• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠期和产后糖尿病筛查中的空白。

Gaps in diabetes screening during pregnancy and postpartum.

机构信息

From Quest Diagnostics, West Norriton, Pennsylvania, San Juan Capistrano, California, and Madison, New Jersey.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;117(1):61-68. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe424b.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe424b
PMID:21173645
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the screening rate and prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the screening rate and prevalence of postpartum diabetes, in a large, national sample of pregnant women. We also estimated the potential effects of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations, which replace the 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with the 75-g OGTT, on GDM prevalence and gestational plasma glucose testing practices.

METHODS

We identified pregnant women who used the laboratory services of Quest Diagnostics and who were screened for GDM and were tested postpartum. Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence was calculated according to the current American Diabetes Association/ Carpenter-Coustan criteria, and the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight percent (632,820/924,873) of pregnant women aged 25 to 40 (ie, those not in a low-risk age group) who utilized the services of Quest Diagnostics during this study were screened for GDM. Of the entire adult pregnant population (ages 18-40) who received GDM screening, 5% (40,955/842,993) had positive test results under the current criteria. Nineteen percent (4,486/23,299) of those with GDM received postpartum diabetes testing within a 6-month period. Ninety percent (148,749/166,085) of all confirmatory GDM tests performed on pregnant women at Quest Diagnostics were the 100-g OGTT. The number of women with GDM after receiving the 75-g OGTT would have doubled under the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria.

CONCLUSION

Many women may not be receiving GDM screening during pregnancy. Postpartum diabetes screening rates after pregnancy remain low. Adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria would require a significant change in current clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

在一个大型的全国性孕妇样本中,估计妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的筛查率和患病率,以及产后糖尿病的筛查率和患病率。我们还估计了新的国际妊娠糖尿病研究组建议的潜在影响,该建议用 75 克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)取代 100 克 OGTT,对 GDM 的患病率和妊娠期间血糖检测实践的影响。

方法

我们确定了使用 Quest Diagnostics 实验室服务并接受 GDM 筛查和产后检测的孕妇。根据当前的美国糖尿病协会/卡朋特-库斯坦标准和新的国际妊娠糖尿病研究组标准计算 GDM 的患病率。

结果

在这项研究中,68%(632820/924873)年龄在 25 至 40 岁(即不属于低风险年龄组)的接受 Quest Diagnostics 服务的孕妇接受了 GDM 的筛查。在接受 GDM 筛查的整个成年孕妇(年龄 18-40 岁)人群中,5%(40955/842993)根据现行标准检测结果呈阳性。19%(4486/23299)的 GDM 患者在 6 个月内接受了产后糖尿病检测。在 Quest Diagnostics 对孕妇进行的所有确诊 GDM 检测中,90%(148749/166085)为 100 克 OGTT。根据国际妊娠糖尿病研究组的标准,接受 75 克 OGTT 的 GDM 患者人数将增加一倍。

结论

许多孕妇在怀孕期间可能未接受 GDM 筛查。产后糖尿病筛查率仍较低。采用新的国际妊娠糖尿病研究组标准将需要对当前的临床实践进行重大改变。

证据水平

III。

相似文献

1
Gaps in diabetes screening during pregnancy and postpartum.妊娠期和产后糖尿病筛查中的空白。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;117(1):61-68. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe424b.
2
Perinatal outcomes associated with the diagnosis of gestational diabetes made by the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria.根据国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组协会标准诊断的妊娠期糖尿病的围产期结局
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):571-578. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000412.
3
The impact of adoption of the international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes.国际妊娠糖尿病协会标准用于妊娠期糖尿病筛查和诊断的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):224.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
Use of the National Diabetes Data Group and the Carpenter-Coustan criteria for assessing gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.使用国家糖尿病数据组及卡彭特-库斯坦标准评估妊娠期糖尿病及不良妊娠结局风险。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:231. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1030-9.
5
Pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus according to the Carpenter-Coustan criteria in Thailand.根据泰国Carpenter-Coustan标准,患有妊娠期糖尿病的女性的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Sep;41(9):1345-51. doi: 10.1111/jog.12727. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
6
Fourfold increase in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus after adoption of the new International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria.采用新的国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)标准后,妊娠糖尿病患病率增加了四倍。
J Perinat Med. 2017 Apr 1;45(3):359-366. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0099.
7
Effect of new criteria on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in women submitted to gastric bypass.新标准对接受胃旁路手术的女性妊娠糖尿病诊断的影响。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus detected by the national diabetes data group or the carpenter and coustan plasma glucose thresholds.通过国家糖尿病数据组或卡彭特和库斯坦血糖阈值检测出的妊娠糖尿病患病率。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Sep;25(9):1625-30. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1625.
9
Universal two-step screening strategy for gestational diabetes has weak relevance in French Mediterranean women: should we simplify the screening strategy for gestational diabetes in France?通用两步筛查策略对法国地中海地区孕妇的相关性较弱:我们是否应该简化法国的妊娠期糖尿病筛查策略?
Diabetes Metab. 2011 Nov;37(5):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
10
The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus before and after the introduction of HAPO diagnostic criteria.采用HAPO诊断标准前后妊娠期糖尿病的发病率。
Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(6):404-411.

引用本文的文献

1
Gestational Diabetes-Screening, Prevalence and Postpartum Diabetes: Population-Based Cohort Study.妊娠期糖尿病——筛查、患病率及产后糖尿病:基于人群的队列研究
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2025 Jul;41(5):e70068. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.70068.
2
Association between different response patterns during oral glucose tolerance test and postpartum glucose intolerance in women with gestational diabetes.妊娠期糖尿病女性口服葡萄糖耐量试验期间不同反应模式与产后葡萄糖不耐受之间的关联。
Endocrine. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04327-3.
3
INVESTIGATION OF ADHERENCE TO POSTPARTUM DIABETES SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PATIENTS WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES, IN TURKEY; A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.
土耳其妊娠期糖尿病患者产后糖尿病筛查建议依从性的调查;一项横断面研究。
Acta Endocrinol (Buchar). 2024 Jul-Sep;20(3):334-340. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2024.334. Epub 2025 May 23.
4
Predictive value of machine learning for the progression of gestational diabetes mellitus to type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习对妊娠期糖尿病进展为2型糖尿病的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02848-x.
5
Determinants of access to and use of gestational diabetes mellitus services in Kenya: a multimethod case study protocol.肯尼亚获得和使用妊娠期糖尿病服务的决定因素:一项多方法案例研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 22;13(12):e074916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074916.
6
Gestational diabetes in Germany-prevalence, trend during the past decade and utilization of follow-up care: an observational study.德国的妊娠期糖尿病:患病率、过去十年的趋势及随访护理的利用情况:一项观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43382-6.
7
The Incidence and Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.妊娠期糖尿病后2型糖尿病的发病率及管理
Cureus. 2023 Aug 31;15(8):e44468. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44468. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Genetics and Epigenetics: Implications for the Life Course of Gestational Diabetes.遗传学与表观遗传学:对妊娠期糖尿病病程的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 23;24(7):6047. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076047.
9
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Multi-Ethnic, High-Risk Population: Adequacy of Screening for Diabetes Mellitus 6 Weeks after Delivery.多民族高危人群中的妊娠期糖尿病:产后 6 周筛查糖尿病的充分性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113946.
10
Continuous Glucose Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study.妊娠期糖尿病的连续血糖监测:一项初步研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Oct 17;2022:5142918. doi: 10.1155/2022/5142918. eCollection 2022.