Suppr超能文献

开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助手术治疗直肠癌的短期治疗效果比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Treatment Outcomes Between Open, Laparoscopic- and Robotic-Assisted Surgical Approaches for Rectal Cancer Treatment.

作者信息

Somashekhar S P, Deshpande Abhinav Y, Ashwin K R, Gangasani R, Kumar Rohit, Shetty Sushrut

机构信息

Depatment of Surgical Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bangalore, India.

Nagpur, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):649-652. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01137-z. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

Abstract

The open surgeries and more recently minimal invasive surgeries aided by laparoscopic or robotic approaches are employed for rectal cancer treatment procedures. The open approach is the most commonly opted technique, but recent studies have also shown that laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the standard of care. There are certain shortcomings of laparoscopic surgery such as long learning curve, inadequate counter traction, limited dexterity, lack of tactile feedback and limited two-dimensional visions. Robotic surgery also offers several benefits to overcome the drawbacks of laparoscopic procedures, such as providing better dexterity and a more stable visualization This study aims to analyse the surgical results in terms of completion of TME, short-term surgical outcomes and hospital stay in after open, laparoscopic- and robotic-assisted rectal resections respectively. A retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of patients operated for carcinoma rectum between January 2013 and August 2018 at Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal-Vattikuti Institute of Robotic Surgery, Bangalore, was analysed in this study. The surgical parameters like completion of total mesorectal excision; proximal, distal and circumferential resection margins; number of nodes retrieved; and total post operative hospital stay were analysed in the open, laparoscopic-assisted and robotic-assisted groups. A total of 100 patients were included in the study consisting of 25, 25 and 50 patients each in the open, laparoscopic and robotic arms respectively. In case the desired results were not obtained using the advanced technique the procedure was converted and open technique was adopted. The conversion rate to open procedure was 8% (2of 25) in the laparoscopic-assisted group and 2% (1/50) in the robotic-assisted group. The average post operative hospital stay was 7.4, 7.36 and 6 days in the open, laparoscopic- and robotic-assisted group ( = 0.01) respectively. Robotic rectal resections show a trend towards better surgical results in the form of improved circumferential resection margins, completeness of TME and lower conversion rates.

摘要

开放性手术以及最近借助腹腔镜或机器人技术的微创手术被用于直肠癌治疗过程。开放手术是最常选用的技术,但最近的研究也表明,腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(TME)已成为护理标准。腹腔镜手术存在某些缺点,如学习曲线长、对抗牵引不足、灵活性有限、缺乏触觉反馈以及二维视野受限。机器人手术也具有若干优势,可克服腹腔镜手术的缺点,比如提供更好的灵活性和更稳定的视野。本研究旨在分别分析开放性、腹腔镜辅助和机器人辅助直肠切除术后TME的完成情况、短期手术结果及住院时间等手术结果。本研究对2013年1月至2018年8月在班加罗尔马尼帕尔综合癌症中心、马尼帕尔 - 瓦蒂库蒂机器人手术研究所接受直肠癌手术患者的前瞻性维护数据库进行了回顾性分析。分析了开放性、腹腔镜辅助和机器人辅助组的手术参数,如全直肠系膜切除术的完成情况、近端、远端和环周切缘、获取的淋巴结数量以及术后总住院时间。该研究共纳入100例患者,开放性、腹腔镜和机器人组分别有25例、25例和50例患者。如果使用先进技术未获得预期结果,则转换手术方式并采用开放技术。腹腔镜辅助组转为开放手术的比例为8%(25例中的2例),机器人辅助组为2%(50例中的1例)。开放性、腹腔镜辅助和机器人辅助组的平均术后住院时间分别为7.4天、7.36天和6天(P = 0.01)。机器人直肠切除术在环周切缘改善、TME完整性提高和转换率降低方面显示出手术结果更好的趋势。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Operative technique in robotic rectal resection.机器人直肠切除术的手术技术
Minerva Chir. 2019 Dec;74(6):501-508. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07808-2. Epub 2018 May 25.
7
Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.机器人技术在结肠和直肠手术中的应用。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Mar;26(1):39-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333660.
8
Robotic surgery: colon and rectum.机器人手术:结肠和直肠。
Cancer J. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):140-6. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31828ba0fd.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验