Kasapoglu Fikret, Kaya Fatma Nur, Tuzemen Gokhan, Ozmen Omer Afsin, Kaya Atila, Onart Selcuk
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Uludag University, Nilufer, 16059 Bursa, Turkey.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;75(3):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.015. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
To compare the effects of preincisional peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on post-tonsillectomy pain in children.
Sixty children undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated into three groups before tonsillectomy: peritonsillar infiltrations with 0.25% levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group levobupivacaine, n=20), 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group bupivacaine, n=20), and normal saline (group saline, n=20) were applied. Pain was evaluated by using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Choice of additional analgesic was acetaminophen for all patients.
mCHEOPS values at 0th (immediately) and 30th minute after arrival the PACU were lower in both the local anesthetics groups than the saline group (p<0.001, p<0.01 for the group levobupivacaine; p<0.001, p<0.05 for the group bupivacaine, respectively). In addition, mCHEOPS values at 1st hour in the ward was lower in the group bupivacaine when compared to the group saline (p<0.05). Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia required, were also significantly different between the local anesthetic and saline groups (p<0.05 for both local anesthetics groups). Time to first mobilization was shorter in both local anesthetic groups when compared to the saline group (p<0.05 for both local anesthetic groups).
Preincisional peritonsillar infiltration with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine before tonsillectomy, are effective than saline, in reducing early post-tonsillectomy pain, where as bupivacaine had slightly longer effect. Compared to saline, with both anesthetic infiltrations, lesser medication for analgesia is required. The clinical trial registration number (Research Ethics Committee of Medical Faculty, Uludag University): 2008-4/36, 19 February 2008.
比较左旋布比卡因和布比卡因切皮前扁桃体周围浸润对儿童扁桃体切除术后疼痛的影响。
60例行择期扁桃体切除术或腺样体扁桃体切除术的儿童在扁桃体切除术前被随机分为三组:扁桃体周围浸润0.25%左旋布比卡因加1:200,000肾上腺素(左旋布比卡因组,n = 20)、0.25%布比卡因加1:200,000肾上腺素(布比卡因组,n = 20)和生理盐水(生理盐水组,n = 20)。采用改良的安大略东部儿童医院疼痛量表(mCHEOPS)评估疼痛。所有患者额外选择的镇痛药均为对乙酰氨基酚。
到达麻醉后恢复室(PACU)时第0分钟(即刻)和第30分钟,两个局部麻醉剂组的mCHEOPS值均低于生理盐水组(左旋布比卡因组:p < 0.001,p < 0.01;布比卡因组:p < 0.001,p < 0.05)。此外,与生理盐水组相比,布比卡因组在病房第1小时的mCHEOPS值更低(p < 0.05)。局部麻醉剂组和生理盐水组之间的镇痛需求和首次镇痛所需时间也有显著差异(两个局部麻醉剂组均为p < 0.05)。与生理盐水组相比,两个局部麻醉剂组首次活动的时间更短(两个局部麻醉剂组均为p < 0.05)。
扁桃体切除术前用左旋布比卡因或布比卡因进行切皮前扁桃体周围浸润,在减轻扁桃体切除术后早期疼痛方面比生理盐水更有效,其中布比卡因的作用时间略长。与生理盐水相比,两种麻醉剂浸润均需要更少的镇痛药物。临床试验注册号(于勒代格大学医学院研究伦理委员会):2008 - 4/36,2008年2月19日。