Suppr超能文献

使用 ELISA 与荧光珠法进行 HLA 抗体检测的结果,以及对接受男性 HLA 免疫供者的浓缩红细胞和血小板的受者数据的回顾性分析。

Results of HLA antibody testing using ELISA vs the fluorescent bead method and retrospective review of data for recipients of packed RBCs and platelets from male HLA-immunized donors.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77054, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jan;135(1):90-5. doi: 10.1309/AJCP98JNYHGCGMHK.

Abstract

We reviewed HLA antibody testing results using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for all male blood donors at our institution during a 3.5-month period to look for HLA immunization. Confirmatory testing of 33 blood samples positive for HLA class I and/or II antibodies was performed using the fluorescent bead method. A retrospective review of recipients of packed RBCs and platelets processed from these 33 HLA-immunized male donors were conducted to identify transfusion-related acute lung injury and cognate antigens. The agreement rates between the methods for HLA class I and II antibodies were 21% (7/33) and 6% (2/33), respectively. We noted HLA antibodies in the male donors corresponding to cognate antigens in 2 recipients of packed RBCs and in 3 recipients of platelets. Of 8 donors positive for HLA antibodies, 5 did not have a history of blood transfusion. We conclude that ELISA was too sensitive and had a high false-positive rate for the detection of HLA class II antibodies.

摘要

我们回顾了在我们机构的 3.5 个月期间对所有男性献血者进行的 HLA 抗体检测结果,以寻找 HLA 免疫。对 33 份 HLA 类 I 和/或 II 抗体阳性的血液样本进行了荧光珠法的确认性检测。对来自这 33 名 HLA 免疫男性供体的浓缩红细胞和血小板进行了回顾性分析,以确定输血相关的急性肺损伤和同源抗原。HLA 类 I 和 II 抗体检测方法的一致性率分别为 21%(7/33)和 6%(2/33)。我们在 2 名浓缩红细胞接受者和 3 名血小板接受者中发现了与男性供体 HLA 抗体相对应的同源抗原。在 8 名 HLA 抗体阳性的供体中,有 5 名没有输血史。我们得出结论,ELISA 对 HLA 类 II 抗体的检测过于敏感,假阳性率较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验