Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2011 Jun;42(3):270-90. doi: 10.1007/s10578-010-0214-1.
The authors examined parent–child interactions among three groups: selectively mute, anxious, and non-anxious children in different contexts. The relation between parental control (granting autonomy and high power remarks), child factors (i.e., age, anxiety, verbal participation), and parent anxiety was investigated. Parental control varied by context but parents of children with SM were more controlling than parents in the comparison groups in all contexts. Regression analyses indicated that child and parent anxiety predicted parental control, with increased anxiety associated with increased control. Older child age predicted less parent control. Group categorization moderated the relation between age and high power remarks, such that age was not a significant predictor for children with SM. Finally child-initiated speaking predicted high power remarks over and above other variables. These results support previous theories that parents take over for their children when they fail to meet performance demands, especially when the child or parent is anxious.
作者在不同情境下,对选择性缄默、焦虑和不焦虑三组儿童的亲子互动进行了研究。研究考察了父母控制(给予自主权和发表高控言论)、儿童因素(年龄、焦虑、言语参与)和父母焦虑之间的关系。父母控制因情境而异,但在所有情境中,SM 儿童的父母比对照组的父母控制程度更高。回归分析表明,儿童和父母的焦虑预测了父母的控制程度,焦虑程度越高,控制程度越高。年长的儿童年龄预示着父母的控制程度较低。组分类别调节了年龄与高控言论之间的关系,即年龄对于 SM 儿童来说不是一个重要的预测因素。最后,儿童发起的说话预测了高控言论,超过了其他变量。这些结果支持了之前的理论,即当孩子未能满足表现要求时,父母会代替他们,尤其是当孩子或父母焦虑时。