Rosenqvist E, Wedege E, Høiby E A, Frøholm L O
Department of Methodology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
APMIS. 1990 Jun;98(6):501-6.
Two new methods for serogrouping of meningococci, whole-cell ELISA and dot-blotting, with monoclonal antibodies against serogroups A, B, C, Y and W135 were compared with slide-agglutination applying polyclonal sera. In addition to a panel of strains with previously determined serogroups by slide-agglutination, two strain collections of meningococci were studied: 1) 50 strains isolated from patients with systemic meningococcal disease in Norway during the winter 1987-1988; 2) 133 throat strains isolated from asymptomatic carriers over the same period. For the disease strains all three methods gave identical results, whereas some carrier strains which were non-agglutinable or polyagglutinable by slide-agglutination were serogroupable by the two other methods. All the systemic strains and about half of the carrier strains were serogroupable. We find that whole-cell ELISA and dot-blotting are specific, easy to read and more sensitive compared to slide-agglutination, but the former methods are at present limited by the availability of monoclonal antibodies against only serogroups A, B, C, Y and W135.
将针对A、B、C、Y和W135血清群的单克隆抗体用于脑膜炎球菌血清分组的两种新方法,即全细胞酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和斑点印迹法,与应用多克隆血清的玻片凝集法进行了比较。除了一组先前已通过玻片凝集法确定血清群的菌株外,还研究了两组脑膜炎球菌菌株:1)1987 - 1988年冬季从挪威患有全身性脑膜炎球菌病的患者中分离出的50株菌株;2)同期从无症状携带者中分离出的133株咽喉菌株。对于患病菌株,所有三种方法得出的结果相同,而一些通过玻片凝集法不可凝集或多凝集的携带者菌株可通过其他两种方法进行血清分组。所有全身性菌株和约一半的携带者菌株都可进行血清分组。我们发现,与玻片凝集法相比,全细胞ELISA和斑点印迹法具有特异性、易于判读且更灵敏,但目前前两种方法受到仅针对A、B、C、Y和W135血清群的单克隆抗体可用性的限制。