Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0281, USA.
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011 Feb;96(2):492-506. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32987. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
The goal of this review is to introduce the biomaterials community to the emerging field of self-healing materials, and also to suggest how one could utilize and modify self-healing approaches to develop new classes of biomaterials. A brief discussion of the in vivo mechanical loading and resultant failures experienced by biomedical implants is followed by presentation of the self-healing methods for combating mechanical failure. If conventional composite materials that retard failure may be considered zeroth generation self-healing materials, then taxonomically speaking, first generation self-healing materials describe approaches that "halt" and "fill" damage, whereas second generation self-healing materials strive to "fully restore" the prefailed material structure. In spite of limited commercial use to date, primarily because the technical details have not been suitably optimized, it is likely from a practical standpoint that first generation approaches will be the first to be employed commercially, whereas second generation approaches may take longer to implement. For self-healing biomaterials the optimization of technical considerations is further compounded by the additional constraints of toxicity and biocompatibility, necessitating inclusion of separate discussions of design criteria for self-healing biomaterials.
本文的目的是向生物材料界介绍新兴的自修复材料领域,并提出如何利用和改进自修复方法来开发新的生物材料。简要讨论了生物医学植入物在体内受到的机械负载和由此产生的失效,然后介绍了用于对抗机械失效的自修复方法。如果将延缓失效的传统复合材料视为第一代自修复材料,那么从分类学的角度来看,第一代自修复材料描述了“停止”和“填充”损伤的方法,而第二代自修复材料则努力“完全恢复”失效前的材料结构。尽管迄今为止,自修复材料的商业应用有限,主要是因为技术细节尚未得到适当优化,但从实际角度来看,第一代方法很可能会首先被商业化采用,而第二代方法可能需要更长的时间才能实施。对于自修复生物材料,技术考虑因素的优化还因毒性和生物相容性的额外限制而变得更加复杂,因此需要单独讨论自修复生物材料的设计标准。