Rocca Corinne H, Krishnan Suneeta, Barrett Geraldine, Wilson Mark
Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, 101 Haviland Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-7358, USA.; Women's Global Health Imperative (WGHI), RTI International, 114 Sansome Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.
Demogr Res. 2010 Aug 6;23:293-334. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.11.
We evaluated the psychometric properties of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among Indian women using classical methods and Item Response Modeling. The scale exhibited good internal consistency and internal structure, with overall scores correlating well with each item's response categories. Items performed similarly for pregnant and non-pregnant women, and scores decreased with increasing parity, providing evidence for validity. Analyses also detected limitations, including infrequent selection of middle response categories and some evidence of differential item functioning by parity. We conclude that the LMUP represents an improvement over existing measures but recommend steps for enhancing scale performance for this cultural context.
我们使用经典方法和项目反应模型评估了印度女性的伦敦意外怀孕测量量表的心理测量特性。该量表表现出良好的内部一致性和内部结构,总体得分与每个项目的反应类别相关性良好。怀孕和未怀孕女性的项目表现相似,并且得分随着产次增加而降低,这为效度提供了证据。分析还发现了一些局限性,包括中间反应类别的选择频率较低以及一些产次导致的项目功能差异的证据。我们得出结论,伦敦意外怀孕测量量表相较于现有测量方法有所改进,但建议采取措施以提高该量表在这种文化背景下的性能。