Bion J F, Barrett H
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Sep;32(9):1371-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0215-5. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
The aim of this study was to define the core (minimum) competencies required of a specialist in adult intensive care medicine (ICM). This is the second phase of a 3-year project to develop an internationally acceptable competency-based training programme in ICM for Europe (CoBaTrICE).
Consensus techniques (modified Delphi and nominal group) were used to enable interested stakeholders (health care professionals, educators, patients and their relatives) to identify and prioritise core competencies. Online and postal surveys were used to generate ideas. A nominal group of 12 clinicians met in plenary session to rate the importance of the competence statements constructed from these suggestions. All materials were presented online for a second round Delphi prior to iterative editorial review.
The initial surveys generated over 5,250 suggestions for competencies from 57 countries. Preliminary editing permitted us to encapsulate these suggestions within 164 competence stems and 5 behavioural themes. For each of these items the nominal group selected the minimum level of expertise required of a safe practitioner at the end of their specialist training, before rating them for importance. Individuals and groups from 29 countries commented on the nominal group output; this informed the editorial review. These combined processes resulted in 102 competence statements, divided into 12 domains.
Using consensus techniques we have generated core competencies which are internationally applicable but still able to accommodate local requirements. This provides the foundation upon which an international competency based training programme for intensive care medicine can be built.
本研究旨在确定成人重症医学(ICM)专科医生所需的核心(最低)能力。这是一个为期三年的项目的第二阶段,该项目旨在为欧洲开发一个国际认可的基于能力的ICM培训项目(CoBaTrICE)。
采用共识技术(改良德尔菲法和名义群体法),使相关利益者(医疗保健专业人员、教育工作者、患者及其亲属)能够识别核心能力并确定其优先级。通过在线和邮寄调查收集意见。一个由12名临床医生组成的名义群体召开全体会议,对根据这些建议构建的能力陈述的重要性进行评分。在进行迭代编辑审核之前,所有材料都在网上进行第二轮德尔菲调查。
初步调查从57个国家收集了超过5250条关于能力的建议。初步编辑使我们能够将这些建议归纳为164个能力主干和5个行为主题。对于每个项目,名义群体选择了专科培训结束时安全从业者所需的最低专业水平,然后对其重要性进行评分。来自29个国家的个人和团体对名义群体的结果发表了评论;这为编辑审核提供了参考。这些综合过程产生了102条能力陈述,分为12个领域。
通过共识技术,我们生成了具有国际适用性但仍能适应当地需求的核心能力。这为建立一个基于国际能力的重症医学培训项目奠定了基础。