Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Blood. 2011 Feb 24;117(8):2469-75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307280. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
We evaluated concurrent gene mutations, clinical outcome, and gene expression signatures of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) double mutations (CEBPA(dm)) versus single mutations (CEBPA(sm)) in 1182 cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (16-60 years of age). We identified 151 (12.8%) patients with CEBPA mutations (91 CEBPA(dm) and 60 CEBPA(sm)). The incidence of germline mutations was 7% (5 of 71), including 3 C-terminal mutations. CEBPA(dm) patients had a lower frequency of concurrent mutations than CEBPA(sm) patients (P < .0001). Both, groups were associated with a favorable outcome compared with CEBPA(wt) (5-year overall survival [OS] 63% and 56% vs 39%; P < .0001 and P = .05, respectively). However, in multivariable analysis only CEBPA(dm) was a prognostic factor for favorable OS outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, P < .0001; event-free survival, HR 0.41, P < .0001; relapse-free survival, HR 0.55, P = .001). Outcome in CEBPA(sm) is dominated by concurrent NPM1 and/or FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations. Unsupervised and supervised GEP analyses showed that CEBPA(dm) AML (n = 42), but not CEBPA(sm) AML (n = 18), expressed a unique gene signature. A 25-probe set prediction signature for CEBPA(dm) AML showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. Based on these findings, we propose that CEBPA(dm) should be clearly defined from CEBPA(sm) AML and considered as a separate entity in the classification of AML.
我们评估了 1182 例核型正常的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者(年龄 16-60 岁)中 CCAAT/增强子结合蛋白α(CEBPA)双突变(CEBPA(dm))与单突变(CEBPA(sm))的并发基因突变、临床结局和基因表达特征。我们发现 151 例(12.8%)CEBPA 突变患者(91 例 CEBPA(dm)和 60 例 CEBPA(sm))。胚系突变的发生率为 7%(71 例中有 5 例),包括 3 例 C 端突变。CEBPA(dm)患者的并发突变频率低于 CEBPA(sm)患者(P<.0001)。与 CEBPA(wt)相比,两组患者的结局均较好(5 年总生存率[OS]分别为 63%和 56% vs 39%;P<.0001 和 P=0.05)。然而,多变量分析仅 CEBPA(dm)是 OS 结局良好的预后因素(风险比[HR]0.36,P<.0001;无事件生存 HR 0.41,P<.0001;无复发生存 HR 0.55,P=0.001)。CEBPA(sm)的结局主要由并发 NPM1 和/或 FLT3 内部串联重复突变决定。非监督和监督 GEP 分析显示,CEBPA(dm)AML(n=42),而非 CEBPA(sm)AML(n=18),表达了一个独特的基因特征。CEBPA(dm)AML 的 25 探针集预测特征显示 100%的敏感性和特异性。基于这些发现,我们建议将 CEBPA(dm)与 CEBPA(sm)AML 明确区分,并在 AML 的分类中将其视为一个单独的实体。