• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌患者的比较:围手术期结果和长期生存比较。

Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

机构信息

Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):6-14. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd19d0.

DOI:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd19d0
PMID:21160307
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to assess the safety and oncologic feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted resection for rectal cancer vs open rectal resection as a phase II pilot study for a planned randomized control trial.

METHODS

A case-matched controlled prospective analysis of 54 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection for stage I to III (no T4) rectal cancer within 12 cm of the anal verge from 2002 to 2005 was performed. Patients were matched with contemporary patients who underwent open rectal cancer surgery (n = 108) in a 1 to 2 fashion. The perioperative clinical outcomes, postoperative pathology, and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The demographic data did not differ significantly between the groups. The laparoscopic group manifested early return of bowel function (P = .003). The complication rate was 22.2% in the laparoscopic group and 32.4% in the open group (P = .178). Local recurrence was similar (2.0% laparoscopic, 4.2% open, P = .417). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate also were similar (overall survival, 90.8% laparoscopic, 88.5% open, P = .261; disease-free survival, 80.8% laparoscopic, 75.8% open. P = .390).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic-assisted resection for rectal cancer was acceptable in terms of oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinical outcomes. The present data are the basis for a large-scale randomized trial for comparison of laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgeries (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z6051).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估腹腔镜辅助直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的安全性和肿瘤学可行性,作为计划进行的随机对照试验的 II 期试点研究。

方法

对 2002 年至 2005 年间接受腹腔镜辅助直肠切除术治疗 I 期至 III 期(无 T4)距肛门 12cm 以内直肠肿瘤的 54 例患者进行了病例匹配对照前瞻性分析。按照 1:2 的比例与同期接受开放式直肠癌手术的患者(n=108)进行匹配。比较两组患者的围手术期临床结局、术后病理和肿瘤学结局。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学数据无显著差异。腹腔镜组患者术后肠道功能恢复较早(P=0.003)。腹腔镜组的并发症发生率为 22.2%,开放组为 32.4%(P=0.178)。局部复发率相似(腹腔镜组 2.0%,开放组 4.2%,P=0.417)。5 年总生存率和无病生存率也相似(总生存率,腹腔镜组 90.8%,开放组 88.5%,P=0.261;无病生存率,腹腔镜组 80.8%,开放组 75.8%,P=0.390)。

结论

腹腔镜辅助直肠切除术在肿瘤学结果和围手术期临床结果方面是可以接受的。目前的数据为比较腹腔镜和开放直肠癌手术的大规模随机试验提供了依据(美国外科医师学院肿瘤学组 Z6051)。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌患者的比较:围手术期结果和长期生存比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):6-14. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd19d0.
2
Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的近期和远期疗效。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Aug;55(8):854-63. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825b9052.
3
Results of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma: retrospective analysis of 157 cases.直肠腺癌腹腔镜前切除术的结果:157例回顾性分析
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):233-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.020.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2418-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0. Epub 2008 Apr 5.
5
Laparoscopic resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜下直肠癌切除术
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 May;35(5):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
6
Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗中高位直肠癌前切除术:疗效评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0551-0.
7
Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal disease locations.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术:腹膜外与腹膜内疾病部位手术及肿瘤学结局的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jun;51(6):844-51. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9256-x. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
8
Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for advanced rectal cancer.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗晚期直肠癌的长期疗效
S Afr J Surg. 2011 Nov 30;49(4):186-9.
9
Oncologic outcomes after resection of rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus open approach.直肠癌切除术后的肿瘤学结果:腹腔镜与开放手术比较。
Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):599-603. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.006.
10
Comparison between the oncologic outcome of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for T1 and T2 rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma: matched case-control study.T1和T2期直肠乙状结肠及直肠癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术肿瘤学结局的比较:配对病例对照研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1094-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of one-stitch method of temporary ileostomy on the surgical outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a propensity score matching analysis.单缝合法临时回肠造口术对直肠癌患者腹腔镜低位前切除术后手术结局及并发症的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Mar 22;30(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02464-z.
2
Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.腹腔镜手术治疗局部复发性直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 13;28(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02977-5.
3
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
4
Laparoscopic training on virtual-reality simulators or live pigs-a randomized controlled trial.在虚拟现实模拟器或活猪上进行腹腔镜训练——一项随机对照试验。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jun 5;85(7):3491-3496. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000798. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Letter to the editor: Not inferior but rather superior long-term disease-free survival after laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for low and mid rectal cancer!致编辑的信:对于低位和中位直肠癌,腹腔镜与开放全直肠系膜切除术相比,无病生存期并非更低,而是更高!
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;37(3):723-724. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04087-2. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
6
Mid- and low-rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open treatment-short- and long-term results. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中低位直肠癌:腹腔镜与开腹治疗——短期和长期结果。随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jan;37(1):71-99. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04048-9. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Treatment Outcomes Between Open, Laparoscopic- and Robotic-Assisted Surgical Approaches for Rectal Cancer Treatment.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌的短期治疗效果比较评估
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):649-652. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01137-z. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Excluding the ischiorectal fossa irradiation during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by abdominoperineal resection decreases perineal complications in patients with lower rectal cancer.在新辅助放化疗后行腹会阴联合切除术中,排除调强放疗对坐骨直肠窝的照射可降低低位直肠癌患者的会阴并发症。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 5;14(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1338-5.
9
Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.开腹与微创直肠肿瘤切除术治疗直肠肿瘤的单中心队列研究:连续 237 例患者分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00642-3. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.机器人技术在结直肠手术中的作用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(Suppl 7):42-53. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp2.42.