Keller H, Riesen W F
Institut für Klinische Chemie und Hämatologie, Kantons St. Gallen, Schweiz.
Z Med Lab Diagn. 1990;31(4):200-10.
We compared the analytical performance of a new in house developed ELISA and the commercial TurbiTime system for the determination of Apo AI and Apo B. Six dilutions of a poolserum, whose concentration had been determined by two other independent methods, were used as test material. A serum from which the apolipoproteins had been removed by immunadsorption was used as a diluent. Six specimens with known true values of Apo AI and Apo B were thus prepared. We established the analytical precision, the regression function and the correlation with respect to the true values and we constructed precision profiles and bias profiles. We found that the precision of turbidimetry is superior for the determination of Apo AI with concentrations less than 1 g/l. With Apo B both systems are nearly equivalent, the results of the turbidimetric methods were a little too low, the results of the ELISA a little too high. Below a concentration less than 0.5 g/l both methods are unreliable.
我们比较了新开发的内部酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法与商用比浊法TurbiTime系统在测定载脂蛋白AI(Apo AI)和载脂蛋白B(Apo B)方面的分析性能。使用六种稀释度的混合血清作为测试材料,该混合血清的浓度已通过其他两种独立方法测定。用通过免疫吸附去除了载脂蛋白的血清作为稀释剂。由此制备了六个载脂蛋白AI和载脂蛋白B具有已知真实值的样本。我们确定了分析精密度、回归函数以及与真实值的相关性,并构建了精密度曲线和偏差曲线。我们发现,对于浓度低于1 g/l的Apo AI测定,比浊法的精密度更高。对于Apo B,两种系统几乎相当,比浊法的结果略低,ELISA法的结果略高。在浓度低于0.5 g/l时,两种方法都不可靠。