• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑肿瘤患者对欺骗的看法:一项定性研究。

Brain tumor patients' views on deception: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, 4 West Wing, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2011 Aug;104(1):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0498-9. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11060-010-0498-9
PMID:21161564
Abstract

Given the trust the public places in the medical profession, the question of when it might be acceptable to minimally deceive patients, in their best interests, is a challenging one to answer. In this study, we explore neuro-oncology patients' attitudes towards dilemmas in which they may feel deceived, and with that information make recommendations on what steps physicians can take to avoid breaking that trust. Qualitative case study methodology was used. Thirty-two face-to-face interviews with post-operative brain tumor patients were conducted and recorded. Interviews were transcribed and subjected to modified thematic analysis. The majority of patients had a postsecondary education, and there was substantial religious and ethnic diversity among them. Five prominent themes arose from the analysis: (1) patients are hesitant about trainees working on their case, but they are more open to it if they expect the occurrence ahead of time; (2) patients wish to know the exact details when an error has occurred, even if it is of inconsequential effect for them; (3) patients generally prefer to know exactly what the doctor knows, even if nothing can be changed; (4) patients expect physicians to provide them with all the options and resources available; and (5) there are special cases in which patients accept a delay in knowing. Most neuro-oncology patients trust their physicians to make the best decisions for them, but that does not mean they would accept subtle forms of deception. Patients prefer to have all the information necessary in order to make their own decision.

摘要

鉴于公众对医疗行业的信任,在何种情况下为了患者的最佳利益而可以进行最低限度的欺骗是一个具有挑战性的问题。在这项研究中,我们探讨了神经肿瘤患者对可能感到被欺骗的困境的态度,并根据这些信息就医生可以采取哪些措施来避免破坏这种信任提出建议。采用定性案例研究方法。对 32 名接受过脑部肿瘤手术后的患者进行了面对面访谈并记录。对访谈进行了转录,并进行了修改后的主题分析。大多数患者都接受过高等教育,他们在宗教和种族方面存在很大的多样性。分析得出了五个突出的主题:(1)患者对实习生参与他们的病例持犹豫态度,但如果他们事先预料到这种情况,他们会更加开放;(2)患者希望在发生错误时了解确切的细节,即使这对他们没有影响;(3)患者通常希望确切地了解医生所知道的,即使什么都无法改变;(4)患者希望医生向他们提供所有可用的选择和资源;(5)存在特殊情况,患者可以接受延迟了解。大多数神经肿瘤患者信任他们的医生为他们做出最佳决策,但这并不意味着他们会接受微妙形式的欺骗。患者希望拥有做出自己决定所需的所有信息。

相似文献

1
Brain tumor patients' views on deception: a qualitative study.脑肿瘤患者对欺骗的看法:一项定性研究。
J Neurooncol. 2011 Aug;104(1):331-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0498-9. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
2
A qualitative study of attitudes toward error in patients facing brain tumour surgery.一项关于脑肿瘤手术患者对错误态度的定性研究。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2004 May;31(2):208-12. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100053841.
3
Neurosurgery patients' feelings about the role of residents in their care: a qualitative case study.神经外科患者对住院医师在其护理中所起作用的看法:一项定性案例研究。
J Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;108(2):287-91. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/2/0287.
4
Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems.医生对于使用欺骗手段解决棘手伦理问题的态度。
JAMA. 1989 May 26;261(20):2980-5.
5
Patients' perception of error during craniotomy for brain tumour and their attitudes towards pre-operative discussion of error: a qualitative study.脑肿瘤开颅手术患者对术中失误的认知及其对术前失误讨论的态度:一项定性研究
Br J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;26(3):326-30. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.633642. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
6
Patient attitudes about the clinical use of placebo: qualitative perspectives from a telephone survey.患者对安慰剂临床应用的态度:电话调查的定性观点
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e011012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-011012.
7
Disclosures of illness by doctors to their patients: a qualitative study of doctors with HIV and other serious disorders.医生向患者披露病情:对感染艾滋病毒和患有其他严重疾病的医生的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):277-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
8
Deception and Drug Acquisition: Correlates of "Success" Among Drug-Seeking Patients.欺骗与药物获取:寻求药物治疗的患者中“成功”的相关因素
J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Jul;7(3):175-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131916628462. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Considering the case for an antidepressant drug trial involving temporary deception: a qualitative enquiry of potential participants.关于一项涉及临时欺骗的抗抑郁药物试验的案例探讨:对潜在参与者的定性调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 30;7:64. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-64.
10
A qualitative study to understand guideline-discordant use of imaging to stage incident prostate cancer.一项旨在了解对初发前列腺癌进行分期时影像检查指南不相符使用情况的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 2;11(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0484-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Informational needs of brain metastases patients and their caregivers.脑转移瘤患者及其照料者的信息需求。
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Jan;6(1):47-60. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy008. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
2
Informational and Supportive Care Needs of Brain Metastases Patients and Caregivers: a Systematic Review.脑转移患者及照料者的信息与支持性护理需求:一项系统综述
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Dec;32(4):914-923. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1030-5.
3
Lay attitudes toward deception in medicine: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.公众对医学领域欺骗行为的态度:理论思考与实证证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic privilege: between the ethics of lying and the practice of truth.治疗特权:在说谎的伦理和真相的实践之间。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Jun;36(6):353-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033340.
2
Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients: tackling three tough cases.向患者披露有害医疗差错:处理三个棘手案例。
Chest. 2009 Sep;136(3):897-903. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0030.
3
Kant and therapeutic privilege.
J Med Philos. 2008 Aug;33(4):321-36. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhn018.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2016 Jan 2;7(1):31-38. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1021494. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
4
Neurosurgery patients' feelings about the role of residents in their care: a qualitative case study.神经外科患者对住院医师在其护理中所起作用的看法:一项定性案例研究。
J Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;108(2):287-91. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/2/0287.
5
The end of therapeutic privilege?治疗特权的终结?
J Clin Ethics. 2006 Winter;17(4):312-6.
6
Reporting and disclosing medical errors: pediatricians' attitudes and behaviors.报告与披露医疗差错:儿科医生的态度与行为
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Feb;161(2):179-85. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.2.179.
7
Choosing your words carefully: how physicians would disclose harmful medical errors to patients.谨慎措辞:医生如何向患者披露有害医疗差错
Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(15):1585-93. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.15.1585.
8
Speaking your patients' language. A Massachusetts health system bridges linguistic and cultural gaps.用患者的语言交流。马萨诸塞州的一个医疗系统消除了语言和文化障碍。
Healthc Exec. 2005 Jul-Aug;20(4):36-7.
9
Truth-telling in clinical practice and the arguments for and against: a review of the literature.临床实践中的告知真相以及支持与反对的论据:文献综述
Nurs Ethics. 2004 Sep;11(5):500-13. doi: 10.1191/0969733004ne728oa.
10
A qualitative study of attitudes toward error in patients facing brain tumour surgery.一项关于脑肿瘤手术患者对错误态度的定性研究。
Can J Neurol Sci. 2004 May;31(2):208-12. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100053841.