Cardiology Department, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010 Dec 21;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-61.
We aimed to evaluate the changes over time in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rate of hypertension in intervention and reference areas of a comprehensive community trial with reference area.
Data from independent sample surveys before and after implementation of the program (2001 vs.2007) were used to compare differences in the intervention and references areas over time. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg in non-diabetic patients and ≥130/80 mmHg in diabetic individuals and or taking antihypertensive medications. Interventional activities included educational strategies at population level as well as for hypertensive patients, their families and health professionals.
The study population of the baseline survey included 6175 (48.7% males) in the interventional area and 6339 (51.3% male) in the reference area. The corresponding figures in the post-intervention phase was 4717 (49.3% male) in the interventional area and 4853 (50.7% male) individuals in the reference area. The prevalence of hypertension had a non-significant decrease from 20.5%to 19.6%, in the interventional area whereas in the reference area, it increased from 17.4% to 19.6% (P = 0.003). If we consider Bp ≥ 140/90 in diabetic and non-diabetic patients as hypertension definition, the prevalence of hypertension in the interventional areas had a non-significant decrease from 18.9% in 2001 to 17.8% in 2007, whereas in the reference area, it had a significant rise from 15.7% to 17.9% (P = 0.002) respectively. Awareness, treatment and control rates of hypertension had better improvement in urban and rural part of the interventional area compared to reference area. The awareness, treatment, and control rates of hypertension increased significantly in the age groups of more than 40 years, as well as in all groups of body mass index in interventional areas without significant change in the reference area. Mean systolic blood pressure of study population in the interventional area decreased from 116.13 ±19.37 to 112.92 ± 18.27 mmHg (P < 0.001) without significant change in reference area.
This comprehensive and integrated program of interventions was effective in tackling with the prevalence of hypertension, and may improve the awareness, treatment and control rates of this disorder in a developing country setting.
我们旨在评估一个综合社区试验的干预和参照地区的高血压患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率随时间的变化,该试验有参照地区。
使用实施项目前后(2001 年与 2007 年)的独立样本调查数据,比较干预和参照地区随时间的差异。高血压定义为非糖尿病患者血压≥140/90mmHg 和糖尿病患者血压≥130/80mmHg,或正在服用降压药物。干预活动包括人群层面以及高血压患者、他们的家庭和卫生专业人员的教育策略。
基线调查的研究人群包括干预区的 6175 人(48.7%为男性)和参照区的 6339 人(51.3%为男性)。干预后阶段的相应数字为干预区的 4717 人(49.3%为男性)和参照区的 4853 人(50.7%为男性)。高血压患病率在干预区从 20.5%降至 19.6%,无显著变化,而在参照区则从 17.4%增至 19.6%(P=0.003)。如果我们将糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的血压≥140/90mmHg 定义为高血压,那么干预区的高血压患病率从 2001 年的 18.9%降至 2007 年的 17.8%,无显著变化,而参照区则从 15.7%显著上升至 17.9%(P=0.002)。干预区城乡地区高血压的知晓率、治疗率和控制率均有较好改善,而参照区则无明显变化。干预区 40 岁以上各年龄段以及所有体重指数组的高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率均显著提高,而参照区则无明显变化。干预区研究人群的平均收缩压从 116.13±19.37mmHg 降至 112.92±18.27mmHg(P<0.001),而参照区则无显著变化。
在发展中国家,这种综合和综合干预方案在处理高血压患病率方面是有效的,并可能提高该疾病的知晓率、治疗率和控制率。