motives with the number of protective strategies tended to be non-significant; however, significant interactions indicated that greater coping and conformity motives were especially associated with negative outcomes among individuals who used fewer protective strategies.
探讨了饮酒动机与保护性行为策略之间的关系，包括具有不同饮酒动机的个体是否更倾向于使用保护性行为策略，以及饮酒动机与使用保护策略的组合是否有助于识别有更高风险的酒精相关问题的个体。最终样本包括 358 名大学生（59.2%为女性；M=18.47 岁，SD=.58）。控制每周饮酒量后，有更大的增强和社交饮酒动机的个体较少使用保护策略；有更大的从众饮酒动机的个体更频繁地使用保护策略。应对动机与保护因素的平均值没有显著相关性，但与较少使用个别策略相关。更频繁地使用保护策略与饮酒量较少和 RAPI 评分较低有关。饮酒动机与保护策略数量的相互作用往往不显著；然而，显著的相互作用表明，在使用较少保护策略的个体中，更大的应对和从众动机与负面结果特别相关。
