Suppr超能文献

门诊经桡动脉途径的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

Transradial approach percutaneous coronary interventions in an out-patient clinic.

作者信息

Chung Wen-Jung, Fang Hsiu-Yu, Tsai Tzu-Hsien, Yang Cheng-Hsu, Chen Chien-Jen, Chen Shyh-Ming, Cheng Cheng-I, Fang Chih-Yuan, Hsieh Yuan-Kai, Hang Chi-Ling, Yip Hon-Kan, Wu Chiung-Jen

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital- Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College of Medicine.

出版信息

Int Heart J. 2010;51(6):371-6. doi: 10.1536/ihj.51.371.

Abstract

Same-day discharge transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) has been reported to be safe and feasible in Western countries. However, Asia has not produced any reports related to this matter. The present study explored the safety and feasibility of patients with indications for TR coronary angiography and ad hoc PCI with a same-day discharge protocol. Between October 1995 and December 2002, 660 adult patients were admitted to our hospital for ad hoc PCIs. Of these, 214 patients were discharged on the day of their PCI (group A), while the remaining 446 patients were referred for out-patient department (OPD) PCI with subsequent admission (group B). Periprocedural complications were not significantly different between the groups. There were no differences in 1-month major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (1.4% versus 0.2% for groups A and B, respectively; P = 0.068). Three group A cases (1.4%) experienced peri- and post-PCI myocardial infarction and one group B case (0.2%) experienced a post-PCI myocardial infarction. No patient died or required emergency bypass surgery. In group A, 8 cases (3.7%) required cutting balloon angioplasty and 2 cases (0.9%) needed rotational atherectomy. TRI is safe and feasible on an outpatient basis. For select patients, even though PCI can carry the potential risk of subsequent cutting balloon angioplasty or rotational atherectomy, the procedure should still be considered.

摘要

据报道,在西方国家,当日出院的经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗(TRI)是安全可行的。然而,亚洲尚未有关于此事的任何报道。本研究探讨了采用当日出院方案进行TR冠状动脉造影和临时PCI的患者的安全性和可行性。1995年10月至2002年12月期间,660例成年患者因临时PCI入住我院。其中,214例患者在PCI当日出院(A组),其余446例患者被转至门诊PCI并随后入院(B组)。两组围手术期并发症无显著差异。1个月时的主要不良心脏事件包括死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建方面无差异(A组和B组分别为1.4%和0.2%;P = 0.068)。A组有3例(1.4%)发生PCI围手术期及术后心肌梗死,B组有1例(0.2%)发生PCI术后心肌梗死。无患者死亡或需要紧急搭桥手术。在A组中,8例(3.7%)需要切割球囊血管成形术,2例(0.9%)需要旋磨术。TRI在门诊进行是安全可行的。对于部分患者,即使PCI可能存在后续需要切割球囊血管成形术或旋磨术的潜在风险,该手术仍应予以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验