• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拒绝为孩子提供预防保健的照顾者:免疫接种与局部氟化物拒绝之间的关系。

Caregivers who refuse preventive care for their children: the relationship between immunization and topical fluoride refusal.

机构信息

Donald L. Chi is with the Department of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):1327-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301927. Epub 2014 May 15.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.301927
PMID:24832428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4056200/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine caregivers' refusal of preventive medical and dental care for children.

METHODS

Prevalence rates of topical fluoride refusal based on dental records and caregiver self-reports were estimated for children treated in 3 dental clinics in Washington State. A 60-item survey was administered to 1024 caregivers to evaluate the association between immunization and topical fluoride refusal. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate prevalence rate ratios (PRRs).

RESULTS

The prevalence of topical fluoride refusal was 4.9% according to dental records and 12.7% according to caregiver self-reports. The rate of immunization refusal was 27.4%. In the regression models, immunization refusal was significantly associated with topical fluoride refusal (dental record PRR = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32, 1.96; P < .001; caregiver self-report PRR = 6.20; 95% CI = 3.21, 11.98; P < .001). Caregivers younger than 35 years were significantly more likely than older caregivers to refuse both immunizations and topical fluoride (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver refusal of immunizations is associated with topical fluoride refusal. Future research should identify the behavioral and social factors related to caregiver refusal of preventive care with the goal of developing multidisciplinary strategies to help caregivers make optimal preventive care decisions for children.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨照顾者拒绝为儿童提供预防医学和牙科保健的原因。

方法

根据华盛顿州 3 家牙科诊所的牙科记录和照顾者的自我报告,估计了儿童拒绝局部用氟化物治疗的流行率。对 1024 名照顾者进行了一项 60 项的问卷调查,以评估免疫接种和局部用氟化物拒绝之间的关系。采用修正泊松回归模型来估计流行率比(PRR)。

结果

根据牙科记录,拒绝局部用氟化物的比例为 4.9%,而根据照顾者的自我报告,这一比例为 12.7%。免疫接种拒绝率为 27.4%。在回归模型中,免疫接种拒绝与局部用氟化物拒绝显著相关(牙科记录 PRR = 1.61;95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.32,1.96;P <.001;照顾者自我报告 PRR = 6.20;95% CI = 3.21,11.98;P <.001)。年龄小于 35 岁的照顾者比年龄较大的照顾者更有可能同时拒绝免疫接种和局部用氟化物(P <.05)。

结论

照顾者拒绝免疫接种与拒绝局部用氟化物有关。未来的研究应确定与照顾者拒绝预防保健相关的行为和社会因素,以期制定多学科策略,帮助照顾者为儿童做出最佳预防保健决策。

相似文献

1
Caregivers who refuse preventive care for their children: the relationship between immunization and topical fluoride refusal.拒绝为孩子提供预防保健的照顾者:免疫接种与局部氟化物拒绝之间的关系。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):1327-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301927. Epub 2014 May 15.
2
Surveying Dentists' Perceptions of Caregiver Refusal of Topical Fluoride.调查牙医对护理人员拒绝使用局部用氟化物的看法。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018 Jul;3(3):314-320. doi: 10.1177/2380084418761846. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
3
Examining the association between untreated caries in children and parent fluoride treatment refusal.检查儿童未治疗龋齿与家长拒绝使用氟化物治疗之间的关联。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2024 Sep;155(9):774-780. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
A Mixed-Methods Study on Topical Fluoride Beliefs and Refusal Behaviors for Caregivers of Children with Special Health Care Needs.一项针对有特殊医疗需求儿童照顾者的局部用氟化物信念和拒绝行为的混合方法研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Jan;28(1):104-115. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03806-1. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
5
Association between caregiver opposition to topical fluoride and COVID-19 vaccines.看护者反对局部用氟化物与 COVID-19 疫苗之间的关联。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 27;41(5):1035-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.018. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Parent Refusal of Topical Fluoride for Their Children: Clinical Strategies and Future Research Priorities to Improve Evidence-Based Pediatric Dental Practice.家长拒绝为其子女使用局部用氟化物:改善循证儿科牙科实践的临床策略及未来研究重点
Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;61(3):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Understanding topical fluoride hesitancy and refusal behaviors through the extended parallel process model and health belief model.通过扩展平行过程模型和健康信念模型理解局部用氟化物的犹豫和拒绝行为。
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12512. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
A conceptual model on caregivers' hesitancy of topical fluoride for their children.关于照顾者对儿童局部用氟化物的犹豫的概念模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282834. eCollection 2023.
9
Do informal caregivers of demented patients refuse clinic comprehensive medico-psycho-social assessment? Prevalence and reasons for refusal.
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2018 Sep 1;16(3):247-254. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2018.0739.
10
Caregivers' understanding of fluoride varnish: implications for future clinical strategies and research on preventive care decision making.照顾者对氟化物涂料的理解:对未来临床策略和预防性护理决策研究的影响。
J Public Health Dent. 2018 Sep;78(4):282-286. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12277. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Fluoride Varnish Delivery in Primary Care: Insights from a Workflow and Cost Analysis.在初级保健中整合氟化物涂漆的应用:工作流程和成本分析的见解
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Sep-Oct;25(7):102865. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2025.102865. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
2
Topical fluoride hesitancy and opposition are significantly and positively associated: A cross-sectional study.局部用氟的迟疑态度与反对态度呈显著正相关:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0322027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322027. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comparison Between Parents with Different Attitudes Towards Topical Fluoride Application for Their Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.对孩子局部用氟持不同态度的家长之间的比较:一项横断面研究。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2025 Jan 9;23:27-34. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1804.
4
A cross-sectional study of physicians on fluoride-related beliefs and practices, and experiences with fluoride-hesitant caregivers.氟化物相关信念与实践的医师横断面研究,以及与氟化物抵触照护者相关的经验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0307085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307085. eCollection 2024.
5
Psychometric properties of the Fluoride Hesitancy Identification Tool (FHIT).氟化物犹豫识别工具(FHIT)的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0297188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297188. eCollection 2024.
6
A Mixed-Methods Study on Topical Fluoride Beliefs and Refusal Behaviors for Caregivers of Children with Special Health Care Needs.一项针对有特殊医疗需求儿童照顾者的局部用氟化物信念和拒绝行为的混合方法研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Jan;28(1):104-115. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03806-1. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
7
A Qualitative Study on Dentists' Communication Approaches in Managing Fluoride-Hesitant Caregivers.氟化物抵触型家长的管理中牙医沟通方式的定性研究
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Jul;9(3):212-220. doi: 10.1177/23800844231203673. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
A conceptual model on caregivers' hesitancy of topical fluoride for their children.关于照顾者对儿童局部用氟化物的犹豫的概念模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282834. eCollection 2023.
9
Topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers: Development of a content-valid topical fluoride hesitancy identification item pool.照顾者对局部用氟化物的犹豫:局部用氟化物犹豫识别项目库的内容效度发展。
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):116-122. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12558. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
10
Association between caregiver opposition to topical fluoride and COVID-19 vaccines.看护者反对局部用氟化物与 COVID-19 疫苗之间的关联。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 27;41(5):1035-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.018. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of nursery school-aged children who refuse fluoride varnish administration in a community setting: a Childsmile investigation.社区环境中拒绝接受氟化物涂漆治疗的学龄前儿童的预测:一项儿童微笑调查。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014 Jul;24(4):245-51. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12068. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
2
The architecture of provider-parent vaccine discussions at health supervision visits.卫生监督访视中提供者-家长疫苗讨论的架构。
Pediatrics. 2013 Dec;132(6):1037-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2037. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
3
Impact of varicella vaccination on varicella-related hospitalizations among American Indian/Alaska Native people.水痘疫苗对美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民中与水痘相关住院率的影响。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Mar;33(3):276-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000100.
4
Nonmedical vaccine exemptions and pertussis in California, 2010.2010 年加利福尼亚州非医学疫苗豁免与百日咳。
Pediatrics. 2013 Oct;132(4):624-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0878. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
5
Provider dismissal of vaccine-hesitant families: misguided policy that fails to benefit children.医疗服务提供者拒绝为犹豫不决的疫苗接种家庭提供服务:这项政策有误,无益于儿童健康。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Dec;9(12):2661-2. doi: 10.4161/hv.26284. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
6
A mixed methods study of parental vaccine decision making and parent-provider trust.父母疫苗决策和家长-提供者信任的混合方法研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct;13(5):481-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.05.030.
7
Parents who refuse to vaccinate their infants: paediatricians' feelings and treatment intentions.拒绝为婴儿接种疫苗的父母:儿科医生的感受及治疗意图。
Acta Paediatr. 2013 Dec;102(12):1186-91. doi: 10.1111/apa.12397. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
8
Religious exemptions for immunization and risk of pertussis in New York State, 2000-2011.宗教豁免与 2000-2011 年纽约州百日咳风险。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jul;132(1):37-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3449. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Global burden of oral conditions in 1990-2010: a systematic analysis.全球 1990-2010 年口腔状况负担:系统分析。
J Dent Res. 2013 Jul;92(7):592-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513490168. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Rice fortification: its potential for improving micronutrient intake and steps required for implementation at scale.大米强化:其在改善微量营养素摄入方面的潜力以及大规模实施所需的步骤。
Food Nutr Bull. 2012 Dec;33(4 Suppl):S360-72. doi: 10.1177/15648265120334S312.