WHR Architects, Inc., Houston, TX 77002, USA.
HERD. 2009 Winter;2(2):73-87. doi: 10.1177/193758670900200207.
This paper explores the history of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in comparison to the relatively short history of evidence-based design (EBD). Throughout its development, EBM has encountered a number of challenges, including dealing with initial objections to the concept, creating safeguards to ensure rigor in research, supporting practitioners in their efforts to stay current with a growing body of research data, applying the literature to real-life situations, making decisions when literature to inform decision making is absent, and educating students and professionals to become EBM practitioners. The ways in which the field of EBM has handled these challenges provides a number of lessons for the relatively young field of EBD.
本文探讨了循证医学（EBM）的历史，并将其与相对较短的循证设计（EBD）历史进行了比较。在其发展过程中，EBM 遇到了许多挑战，包括应对最初对该概念的反对意见、建立保障措施以确保研究的严谨性、支持从业人员努力跟上不断增长的研究数据、将文献应用于实际情况、在缺乏文献指导决策时做出决策，以及教育学生和专业人员成为 EBM 从业者。EBM 领域处理这些挑战的方式为相对年轻的 EBD 领域提供了许多经验教训。
