Division of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA..
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Mar;49(3):955-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02119-10. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), a cause of food-borne colitis and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children, can be serotype O157:H7 (O157) or other serotypes (non-O157). E. coli O157 can be detected by culture with sorbitol-MacConkey agar (SMAC), but non-O157 STEC cannot be detected with this medium. Both O157 and non-O157 STEC can be detected by immunoassay for Shiga toxins 1 and 2. The objectives of this study were first to compare the diagnostic utility of SMAC to that of the Premier EHEC enzyme immunoassay (Meridian Diagnostics) for detection of STEC in children and second to compare the clinical and laboratory characteristics of children with serotype O157:H7 STEC and non-O157:H7 STEC infections. Stool samples submitted for testing for STEC between April 2004 and September 2009 were tested by both SMAC culture and the Premier EHEC assay at Children's Hospital Boston. Samples positive by either test were sent for confirmatory testing and serotyping at the Hinton State Laboratory Institute (HSLI). Chart review was performed on children with confirmed STEC infection. Of 5,110 children tested for STEC, 50 (0.9%) had STEC infection confirmed by culture; 33 were O157:H7 and 17 were non-O157:H7. The Premier EHEC assay and SMAC culture detected 96.0% and 58.0% of culture-confirmed STEC isolates (any serotype), respectively, and 93.9% and 87.9% of STEC O157:H7 isolates, respectively. There were no significant differences in disease severity or laboratory manifestations of STEC infection between children with O157:H7 and those with non-O157 STEC. The Premier EHEC assay was significantly more sensitive than SMAC culture for diagnosis of STEC, and O157:H7 and non-O157:H7 STEC caused infections of similar severity in children.
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)是儿童食源性结肠炎和溶血尿毒综合征的病原体,可分为血清型 O157:H7(O157)和其他血清型(非 O157)。可以通过在山梨醇麦康凯琼脂(SMAC)上培养来检测大肠杆菌 O157,但不能用这种培养基检测非 O157 STEC。O157 和非 O157 STEC 都可以通过免疫法检测志贺毒素 1 和 2 来检测。本研究的目的是首先比较 SMAC 与 Premier EHEC 酶免疫分析(Meridian Diagnostics)在检测儿童 STEC 中的诊断效果,其次比较 O157:H7 STEC 和非 O157:H7 STEC 感染患儿的临床和实验室特征。2004 年 4 月至 2009 年 9 月,波士顿儿童医院对提交的 STEC 检测样本进行了 SMAC 培养和 Premier EHEC 检测。两种检测方法均为阳性的样本被送往 Hinton 州立实验室研究所(HSLI)进行确认检测和血清分型。对确诊 STEC 感染的患儿进行了图表回顾。在 5110 名接受 STEC 检测的患儿中,有 50 名(0.9%)通过培养确认 STEC 感染;其中 33 名是 O157:H7,17 名是非 O157:H7。Premier EHEC 检测和 SMAC 培养分别检测到 96.0%和 58.0%的培养确认 STEC 分离株(任何血清型),以及分别为 93.9%和 87.9%的 O157:H7 STEC 分离株。O157:H7 和非 O157 STEC 感染患儿的疾病严重程度或 STEC 感染的实验室表现无显著差异。Premier EHEC 检测在诊断 STEC 方面明显优于 SMAC 培养,O157:H7 和非 O157:H7 STEC 在儿童中引起的感染严重程度相似。