• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非专业人员使用不同方法激活自动体外除颤器儿科模式的影响——一项随机对照模拟研究

Impact of different methods to activate the pediatric mode in automated external defibrillators by laypersons - A randomized controlled simulation study.

作者信息

Hansen Mette V, Løfgren Bo, Nadkarni Vinay M, Lauridsen Kasper G

机构信息

Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Department of Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2022 Mar 31;10:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100223. eCollection 2022 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100223
PMID:35403071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8983416/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Defibrillation with automated external defibrillators (AEDs) for smaller children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) should be performed using a pediatric mode. This study aims to investigate the easiest and fastest way to activate the pediatric mode on AEDs for pediatric OHCA.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled simulation study recruited 90 adult laypersons. Laypersons were randomized to use one of three AEDs with different methods to activate the pediatric mode: a Lifepak CR-T Trainer requiring switch of electrodes, a Phillips Heartstart FR3 Trainer with a "pediatric key", or a CU Medical IPAD SP1 Trainer with a pediatric button. Laypersons were asked to use an AED on a pediatric manikin and informed that activation of a pediatric mode was recommended.

RESULTS

Activation of the pediatric mode was achieved by 0/30 (0%) participants when switching electrodes (Lifepak CRT), 2/30 (7%) participants when using a key (Phillips FR3) and 18/30 (64%) participants when pushing a button (CU Medical SP1) (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) time to first shock among those who activated the pediatric mode were 102 (95-107) in the CU Medical SP1 group and 78 (78-78) in the Phillips FR3 group (p = 0.21). Most participants used the anterior-lateral position for electrodes.

CONCLUSION

Laypersons' ability to activate the pediatric mode on AEDs and correctly attach the electrodes was generally poor. More participants were able to activate the pediatric mode by pushing a button when compared to using a key or switching electrodes. Use of the Phillips FR3 AED was associated with faster shock delivery.

摘要

引言

对于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的小儿患者,使用自动体外除颤器(AED)进行除颤时应采用儿科模式。本研究旨在探究在小儿OHCA中激活AED儿科模式的最简单、最快速的方法。

方法

这项随机对照模拟研究招募了90名成年非专业人员。将非专业人员随机分配使用三种不同方法激活儿科模式的AED之一:需要切换电极的LifePak CR-T训练器、带有“儿科钥匙”的飞利浦HeartStart FR3训练器或带有儿科按钮的CU Medical IPAD SP1训练器。要求非专业人员在小儿人体模型上使用AED,并告知他们建议激活儿科模式。

结果

切换电极(LifePak CRT)时,0/30(0%)的参与者激活了儿科模式;使用钥匙(飞利浦FR3)时,2/30(7%)的参与者激活了儿科模式;按下按钮(CU Medical SP1)时,18/30(64%)的参与者激活了儿科模式(p<0.001)。在激活儿科模式的参与者中,首次电击的中位(四分位间距)时间在CU Medical SP1组为102(95-107),在飞利浦FR3组为78(78-78)(p=0.21)。大多数参与者将电极置于前外侧位置。

结论

非专业人员激活AED儿科模式并正确连接电极的能力总体较差。与使用钥匙或切换电极相比,更多参与者能够通过按下按钮激活儿科模式。使用飞利浦FR3 AED与更快的电击发放相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc1d/8983416/86ffbd251855/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc1d/8983416/9aa4cbd98cfa/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc1d/8983416/86ffbd251855/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc1d/8983416/9aa4cbd98cfa/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc1d/8983416/86ffbd251855/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of different methods to activate the pediatric mode in automated external defibrillators by laypersons - A randomized controlled simulation study.非专业人员使用不同方法激活自动体外除颤器儿科模式的影响——一项随机对照模拟研究
Resusc Plus. 2022 Mar 31;10:100223. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100223. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.心脏骤停时自动体外除颤器的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
3
Effects of AED device features on performance by untrained laypersons.非专业人员使用 AED 设备的性能特征。
Resuscitation. 2009 Nov;80(11):1285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.016. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
4
Can Mobile Videocall Assist Laypersons' Use of Automated External Defibrillators? A Randomized Simulation Study and Qualitative Analysis.移动视频通话能否帮助非专业人士使用自动体外除颤器?一项随机模拟研究和定性分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 24;2020:4069749. doi: 10.1155/2020/4069749. eCollection 2020.
5
Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of Automated External Defibrillators by laypersons in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using an SMS alert service.使用短信提醒服务,由非专业人员对院外心脏骤停进行早期心肺复苏和使用自动体外除颤器。
Resuscitation. 2011 Oct;82(10):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 May 20.
6
The Use of Automated External Defibrillators in Infants: A Report From the American Red Cross Scientific Advisory Council.自动体外除颤器在婴儿中的应用:美国红十字会科学咨询委员会的报告
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Jul;31(7):526-30. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000490.
7
Automated external defibrillators and simulated in-hospital cardiac arrests.自动体外除颤器与模拟院内心脏骤停
J Pediatr. 2009 May;154(5):672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.051. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
8
Automated external defibrillation training on the left or the right side - a randomized simulation study.左侧或右侧自动体外除颤训练——一项随机模拟研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 14;9:73-79. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S140220. eCollection 2017.
9
Automated external defibrillators delivered by drones to patients with suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.无人机向疑似院外心脏骤停患者运送自动体外除颤器。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Apr 14;43(15):1478-1487. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab498.
10
Performance of cellular phones with video telephony in the use of automated external defibrillators by untrained laypersons.非专业人员使用带视频电话功能的手机操作自动体外除颤器的性能。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Sep;25(9):597-600. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.058503.

引用本文的文献

1
Lay rescuer use of automated external defibrillators in infants, children and adolescents: A systematic review.非专业救援人员对婴儿、儿童和青少年使用自动体外除颤器的系统评价。
Resusc Plus. 2022 Aug 10;11:100283. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100283. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Paediatric defibrillation and the role of the layperson - Is it all in the voice?儿童除颤与非专业人员的作用——全都在于声音吗?
Resusc Plus. 2022 May 28;10:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100253. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Layperson use of AEDs - What happens after shock delivery?非专业人员使用自动体外除颤器——电击除颤后会发生什么?
Resuscitation. 2021 Dec;169:113-114. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
2
Association between shockable rhythms and long-term outcome after pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: An 18-year observational study.荷兰鹿特丹儿科院外心脏骤停后与可除颤节律相关的长期预后:一项 18 年观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2021 Sep;166:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.015. Epub 2021 May 31.
3
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support.
欧洲复苏委员会指南 2021:儿科生命支持。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:327-387. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
4
Pediatric Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.儿科生命支持:2020 国际心肺复苏与紧急心血管急救科学共识及治疗推荐。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_1):S140-S184. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000894. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第4部分:儿科基础与高级生命支持:2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S469-S523. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
6
Trends in the incidence and outcome of paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A 17-year observational study.儿童院外心脏骤停发病和转归趋势:一项 17 年观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
7
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Probability of bystander defibrillation relative to distance to nearest automated external defibrillator.院外心脏骤停:与最近的自动体外除颤器的距离相关的旁观者除颤概率。
Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.11.067. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
8
Skills among young and elderly laypersons during simulated dispatcher assisted CPR and after CPR training.年轻人和老年人外行人在模拟调度员辅助心肺复苏期间及心肺复苏培训后的技能表现。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Jan;62(1):125-133. doi: 10.1111/aas.13027. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Pre-shock chest compression pause effects on termination of ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia and return of organized rhythm within mechanical and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation.休克前胸部按压暂停对机械和徒手心肺复苏中室颤/室速终止及有组织心律恢复的影响。
Resuscitation. 2015 Aug;93:158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
The impact of peri-shock pause on survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest during the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium PRIMED trial.复苏结果联盟PRIMED试验期间,休克周围暂停对院外可电击心脏骤停患者生存的影响。
Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.