Suppr超能文献

[尼美根人工耳蜗植入问卷中文版的信效度分析]

[Analysis of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire].

作者信息

Dong Rui-juan, Liu Bo, Peng Xiao-xia, Chen Xue-qing, Gong Shu-sheng

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10005, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Oct;45(10):818-23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ).

METHODS

There were six subdomains: basic sound perception, advanced sound perception, speech production, self-esteem, activities and social Interactions. The cross-cultural adaptation measures were used to translate the NCIQ into its Chinese version. Ninety-four cochlear implant users no younger than 18 years old were included. Test-retest analysis was administered randomly to 30 users without significant changes in health and social status during a two weeks' interval between test and retest.

RESULTS

(1) Reliability: test-retest reliability of the NCIQ was proved to be satisfactory. All domains had coefficients that exceeded 0.70 (P < 0.01). Except for the subdomain, speech production, whose Cronbach's α score was 0.560, other Cronbach's α scores were greater than 0.700. (2) VALIDITY: The correlation coefficients between overall NCIQ scores and the six subdomains were 0.620 - 0.810 (P < 0.01). There were weak or no correlations among the six subdomains. The evaluation of content validity by expert review showed the questionnaire had good content validity. NCIQ total scores in postlingually deafened users were significantly higher than those in prelingually deafened users (Z = 4.350, P = 0.000). This was also true for scores of the following subdomains:advanced sound perception (Z = 4.774, P = 0.000), speech production (Z = 4.416, P = 0.000), self-esteem (Z = 3.718, P = 0.000), activities (Z = 3.228, P = 0.001) and social interactions (Z = 3.001, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference between scores obtained from the two groups in the subdomain of basic sound perception (Z = 1.943, P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the NCIQ meets many psychometric criteria of a robust instrument. It possesses appropriate validity and good reliability, and can be used to measure the outcome of cochlear implant adults in China.

摘要

目的

探讨中文版奈梅亨人工耳蜗问卷(NCIQ)的信度和效度。

方法

该问卷有六个子领域:基本声音感知、高级声音感知、言语产生、自尊、活动和社交互动。采用跨文化适应措施将NCIQ翻译成中文版。纳入94名年龄不小于18岁的人工耳蜗使用者。对30名健康和社会状况在测试和复测期间两周内无显著变化的使用者进行随机重测分析。

结果

(1)信度:NCIQ的重测信度被证明是令人满意的。所有领域的系数均超过0.70(P<0.01)。除言语产生子领域的克朗巴赫α系数为0.560外,其他克朗巴赫α系数均大于0.700。(2)效度:NCIQ总分与六个子领域之间的相关系数为0.620 - 0.810(P<0.01)。六个子领域之间的相关性较弱或无相关性。专家评审对内容效度的评估表明该问卷具有良好的内容效度。语后聋使用者的NCIQ总分显著高于语前聋使用者(Z = 4.350,P = 0.000)。以下子领域的得分情况也是如此:高级声音感知(Z = 4.774,P = 0.000)、言语产生(Z = 4.416,P = 0.000)、自尊(Z = 3.718,P = 0.000)、活动(Z = 3.228,P = 0.001)和社交互动(Z = 3.001,P = 0.003)。在基本声音感知子领域,两组得分之间无显著差异(Z = 1.943,P = 0.052)。

结论

中文版NCIQ符合一种可靠工具的许多心理测量标准。它具有适当的效度和良好的信度,可用于评估中国成年人工耳蜗使用者的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验