• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院内儿童心脏骤停时除颤能量剂量的影响。

Effect of defibrillation energy dose during in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):e16-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1617. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2010-1617
PMID:21172997
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of initial defibrillation attempts. We hypothesized that (1) an initial shock dose of 2 ± 10 J/kg would be less effective for terminating fibrillation than suggested in published historical data and (2) a 4 J/kg shock dose would be more effective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation prospective, multisite, observational study of in-hospital pediatric (aged ≤18 years) ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia cardiac arrests from 2000-2008. Termination of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia and event survival after initial shocks of 2 J/kg were compared with historic controls and a 4 J/kg shock dose.

RESULTS

Of 266 children with 285 events, 173 of 285 (61%) survived the event and 61 of 266 (23%) survived to discharge. Termination of fibrillation after initial shock was achieved for 152 of 285 (53%) events. Termination of fibrillation with 2 ± 10 J/kg was much less frequent than that seen among historic control subjects (56% vs 91%; P < .001), but not different than 4 J/kg. Compared with 2 J/kg, an initial shock dose of 4 J/kg was associated with lower rates of return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio: 0.41 [95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.81]) and event survival (odds ratio: 0.42 [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

The currently recommended 2 J/kg initial shock dose for in-hospital cardiac arrest was substantially less effective than previously published. A higher initial shock dose (4 J/kg) was not associated with superior termination of ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia or improved survival rates. The optimal pediatric defibrillation dose remains unknown.

摘要

目的

研究初始除颤尝试的效果。我们假设:(1) 初始电击剂量为 2 ± 10 J/kg 比已发表的历史数据中建议的剂量更难终止纤颤;(2) 4 J/kg 的电击剂量会更有效。

患者和方法

这是一项全国心肺复苏注册处前瞻性、多地点、观察性研究,纳入 2000-2008 年期间院内发生的小儿(年龄≤18 岁)心室纤颤或无脉性室性心动过速心脏骤停患者。将 2 J/kg 初始电击剂量后的室颤或无脉性室速终止情况与历史对照和 4 J/kg 电击剂量进行比较。

结果

在 266 例儿童的 285 次事件中,173 例(61%)在事件中存活,266 例(23%)存活至出院。285 次事件中,有 152 次(53%)初始电击后终止纤颤。2 ± 10 J/kg 时的纤颤终止率明显低于历史对照(56% vs 91%;P <.001),但与 4 J/kg 相似。与 2 J/kg 相比,4 J/kg 的初始电击剂量与自主循环恢复率(比值比:0.41 [95%置信区间:0.21-0.81])和事件存活率(比值比:0.42 [95%置信区间:0.18-0.98])降低相关。

结论

目前推荐的院内心脏骤停初始 2 J/kg 电击剂量明显不如以往发表的剂量有效。较高的初始电击剂量(4 J/kg)与终止室颤或无脉性室速或提高生存率无关。最佳的儿科除颤剂量仍未知。

相似文献

1
Effect of defibrillation energy dose during in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest.院内儿童心脏骤停时除颤能量剂量的影响。
Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):e16-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1617. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
2
Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children.儿科除颤剂量往往无法终止儿童长时间的院外心室颤动。
Resuscitation. 2005 Oct;67(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.04.018.
3
Energy dose for ventricular defibrillation of children.儿童心室除颤的能量剂量。
Pediatrics. 1976 Dec;58(6):898-901.
4
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).院外心脏骤停从直线双相波到单相波衰减正弦波除颤波形与高级生命支持干预试验(ORBIT)
Resuscitation. 2005 Aug;66(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.11.031.
5
Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos.赌场心脏骤停后保安人员进行快速除颤的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct 26;343(17):1206-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200010263431701.
6
Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.在猪心脏骤停与复苏模型中,按照自动体外除颤器的要求,单次电击时对心肺复苏的干扰最小化并不会影响复苏结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):3048-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186f612.
7
BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.双相波试验:院外心脏骤停时固定较低能量与递增较高能量水平除颤的随机对照比较。
Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):1511-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.648204. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
8
Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.急救人员经胸递增单相与双相除颤(TIMBER):单相与双相波形递增能量除颤用于室颤所致院外心脏骤停复苏的随机对照研究
Circulation. 2006 Nov 7;114(19):2010-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.636506. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
9
Clinical experience with a low-energy pulsed biphasic waveform in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.低能量脉冲双相波形用于院外心脏骤停的临床经验。
Resuscitation. 2008 Mar;76(3):350-3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
10
Initial defibrillation versus initial chest compression in a 4-minute ventricular fibrillation canine model of cardiac arrest.在心脏骤停的4分钟室颤犬模型中初始除颤与初始胸外按压的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):2250-2. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819ffc6a.

引用本文的文献

1
Energy doses for paediatric defibrillation in cardiac arrest: systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏骤停时小儿除颤的能量剂量:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Resusc Plus. 2025 May 26;24:100991. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100991. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Association between survival and number of shocks for pulseless ventricular arrhythmias during pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in a national registry.国家注册研究中儿科院内心搏骤停时无脉性室性心律失常的电击次数与存活率的关系。
Resuscitation. 2024 May;198:110200. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110200. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Inappropriate Shock Delivery Is Common During Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
在儿科院内心搏骤停期间,不适当的电击传递很常见。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):e390-e396. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003241. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Impact of different methods to activate the pediatric mode in automated external defibrillators by laypersons - A randomized controlled simulation study.非专业人员使用不同方法激活自动体外除颤器儿科模式的影响——一项随机对照模拟研究
Resusc Plus. 2022 Mar 31;10:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100223. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 7. Pediatric advanced life support.《2020年韩国心肺复苏指南》。第7部分。儿科高级生命支持。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 May;8(S):S81-S95. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.027. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 6. Pediatric basic life support.《2020年韩国心肺复苏指南。第6部分。儿科基础生命支持》
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 May;8(S):S65-S80. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.026. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Singapore Paediatric Resuscitation Guidelines 2016.《2016年新加坡儿科复苏指南》
Singapore Med J. 2017 Jul;58(7):373-390. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017065.
8
Adherence to AHA Guidelines When Adapted for Augmented Reality Glasses for Assisted Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.适用于增强现实眼镜辅助小儿心肺复苏时对美国心脏协会指南的遵循情况:一项随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 29;19(5):e183. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7379.
9
Part 6. Pediatric advanced life support: 2015 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.第6部分. 儿科高级生命支持:2015年韩国心肺复苏指南
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016 Jul 5;3(Suppl):S48-S61. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.132. eCollection 2016 Jul.
10
Part 12: Pediatric Advanced Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第12部分:儿科高级生命支持:2015年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S526-42. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000266.