• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰国家心血管疾病预防计划对临床初级心血管疾病预防质量的影响。

The impact of the Polish national Programme of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention on the quality of primary cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.

机构信息

Epidemiology and Population Studies Department, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Kardiol Pol. 2010 Dec;68(12):1332-40.

PMID:21174285
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a decline since 1991, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the major burden on public health in Poland.

AIM

To assess the impact of the national Programme of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (PCVDP) on the quality of primary CVD prevention in clinical practice.

METHODS

Sixty six primary care centres were invited to join the project (2-6 in each province). Half of these centres participated in the PCVDP (in other words, they were 'active' clinics) and the other half was included in the control group. A random sample of 300 patients aged 35-55, free of coronary heart disease, with no history of stroke or peripheral artery disease, and with medical documentation going back at least to 1 January 2005 was selected for the study in each centre. From the total of 3,940 patients in active clinics, 3,162 were judged to be eligible for the study and their medical records were reviewed. All were invited for examination. This was finally attended by 2,314 patients from active clinics and 2,101 from the control group.

RESULTS

Before the introduction of the PCVDP, the percentage of patients with available information on risk factors in medical records was similar in the active and in the control clinics, and varied from more than 40% (hypertension) to less than 5% (weight and waist circumference). After the introduction of the PCVDP, the proportion of subjects with available information on risk factors greatly increased in the clinics which took part in the PCVDP. Knowledge of CVD risk factors was similar in the two studied groups. When asked, about 10% of patients in both groups could not list a single CVD risk factor. Smoking was the most frequently recognised risk factor (named by more than 60% of patients) and diabetes the least (less than 15%). No significant difference was found between the active and control clinics in the frequency of counselling as to smoking, diet, weight reduction or exercise. Only about 40% of smoking patients had received advice on smoking cessation. Counselling on diet had been received by about 40% of patients. Less than 20% of patients had been advised to reduce weight, with about 25% having received advice to increase their physical activity. Control of risk factors was poor and there was no significant difference between the active and control clinics in terms of the proportion of patients who reached prevention targets.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The PCVDP appears to be effective in identifying high risk patients. 2. The effectiveness of the routine management of risk factors in primary care is very low. 3. Addressing via the PCVDP all decisions as to the extent and means of intervention on risk factors to primary care physicians appears to be ineffective. 4. There is a need to introduce an effective structured intervention on risk factors and add it to the PCVDP.
摘要

背景

尽管自 1991 年以来有所下降,但心血管疾病(CVD)仍是波兰公共卫生的主要负担。

目的

评估国家心血管疾病预防计划(PCVDP)对临床实践中初级 CVD 预防质量的影响。

方法

邀请了 66 个初级保健中心参加该项目(每个省 2-6 个中心)。其中一半中心参加了 PCVDP(换句话说,它们是“活跃”诊所),另一半被纳入对照组。在每个中心,从 35-55 岁、无冠心病、无中风或外周动脉疾病史且至少有 2005 年 1 月 1 日之前的医疗记录的 300 名患者中随机抽取了 300 名患者进行研究。在 3940 名活跃诊所患者中,共有 3162 名被认为符合研究条件,并对其病历进行了审查。所有患者均被邀请接受检查。最终,有 2314 名来自活跃诊所的患者和 2101 名来自对照组的患者参加了检查。

结果

在引入 PCVDP 之前,活跃诊所和对照组的病历中记录的危险因素信息的百分比相似,从超过 40%(高血压)到不到 5%(体重和腰围)不等。在引入 PCVDP 之后,参与 PCVDP 的诊所中,记录有危险因素信息的患者比例大大增加。两组患者对 CVD 危险因素的了解相似。当被问到这个问题时,两组中约有 10%的患者无法列出一个 CVD 危险因素。吸烟是最常被识别的危险因素(超过 60%的患者提到过),而糖尿病是最不受关注的(不到 15%)。活跃诊所和对照组在吸烟、饮食、减肥或运动方面的咨询频率没有显著差异。只有约 40%的吸烟患者接受了戒烟建议。约有 40%的患者接受了饮食咨询。不到 20%的患者被建议减肥,约 25%的患者被建议增加体力活动。危险因素控制不佳,活跃诊所和对照组在达到预防目标的患者比例方面没有显著差异。

结论

  1. PCVDP 似乎能有效地识别高危患者。2. 初级保健中危险因素常规管理的效果非常低。3. 通过 PCVDP 将所有关于危险因素的干预范围和方法的决策告知初级保健医生似乎无效。4. 需要引入一种有效的结构化干预危险因素,并将其添加到 PCVDP 中。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Polish national Programme of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention on the quality of primary cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.波兰国家心血管疾病预防计划对临床初级心血管疾病预防质量的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Dec;68(12):1332-40.
2
The National Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases and Health Promotion in Pakistan--Cardiovascular diseases.《巴基斯坦非传染性疾病预防控制与健康促进国家行动计划——心血管疾病》
J Pak Med Assoc. 2004 Dec;54(12 Suppl 3):S14-25.
3
Screening for major cardiovascular risk factors among Members of Polish Parliament as a continuation of health marketing for effective cardiovascular prevention in Poland. Warsaw, May 2006.对波兰议会议员进行主要心血管危险因素筛查,作为波兰有效心血管疾病预防健康推广活动的延续。华沙,2006年5月。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 May;65(5):486-92; discussion 493-4.
4
Polish Forum for Prevention: a response to the European Society of Cardiology 'call for action' in Poland.波兰预防论坛:对欧洲心脏病学会在波兰发出的“行动呼吁”的回应。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Apr;17(2):250. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328334f43f.
5
Can general practitioners provide effective cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention? Dreams and realities of CVD prevention.全科医生能否提供有效的心血管疾病(CVD)预防?心血管疾病预防的梦想与现实。
N Z Med J. 2011 Jan 21;124(1328):72-81.
6
Cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in Finland.芬兰的心血管疾病及风险因素
Prev Med. 1999 Dec;29(6 Pt 2):S124-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0403.
7
Assessment of capacity for cardiovascular disease control and prevention in Thailand: a qualitative study.泰国心血管疾病控制与预防能力评估:一项定性研究。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005 May;36(3):741-7.
8
Vascular endothelium summary statement II: Cardiovascular disease prevention and control.血管内皮总结声明II:心血管疾病的预防与控制。
Vascul Pharmacol. 2007 May;46(5):318-20. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2006.10.019. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
9
[Physical activity in basic and primary prevention of cardiovascular disease].[体力活动在心血管疾病的基础预防和一级预防中的作用]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2009 Jun;26(156):659-64.
10
Cardiovascular diseases and their prevention in Minnesota.明尼苏达州的心血管疾病及其预防
Minn Med. 2003 May;86(5):42-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation strategies to increase smoking cessation treatment provision in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies.提高初级保健中戒烟治疗提供的实施策略:观察性研究的系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 25;24(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01981-2.
2
The Severity of Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adults Over a Five-Year Interval.成年人在五年间隔内心血管风险因素变化的严重程度。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Oct 19;15:1979-1990. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S265993. eCollection 2020.
3
Cardiovascular Risk Distribution in a Contemporary Polish Collective.
当代波兰人群的心血管风险分布。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 9;17(9):3306. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093306.
4
Evaluation of Postural Stability and Transverse Abdominal Muscle Activity in Overweight Post-Stroke Patients: A Prospective, Observational Study.超重中风后患者姿势稳定性和腹横肌活动的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Feb 19;13:451-462. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S235015. eCollection 2020.
5
Do family physicians advise younger people on cardiovascular disease prevention? A cross-sectional study from Slovenia.家庭医生是否为年轻人提供心血管疾病预防建议?来自斯洛文尼亚的一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Jun 14;14:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-82.
6
Measurement error of waist circumference: gaps in knowledge.腰围测量误差:知识鸿沟。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Feb;16(2):281-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012002741. Epub 2012 May 25.