Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA.
J Adolesc. 2010 Oct;33(5):755-65. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
The links between motivations for alcohol use and for sexual behaviors are not well understood. Latent profile analysis was used to identify drinking motivational profiles (based on motivations for: fun/social, relaxation/coping, image, sex; motivations against: physical, behavioral) and sex motivational profiles (motivations for: enhancement, intimacy, coping; motivations against: not ready, health, values) among college students (N=227, 51% male). Latent profiles for drinking were: low for/high against drinking (34%), average drinking motives (53%), and high for/low against drinking (13%). Profiles for sex were: low for/high against sex (35%), high for/low against sex (42%), and high for with coping/moderate against sex (23%). Motivational profiles were related across behaviors. Drinking motivational profiles were associated with alcohol use and psychosocial adjustment; sex motivational profiles were associated with sexual experiences. Distinct profiles of motivations support the need for differentiated intervention programs targeting individuals with different patterns of reasons for engaging in risk behaviors during late adolescence.
饮酒动机与性行为动机之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究采用潜在剖面分析来确定大学生的饮酒动机（基于以下动机：娱乐/社交、放松/应对、形象、性；避免以下动机：身体、行为）和性动机（基于以下动机：增强、亲密、应对；避免以下动机：没准备好、健康、价值观）特征（N=227，男性占 51%）。饮酒的潜在特征为：低饮酒/高避免（34%）、平均饮酒动机（53%）和高饮酒/低避免（13%）。性的潜在特征为：低性/高避免（35%）、高性/低避免（42%）和高性与应对/适度避免（23%）。跨行为的动机特征相关。饮酒动机特征与饮酒和心理社会适应有关；性动机特征与性经历有关。不同的动机特征表明，在青少年后期，针对具有不同风险行为原因模式的个体，需要制定有区别的干预计划。
