Maj M
Institute of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, First Medical School, University of Naples, Italy.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1990;13 Suppl 1:S66-70. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199001001-00007.
The response to lithium prophylaxis was evaluated in a sample of bipolar patients subdivided into groups, according to the previous pattern of course for their illness: MDI (sequence mania-depression-free interval), DMI (sequence depression-mania-free interval), CC-LC (continuous circular course with long cycles), CC-RC (continuous circular course with rapid cycles), IRR (irregular course). The percentage of responders to treatment was significantly different among the five groups, and the difference could be ascribed mainly to the high response rate in the MDI group and the low response rate in the DMI and CC-RC groups. These data suggest that the classification of bipolar patients on the basis of the previous pattern of their course of illness may be useful for predicting lithium response.
MDI(躁狂-抑郁-无发作间期模式)、DMI(抑郁-躁狂-无发作间期模式)、CC-LC(长周期连续循环病程)、CC-RC(短周期连续循环病程)、IRR(不规则病程),并在该样本中评估锂盐预防性治疗的反应。五组患者中治疗反应者的百分比存在显著差异,且该差异主要归因于MDI组的高反应率以及DMI组和CC-RC组的低反应率。这些数据表明,根据双相情感障碍患者既往疾病病程模式进行分类可能有助于预测锂盐治疗反应。