Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar;37(3):385-93. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2096-x. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
To develop internationally harmonised standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine (ICM).
Standards were developed by using consensus techniques. A nine-member nominal group of European intensive care experts developed a preliminary set of standards. These were revised and refined through a modified Delphi process involving 28 European national coordinators representing national training organisations using a combination of moderated discussion meetings, email, and a Web-based tool for determining the level of agreement with each proposed standard, and whether the standard could be achieved in the respondent's country.
The nominal group developed an initial set of 52 possible standards which underwent four iterations to achieve maximal consensus. All national coordinators approved a final set of 29 standards in four domains: training centres, training programmes, selection of trainees, and trainers' profiles. Only three standards were considered immediately achievable by all countries, demonstrating a willingness to aspire to quality rather than merely setting a minimum level. Nine proposed standards which did not achieve full consensus were identified as potential candidates for future review.
This preliminary set of clearly defined and agreed standards provides a transparent framework for assuring the quality of training programmes, and a foundation for international harmonisation and quality improvement of training in ICM.
为重症监护医学(ICM)培训计划制定国际协调标准。
使用共识技术制定标准。一个由 9 名欧洲重症监护专家组成的名义小组制定了一套初步标准。通过涉及 28 名代表国家培训组织的欧洲国家协调员的改良 Delphi 过程对这些标准进行了修订和完善,该过程结合了有主持人的讨论会议、电子邮件以及基于 Web 的工具,以确定对每个拟议标准的共识程度以及该标准在答复国是否可行。
名义小组制定了最初的 52 个可能的标准,经过四轮迭代达到了最大共识。所有国家协调员都批准了四个领域的 29 个标准:培训中心、培训计划、学员选拔和培训师概况。只有三个标准被所有国家认为是立即可以实现的,这表明了对质量的渴望,而不仅仅是设定最低水平。有九个未达成完全共识的拟议标准被确定为未来审查的潜在候选标准。
这组初步明确界定和商定的标准为确保培训计划的质量提供了一个透明的框架,并为重症监护培训的国际协调和质量改进奠定了基础。