Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房念珠菌血流感染:重症监护病房研究中感染的广泛流行分析。

Candida bloodstream infections in intensive care units: analysis of the extended prevalence of infection in intensive care unit study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The University of Miami Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):665-70. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206c1ca.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To provide a global, up-to-date picture of the prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of Candida bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients and compare Candida with bacterial bloodstream infection.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of the Extended Prevalence of Infection in the ICU Study (EPIC II). Demographic, physiological, infection-related and therapeutic data were collected. Patients were grouped as having Candida, Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and combined Candida/bacterial bloodstream infection. Outcome data were assessed at intensive care unit and hospital discharge.

SETTING

EPIC II included 1265 intensive care units in 76 countries.

PATIENTS

Patients in participating intensive care units on study day.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 14,414 patients in EPIC II, 99 patients had Candida bloodstream infections for a prevalence of 6.9 per 1000 patients. Sixty-one patients had candidemia alone and 38 patients had combined bloodstream infections. Candida albicans (n = 70) was the predominant species. Primary therapy included monotherapy with fluconazole (n = 39), caspofungin (n = 16), and a polyene-based product (n = 12). Combination therapy was infrequently used (n = 10). Compared with patients with Gram-positive (n = 420) and Gram-negative (n = 264) bloodstream infections, patients with candidemia were more likely to have solid tumors (p < .05) and appeared to have been in an intensive care unit longer (14 days [range, 5-25 days], 8 days [range, 3-20 days], and 10 days [range, 2-23 days], respectively), but this difference was not statistically significant. Severity of illness and organ dysfunction scores were similar between groups. Patients with Candida bloodstream infections, compared with patients with Gram-positive and Gram-negative bloodstream infections, had the greatest crude intensive care unit mortality rates (42.6%, 25.3%, and 29.1%, respectively) and longer intensive care unit lengths of stay (median [interquartile range]) (33 days [18-44], 20 days [9-43], and 21 days [8-46], respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Candidemia remains a significant problem in intensive care units patients. In the EPIC II population, Candida albicans was the most common organism and fluconazole remained the predominant antifungal agent used. Candida bloodstream infections are associated with high intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates and resource use.

摘要

目的

提供重症监护病房患者中念珠菌血流感染的流行率、治疗和结局的全球最新情况,并将念珠菌与细菌血流感染进行比较。

设计

对扩展重症监护病房感染流行率研究(EPIC II)进行回顾性分析。收集了人口统计学、生理学、感染相关和治疗数据。将患者分为念珠菌、革兰阳性菌、革兰阴性菌和念珠菌/细菌混合血流感染。在重症监护病房和出院时评估结局数据。

地点

EPIC II 纳入了 76 个国家的 1265 个重症监护病房。

患者

研究日参加重症监护病房的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

在 EPIC II 的 14414 名患者中,99 名患者发生念珠菌血流感染,患病率为每 1000 名患者 6.9 例。61 名患者单纯患有念珠菌血症,38 名患者患有混合血流感染。白色念珠菌(n=70)是主要的菌种。主要治疗方法包括氟康唑(n=39)、卡泊芬净(n=16)和多烯类产品(n=12)的单药治疗。联合治疗很少使用(n=10)。与革兰阳性菌(n=420)和革兰阴性菌(n=264)血流感染患者相比,念珠菌血症患者更有可能患有实体肿瘤(p<0.05),并且似乎在重症监护病房停留的时间更长(14 天[范围,5-25 天]、8 天[范围,3-20 天]和 10 天[范围,2-23 天]),但差异无统计学意义。各组的疾病严重程度和器官功能评分相似。与革兰阳性和革兰阴性血流感染患者相比,念珠菌血流感染患者的重症监护病房死亡率(分别为 42.6%、25.3%和 29.1%)和重症监护病房住院时间(中位数[四分位间距])(分别为 33 天[18-44]、20 天[9-43]和 21 天[8-46])更高;然而,这些差异无统计学意义。

结论

念珠菌血症仍然是重症监护病房患者的一个严重问题。在 EPIC II 人群中,白色念珠菌是最常见的病原体,氟康唑仍然是主要使用的抗真菌药物。念珠菌血流感染与高重症监护病房和医院死亡率以及资源利用有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验