Department of Applied Dental Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan.
Br Dent J. 2010 Dec 18;209(12):607-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.1134.
The responsibility of ensuring impressions have been cleaned and disinfected before dispatch to the dental laboratory lies solely with the dentist. Uncertainty of impression disinfection risks both the health of the receiving dental technician and potential repeat disinfection of an already disinfected impression with detrimental consequences for its dimensions.
To ascertain, from the perspectives of dentists and dental technicians, current impression decontamination and disinfection practices with, in the case of the technicians, an estimate of the relative prevalence of contaminated voids within apparently disinfected impressions.
Anonymous postal questionnaire.
Dentist (n = 200) and dental technician (n = 200) potential participants, selected at random from the registers held by the General Dental Council, were invited to complete an anonymous postal questionnaire that sought to establish current practices and perceived effectiveness of impression disinfection.
Questionnaire return rates of 42.1% and 31.2% were recorded for dentists and dental technicians respectively. A wide range of solutions, at different dilutions of the same product, was used by the dentists to disinfect dental impressions. 37.2% rinsed the impressions with water, and 2.6% always brushed debris away, before disinfection. 24.7% of dentists did not inform the laboratory of disinfection. Irrespective of the disinfection status of the received impressions, 50% of the responding dental technicians disinfected all impressions. 95% of them had received blood-contaminated impressions. 15% had encountered blood-filled voids upon trimming back the peripheries of impressions. 64.7% were confident that the impressions received by them had been disinfected by the dentists.
Compliance with good practice is less than ideal and education in impression disinfection for both dentists and dental technicians is required to address this.
确保印模在发送到牙科实验室之前已清洗和消毒的责任完全由牙医承担。印模消毒情况不确定,既会对接收牙科技工的健康造成风险,也可能导致已消毒的印模被重复消毒,从而对其尺寸产生不利影响。
从牙医和牙科技术人员的角度确定当前印模的消毒和清洁情况,并且在技术人员方面,评估看似已消毒的印模中污染空隙的相对发生率。
匿名邮寄问卷。
从英国牙科协会注册记录中随机选择了 200 名牙医和 200 名牙科技术人员作为潜在参与者,邀请他们填写匿名邮寄问卷,旨在确定当前的印模消毒实践和感知的消毒效果。
牙医和牙科技术人员的问卷回收率分别为 42.1%和 31.2%。牙医使用了各种不同稀释度的相同产品来消毒牙科印模。37.2%的牙医用清水冲洗印模,2.6%的牙医在消毒前总是刷去碎屑。24.7%的牙医未将消毒情况告知实验室。无论收到的印模消毒情况如何,50%的牙科技术人员都会对所有印模进行消毒。他们中有 95%的人收到过受血液污染的印模。在修整印模周边时,有 15%的人遇到过充满血液的空隙。64.7%的牙科技术人员有信心认为他们收到的印模已被牙医消毒。
遵守良好实践的情况并不理想,需要对牙医和牙科技术人员进行印模消毒教育。