Suppr超能文献

通过协同凝集、斑点印迹法和酶联免疫吸附测定对脑膜炎奈瑟菌分离株进行血清分型和亚型分型。

Serotyping and subtyping of Neisseria meningitidis isolates by co-agglutination, dot-blotting and ELISA.

作者信息

Wedege E, Høiby E A, Rosenqvist E, Frøholm L O

机构信息

Department of Methodology, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo 4, Norway.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 1990 Mar;31(3):195-201. doi: 10.1099/00222615-31-3-195.

Abstract

Typing of meningococci with a panel of serotype and subtype specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was compared in co-agglutination, dot-blotting and ELISA tests. Twenty reference strains, 50 case isolates and 133 throat isolates from healthy carriers were studied. The typing results with dot-blotting and ELISA were identical, whereas co-agglutination gave different results for three case and 24 carrier strains. The distribution of serotypes and subtypes among the strains is reported. The combination of the subtypes P1.1 and P1.15 in a serotype 15 patient strain was observed. With one case strain and 15 carrier strains, neither serotype nor subtype could be determined. Non-typable and non-subtypable isolates were further characterised by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Co-agglutination is useful for typing small numbers of strains with a few MAbs, but less suitable for large-scale typing than the other two methods. Dot-blotting needs less expensive equipment, smaller volumes of antibodies and fewer manipulations than ELISA.

摘要

使用一组血清型和亚型特异性单克隆抗体(MAbs)对脑膜炎球菌进行分型,并在协同凝集、斑点印迹和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试验中进行比较。研究了20株参考菌株、50株病例分离株和133株来自健康携带者的咽喉分离株。斑点印迹和ELISA的分型结果相同,而协同凝集对3株病例菌株和24株携带者菌株给出了不同结果。报告了菌株中血清型和亚型的分布情况。在15型患者菌株中观察到亚型P1.1和P1.15的组合。对于1株病例菌株和15株携带者菌株,血清型和亚型均无法确定。通过十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳对不可分型和不可分亚型的分离株进行了进一步鉴定。协同凝集适用于用少量MAbs对少量菌株进行分型,但与其他两种方法相比,不太适合大规模分型。斑点印迹所需设备成本较低,抗体用量较少,操作比ELISA少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验