• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以交通导向型发展对加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市房价的影响。

The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA.

机构信息

University of North Carolina, Charlotte.

出版信息

Urban Stud. 2011;48(1):101-27. doi: 10.1177/0042098009359958.

DOI:10.1177/0042098009359958
PMID:21174895
Abstract

This research measures the influence of transit-oriented development (TOD) on the San Diego, CA, condominium market. Many view TOD as a key element in creating a less auto dependent and more sustainable transport system. Price premiums indicate a potential for a market-driven expansion of TOD inventory. A hedonic price model is estimated to isolate statistically the effect of TOD. This includes interaction terms between station distance and various measures of pedestrian orientation. The resulting model shows that station proximity has a significantly stronger impact when coupled with a pedestrian-oriented environment. Conversely, station area condominiums in more auto-oriented environments may sell at a discount. This indicates that TOD has a synergistic value greater than the sum of its parts. It also implies a healthy demand for more TOD housing in San Diego.

摘要

本研究旨在衡量交通导向型发展(TOD)对加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市共管公寓市场的影响。许多人认为 TOD 是构建更少依赖汽车和更可持续交通系统的关键要素。价格溢价表明 TOD 存量具有市场驱动扩张的潜力。采用特征价格模型来从统计学上分离 TOD 的影响。这包括车站距离与各种行人导向措施之间的交互项。由此产生的模型表明,当车站靠近与行人导向环境相结合时,其影响会显著增强。相反,在更偏向汽车的环境中,靠近车站区域的共管公寓可能会打折出售。这表明 TOD 的协同价值大于其各部分的总和。这也意味着圣地亚哥对更多 TOD 住房的需求健康增长。

相似文献

1
The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA.以交通导向型发展对加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市房价的影响。
Urban Stud. 2011;48(1):101-27. doi: 10.1177/0042098009359958.
2
Retrofitting the suburbs to increase walking: evidence from a land-use-travel study.将郊区进行改造以增加步行出行:基于土地利用-出行研究的证据。
Urban Stud. 2011;48(1):129-59. doi: 10.1177/0042098010364859.
3
Aestheticizing the ancestral city: antiquarianism, topography and the representation of London in the long eighteenth century.美化古老城市:古物研究、地形学与18世纪漫长岁月里伦敦的形象呈现
Art Hist. 1999;22(4):472-94. doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00172.
4
Where is the café? The challenge of making retail uses viable in mixed-use suburban developments.咖啡厅在哪里?在混合用途的郊区开发中使零售用途可行的挑战。
Urban Stud. 2011;48(1):177-95. doi: 10.1177/0042098009360232.
5
The development of residential urban renewal policies in England: planning for modernization in the 1960s.英国城市住宅更新政策的发展:20世纪60年代的现代化规划。
Plan Perspect. 1999;14(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/026654399364328.
6
[Portrait of a group: the middle classes and public housing in interwar Paris].[一组人物画像:两次世界大战之间巴黎的中产阶级与公共住房]
Cah Hist. 1999;44(4):701-15.
7
Comparing the capitalisation benefits of light-rail transit and overlay zoning for single-family houses and condos by neighbourhood type in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona.比较亚利桑那州凤凰城大都市不同社区类型的轻轨交通和覆盖分区对独户住宅和共管公寓的资本收益。
Urban Stud. 2010;47(11):2409-426. doi: 10.1177/0042098009357963.
8
Locating Chinese urban housing policy in an international context.在国际背景下定位中国城市住房政策。
Urban Stud. 2010;47(14):2965-982. doi: 10.1177/0042098009360219.
9
Changing cities in post-Soviet Russia.后苏联时代俄罗斯的城市变迁
New Left Rev. 1999(236):53-77.
10
A silver lining? The connection between gasoline prices and obesity.一线希望?汽油价格与肥胖之间的联系。
Econ Inq. 2011;49(3):935-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00266.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Case-comparison study protocol for gauging effects of neighbourhood trends and sickness: examining the perceptions of transit-Induced gentrification in Prince George's County.社区趋势和疾病影响评估的病例对照研究方案:检验乔治王子县对过境诱导式绅士化的看法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):e039733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039733.
2
The Color of Health: Residential Segregation, Light Rail Transit Developments, and Gentrification in the United States.《健康的色彩:美国的居住隔离、轻轨交通发展与 gentrification》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 30;16(19):3683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193683.