Easley M W
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Detroit, School of Dentistry.
Public Health Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;105(4):348-53.
Community water fluoridation has served the American public extremely well as the cornerstone of dental caries prevention activities for 45 years. The dental and general health benefits associated with the ingestion of water-borne fluorides have been well known by researchers for an even longer period. Continued research has repeatedly confirmed the safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of community water fluoridation in preventing dental caries for Americans regardless of age, race, ethnicity, religion, educational status, or socioeconomic level. Despite the obvious benefits associated with this proven public health measure, slow progress has been made toward achieving the 1990 national fluoridation objectives as listed in "Promoting Health/Preventing Disease: Objectives for the Nation." This paper documents the lagging pace of community fluoridation by reviewing and analyzing data reported in "Fluoridation Census, 1985," a document published in late 1988 by the Public Health Service's Centers for Disease Control. Failure to attain the 1990 objectives is attributable to a combination of circumstances, including their low priority within many local, State, and Federal health agencies, inadequate funding at all levels of government, lack of a coordinated and focused national fluoridation effort, failure of most States to require fluoridation, lack of Federal legislation mandating fluoridation, general apathy of most health professional organizations toward fluoridation, misconceptions by the public about effectiveness and safety and, finally, unrelenting opposition by a highly vocal minority of the lay public. In addition, fluoridation successes have not been consistent among States, with wide variation in accomplishments documented in the reported data.While fluoridation still is one of the most cost effective public health measures available to local,State, and Federal public health agencies, it remains significantly underused nearly a half century after its discovery. Without a major increase in emphasis at the highest policy levels within local, State, and Federal health agencies, fluoridation objectives currently proposed for inclusion in the year 2000 national health objectives are not likely to be achieved. More private sector involvement and better coordination of efforts among all levels of government will be necessary to make significant improvements in progress toward universal fluoridation of all public water supplies in the United States.
45年来,社区水氟化作为预防龋齿活动的基石,为美国公众提供了极大的帮助。研究人员早就知道摄入水中氟化物对牙齿和整体健康有益。持续的研究反复证实,社区水氟化对预防美国人龋齿具有安全性、有效性和高效性,无论其年龄、种族、民族、宗教、教育程度或社会经济水平如何。尽管这项经过验证的公共卫生措施带来了明显益处,但在实现《促进健康/预防疾病:国家目标》中列出的1990年全国水氟化目标方面进展缓慢。本文通过回顾和分析美国公共卫生服务中心疾病控制中心1988年末发布的《1985年水氟化普查》报告中的数据,记录了社区水氟化的滞后步伐。未能实现1990年目标归因于多种情况,包括在许多地方、州和联邦卫生机构中其优先级较低,各级政府资金不足,缺乏协调一致且重点突出的全国水氟化工作,大多数州未要求实行水氟化,缺乏强制实行水氟化的联邦立法,大多数卫生专业组织对水氟化普遍冷漠,公众对其有效性和安全性存在误解,以及最后一小部分公众的强烈反对。此外,各州水氟化的成功情况并不一致,报告数据记录的成就差异很大。虽然水氟化仍然是地方、州和联邦公共卫生机构可用的最具成本效益的公共卫生措施之一,但自发现以来近半个世纪,它仍未得到充分利用。如果地方、州和联邦卫生机构最高政策层面不大力加强重视,目前提议纳入2000年国家卫生目标的水氟化目标不太可能实现。需要更多私营部门的参与以及各级政府更好地协调努力,才能在美国朝着所有公共供水全面实行水氟化取得重大进展。