Acheson Daniel J, Macdonald Maryellen C
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States.
J Mem Lang. 2009 Apr 1;60(3):329-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.002..
Many accounts of working memory posit specialized storage mechanisms for the maintenance of serial order. We explore an alternative, that maintenance is achieved through temporary activation in the language production architecture. Four experiments examined the extent to which the phonological similarity effect can be explained as a sublexical speech error. Phonologically similar nonword stimuli were ordered to create tongue twister or control materials used in four tasks: reading aloud, immediate spoken recall, immediate typed recall, and serial recognition. Dependent measures from working memory (recall accuracy) and language production (speech errors) fields were used. Even though lists were identical except for item order, robust effects of tongue twisters were observed. Speech error analyses showed that errors were better described as phoneme rather than item ordering errors. The distribution of speech errors was comparable across all experiments and exhibited syllable-position effects, suggesting an important role for production processes. Implications for working memory and language production are discussed.
许多关于工作记忆的描述都假定存在专门的存储机制来维持序列顺序。我们探索了另一种观点,即维持是通过语言生成架构中的临时激活来实现的。四项实验考察了语音相似性效应在多大程度上可以被解释为一种次词汇言语错误。将语音相似的非词刺激进行排序,以创建用于四项任务的绕口令或对照材料:大声朗读、即时口语回忆、即时打字回忆和序列识别。使用了来自工作记忆(回忆准确性)和语言生成(言语错误)领域的相关测量指标。尽管除了项目顺序外列表是相同的,但仍观察到了绕口令的强烈效应。言语错误分析表明,错误更适合被描述为音素错误而非项目排序错误。所有实验中言语错误的分布具有可比性,并表现出音节位置效应,这表明生成过程起到了重要作用。我们讨论了对工作记忆和语言生成的影响。